G.T.
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
Bill C wrote:
> On Jun 27, 7:01 am, bar <barbari...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 6:40 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> If you manage it properly, it's good for you.
>>>>> Ever hear of osteoporosis?
>>>> Hey dumbass
>>>> Ever hear of non, or low impact weight bearing activities?
>>>> Bill C
>>> ----------
>>> I don't get your point. low impact means eventually your bones will lose
>>> their density, not a good thing. Like old people, they fall down and break
>>> a hip or whatever. The problem with space travel, is too much bone loss,
>>> due to the lack of gravity. He is correct, running is good for the bones,
>>> cycling is bad for the bones. You only have to run once a week to get your
>>> body to take of those bones.
>> I think i agree with most of what Calli says. Plus running (that is,
>> during a good run) gets you into this ethereal state of mind that you
>> can never ever get with cycling (well maybe with pot belge and high
>> altitude you can get close).
>
> It's the weight bearing stress that's important:
>
> http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/osteoporosis/HQ00643
>
> Movements to avoid
> Mild bone deterioration without osteoporosis shouldn't interfere with
> recreation. In fact, activities such as golf and bowling may be
> beneficial. But if you have osteoporosis, don't do the following types
> of exercises:
Or just choose the Tour de France breakfast:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6131132
That's pure calcium in the syringe on the right. Or maybe not.
Greg
--
http://ticketmastersucks.org
> On Jun 27, 7:01 am, bar <barbari...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 6:40 am, "Callistus Valerius" <jazzyb...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> If you manage it properly, it's good for you.
>>>>> Ever hear of osteoporosis?
>>>> Hey dumbass
>>>> Ever hear of non, or low impact weight bearing activities?
>>>> Bill C
>>> ----------
>>> I don't get your point. low impact means eventually your bones will lose
>>> their density, not a good thing. Like old people, they fall down and break
>>> a hip or whatever. The problem with space travel, is too much bone loss,
>>> due to the lack of gravity. He is correct, running is good for the bones,
>>> cycling is bad for the bones. You only have to run once a week to get your
>>> body to take of those bones.
>> I think i agree with most of what Calli says. Plus running (that is,
>> during a good run) gets you into this ethereal state of mind that you
>> can never ever get with cycling (well maybe with pot belge and high
>> altitude you can get close).
>
> It's the weight bearing stress that's important:
>
> http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/osteoporosis/HQ00643
>
> Movements to avoid
> Mild bone deterioration without osteoporosis shouldn't interfere with
> recreation. In fact, activities such as golf and bowling may be
> beneficial. But if you have osteoporosis, don't do the following types
> of exercises:
Or just choose the Tour de France breakfast:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6131132
That's pure calcium in the syringe on the right. Or maybe not.
Greg
--
http://ticketmastersucks.org