Mike Eglesias Folow-up

[Edward Dolan]

On Jul 24, 6:29 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "Mike Iglesias" <igles...@draco.acs.uci.edu> wrote in message
>
> news:rec-bicycles-weekly-1070723@draco.acs.uci.edu...
> [...]
>
> > Nettiquette
> [...]
> > * If you are asking a basic question, please check the FAQ first. If
> > the
> > FAQ is has expired on your system, see the "Archives" section below
> > for information on how to get a copy.
>
> Nonsense, everyone is asking basic questions all the time, If no one did
> that, every newsgroup would quickly die a sudden death. Only a complete
> idiot like Tom Sherman would ever go to the archives.
>
> > * If someone posts a question about something that was resolved
> > recently,
> > please answer the poster via email. Rehashing something that was
> > just
> > discussed is a waste of bandwidth unless you have something new to
> > add.
>
> NEVER answer anything via email. You may get yourself murdered that way.
>
> By the way, 99% of all posters never add anything new. They just rehash
> and
> rehash until you want to puke.
>
> > * Please don't flame someone if their posting should have been
> > restricted
> > to a certain region (for example, california only). Most people are
> > not
> > the news admin on their system, so publicly flaming them does no
> > good.
> > A nicely worded email message to them that there may be a problem
> > would allow them to notify their news admin. Please remember that
> > it may be some other site somewhere along the line that is leaking
> > articles out of its region and the poster may not have any way to
> > solve the problem.
>
> I would say that at least 20% of all messages on Usenet are somewhat
> flaming. It is because we men have more testosterone than we know what to
> do
> with. Only women do not flame, unless they are dykes of course.
>
> > * Along the above lines, please try to restrict your postings to your
> > site/region/state/whatever. People in Australia may not want to see
> > bike-for-sale ads from the U.S., for example.
>
> Again, nothing but more nonsense. Those idiots in Australia need to have
> their asses kicked on a regular basis since they are so g.d. stupid.
>
> > * Make your subject line informative about the content of your article.
>
> The subject line will have absolutely nothing to do with what is being
> said
> after the initial post. Even an idiot like Tom Sherman knows that much.
>
> > * If you are following up an article to create a new article, please
> > remember to delete the "References:" line in the header. This will
> > help the readers who use a threaded news reader; otherwise your new
> > topic will be mixed in with an old one.
>
> No one does any of the above **** - and why should they? It is just all
> ****
> anyway!
>
> > * Please don't flame others. We're a somewhat opinionated group, and
> > there are many diverse personalities here. This is especially true
> > in the never-ending helmet wars.
>
> If there weren't any flames happening, these freaking newsgroups would all
> die of terminal boredom.
> [...]
>
> Who is this ******* Mike Iglesias anyway and what is he doing here? Does
> he
> have some official capacity or is he just your ordinary busybody who
> thinks
> he knows what is best for us?
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

I thought you said you were going away. Or is it just that you are
such a simple little attention whore like ann coulter, so much that
you have to keep polluting bandwidth with your completely useless,
insipid, and vacuous opinions? If you were as great and moral as you
claim to be, you would not have lied and proved yourself to be the
insecure boring little (and I do mean LITTLE) hypocrite that you
clearly are. I shall not engage you past this, as you are clearly so
far beneath my level of intellect and integrity as not not be of any
benefit to me whatsoever. Since you seem so willing to offer
unsolicited (and unwanted) opinions, mine is that this world would be
a much better place if if ego maniacal piss ants like you never
existed. Rest assured, I do not hate you, I have no feeling towards
you whatsoever, and could care less if you live or die. You are that
insignificant to me and pretty much everyone on this list. I suspect
your insignificance extends well beyond cyberspace, to your real-world
surroundings. If you had any sort of real importance to anyone around
you, you wouldn't have the time you obviously do to pollute this group
as well as the others. So sad that your life is so empty and loveless.
I would say 'pitiful', but that would imply that I had some sort of
empathy for your state, alas, I do not. I only care that the others on
this list may see your presence with annoyance, and that your lies
only further the feelings of loathing others may have for you.

[Edward Dolan]

"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
news:bLidncXbN9ZMEzrbnZ2dnUVZ_ournZ2d@prairiewave. com...

Imagine a jerk who would send an email to me like this? I have posted it to
the cycling newgroups without asking his permission because such a jerk is
even too jerky for me!


> On Jul 24, 6:29 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "Mike Iglesias" <igles...@draco.acs.uci.edu> wrote in message
>>
>> news:rec-bicycles-weekly-1070723@draco.acs.uci.edu...
>> [...]
>>
>> > Nettiquette
>> [...]
>> > * If you are asking a basic question, please check the FAQ first. If
>> > the
>> > FAQ is has expired on your system, see the "Archives" section below
>> > for information on how to get a copy.
>>
>> Nonsense, everyone is asking basic questions all the time, If no one did
>> that, every newsgroup would quickly die a sudden death. Only a complete
>> idiot like Tom Sherman would ever go to the archives.
>>
>> > * If someone posts a question about something that was resolved
>> > recently,
>> > please answer the poster via email. Rehashing something that was
>> > just
>> > discussed is a waste of bandwidth unless you have something new to
>> > add.
>>
>> NEVER answer anything via email. You may get yourself murdered that way.
>>
>> By the way, 99% of all posters never add anything new. They just rehash
>> and
>> rehash until you want to puke.
>>
>> > * Please don't flame someone if their posting should have been
>> > restricted
>> > to a certain region (for example, california only). Most people are
>> > not
>> > the news admin on their system, so publicly flaming them does no
>> > good.
>> > A nicely worded email message to them that there may be a problem
>> > would allow them to notify their news admin. Please remember that
>> > it may be some other site somewhere along the line that is leaking
>> > articles out of its region and the poster may not have any way to
>> > solve the problem.
>>
>> I would say that at least 20% of all messages on Usenet are somewhat
>> flaming. It is because we men have more testosterone than we know what to
>> do
>> with. Only women do not flame, unless they are dykes of course.
>>
>> > * Along the above lines, please try to restrict your postings to your
>> > site/region/state/whatever. People in Australia may not want to see
>> > bike-for-sale ads from the U.S., for example.
>>
>> Again, nothing but more nonsense. Those idiots in Australia need to have
>> their asses kicked on a regular basis since they are so g.d. stupid.
>>
>> > * Make your subject line informative about the content of your
>> > article.
>>
>> The subject line will have absolutely nothing to do with what is being
>> said
>> after the initial post. Even an idiot like Tom Sherman knows that much.
>>
>> > * If you are following up an article to create a new article, please
>> > remember to delete the "References:" line in the header. This will
>> > help the readers who use a threaded news reader; otherwise your new
>> > topic will be mixed in with an old one.
>>
>> No one does any of the above **** - and why should they? It is just all
>> ****
>> anyway!
>>
>> > * Please don't flame others. We're a somewhat opinionated group, and
>> > there are many diverse personalities here. This is especially true
>> > in the never-ending helmet wars.
>>
>> If there weren't any flames happening, these freaking newsgroups would
>> all
>> die of terminal boredom.
>> [...]
>>
>> Who is this ******* Mike Iglesias anyway and what is he doing here? Does
>> he
>> have some official capacity or is he just your ordinary busybody who
>> thinks
>> he knows what is best for us?
>
> I thought you said you were going away. Or is it just that you are
> such a simple little attention whore like ann coulter, so much that
> you have to keep polluting bandwidth with your completely useless,
> insipid, and vacuous opinions?

Ann Coulter is one of the very greatest wits presently on the political
scene. I can never read her without getting at least a bit of a laugh. She
is a genius at what she does.

If you were as great and moral as you
> claim to be, you would not have lied and proved yourself to be the
> insecure boring little (and I do mean LITTLE) hypocrite that you
> clearly are.

Tut, tut ... compliments like the above will get you nowhere with me. I am
above any and all kinds of flattery.

I shall not engage you past this, as you are clearly so
> far beneath my level of intellect and integrity as not not be of any
> benefit to me whatsoever. Since you seem so willing to offer
> unsolicited (and unwanted) opinions, mine is that this world would be
> a much better place if if ego maniacal piss ants like you never
> existed.

Tut, tut ... compliments like the above will get you nowhere with me. I am
above any and all kinds of flattery.

Rest assured, I do not hate you, I have no feeling towards
> you whatsoever, and could care less if you live or die. You are that
> insignificant to me and pretty much everyone on this list. I suspect
> your insignificance extends well beyond cyberspace, to your real-world
> surroundings. If you had any sort of real importance to anyone around
> you, you wouldn't have the time you obviously do to pollute this group
> as well as the others. So sad that your life is so empty and loveless.
> I would say 'pitiful', but that would imply that I had some sort of
> empathy for your state, alas, I do not. I only care that the others on
> this list may see your presence with annoyance, and that your lies
> only further the feelings of loathing others may have for you.

Jesus Christ almighty, does not this sound like something that Jim McNamara
of ARBR would write to me? Apparently, I have many admirers out there in
the big world of Usenet.

But I ask you, what does any of this have to do with Mike Eglesias and his
mother hen posts to the cycling newsgroups. Yea, I would really like to know
who he is and what he thinks he is doing on these cycling newsgroups by
posting his proscriptions every ****ing week.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[JimmyMac]

On Jul 25, 2:17 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote in message
>
> news:bLidncXbN9ZMEzrbnZ2dnUVZ_ournZ2d@prairiewave. com...
>
> Imagine a jerk who would send an email to me like this? I have posted it to
> the cycling newgroups without asking his permission because such a jerk is
> even too jerky for me!
>
>
>
> > On Jul 24, 6:29 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "Mike Iglesias" <igles...@draco.acs.uci.edu> wrote in message
>
> >>news:rec-bicycles-weekly-1070723@draco.acs.uci.edu...
> >> [...]
>
> >> > Nettiquette
> >> [...]
> >> > * If you are asking a basic question, please check the FAQ first. If
> >> > the
> >> > FAQ is has expired on your system, see the "Archives" section below
> >> > for information on how to get a copy.
>
> >> Nonsense, everyone is asking basic questions all the time, If no one did
> >> that, every newsgroup would quickly die a sudden death. Only a complete
> >> idiot like Tom Sherman would ever go to the archives.
>
> >> > * If someone posts a question about something that was resolved
> >> > recently,
> >> > please answer the poster via email. Rehashing something that was
> >> > just
> >> > discussed is a waste of bandwidth unless you have something new to
> >> > add.
>
> >> NEVER answer anything via email. You may get yourself murdered that way.
>
> >> By the way, 99% of all posters never add anything new. They just rehash
> >> and
> >> rehash until you want to puke.
>
> >> > * Please don't flame someone if their posting should have been
> >> > restricted
> >> > to a certain region (for example, california only). Most people are
> >> > not
> >> > the news admin on their system, so publicly flaming them does no
> >> > good.
> >> > A nicely worded email message to them that there may be a problem
> >> > would allow them to notify their news admin. Please remember that
> >> > it may be some other site somewhere along the line that is leaking
> >> > articles out of its region and the poster may not have any way to
> >> > solve the problem.
>
> >> I would say that at least 20% of all messages on Usenet are somewhat
> >> flaming. It is because we men have more testosterone than we know what to
> >> do
> >> with. Only women do not flame, unless they are dykes of course.
>
> >> > * Along the above lines, please try to restrict your postings to your
> >> > site/region/state/whatever. People in Australia may not want to see
> >> > bike-for-sale ads from the U.S., for example.
>
> >> Again, nothing but more nonsense. Those idiots in Australia need to have
> >> their asses kicked on a regular basis since they are so g.d. stupid.
>
> >> > * Make your subject line informative about the content of your
> >> > article.
>
> >> The subject line will have absolutely nothing to do with what is being
> >> said
> >> after the initial post. Even an idiot like Tom Sherman knows that much.
>
> >> > * If you are following up an article to create a new article, please
> >> > remember to delete the "References:" line in the header. This will
> >> > help the readers who use a threaded news reader; otherwise your new
> >> > topic will be mixed in with an old one.
>
> >> No one does any of the above **** - and why should they? It is just all
> >> ****
> >> anyway!
>
> >> > * Please don't flame others. We're a somewhat opinionated group, and
> >> > there are many diverse personalities here. This is especially true
> >> > in the never-ending helmet wars.
>
> >> If there weren't any flames happening, these freaking newsgroups would
> >> all
> >> die of terminal boredom.
> >> [...]
>
> >> Who is this ******* Mike Iglesias anyway and what is he doing here? Does
> >> he
> >> have some official capacity or is he just your ordinary busybody who
> >> thinks
> >> he knows what is best for us?
>
> > I thought you said you were going away. Or is it just that you are
> > such a simple little attention whore like ann coulter, so much that
> > you have to keep polluting bandwidth with your completely useless,
> > insipid, and vacuous opinions?
>
> Ann Coulter is one of the very greatest wits presently on the political
> scene. I can never read her without getting at least a bit of a laugh. She
> is a genius at what she does.
>
> If you were as great and moral as you
>
> > claim to be, you would not have lied and proved yourself to be the
> > insecure boring little (and I do mean LITTLE) hypocrite that you
> > clearly are.
>
> Tut, tut ... compliments like the above will get you nowhere with me. I am
> above any and all kinds of flattery.
>
> I shall not engage you past this, as you are clearly so
>
> > far beneath my level of intellect and integrity as not not be of any
> > benefit to me whatsoever. Since you seem so willing to offer
> > unsolicited (and unwanted) opinions, mine is that this world would be
> > a much better place if if ego maniacal piss ants like you never
> > existed.
>
> Tut, tut ... compliments like the above will get you nowhere with me. I am
> above any and all kinds of flattery.
>
> Rest assured, I do not hate you, I have no feeling towards
>
> > you whatsoever, and could care less if you live or die. You are that
> > insignificant to me and pretty much everyone on this list. I suspect
> > your insignificance extends well beyond cyberspace, to your real-world
> > surroundings. If you had any sort of real importance to anyone around
> > you, you wouldn't have the time you obviously do to pollute this group
> > as well as the others. So sad that your life is so empty and loveless.
> > I would say 'pitiful', but that would imply that I had some sort of
> > empathy for your state, alas, I do not. I only care that the others on
> > this list may see your presence with annoyance, and that your lies
> > only further the feelings of loathing others may have for you.
>
> Jesus Christ almighty, does not this sound like something that Jim McNamara
> of ARBR would write to me? Apparently, I have many admirers out there in
> the big world of Usenet.

Yep. Apparently, Mike and I (and many others) share a like opinion
(misconstrued as admiration) about Ed Dolan and the dunderhead fails
to recognize that he is the common denominator. How pitiful. The
conundrum continues.

> But I ask you, what does any of this have to do with Mike Eglesias and his
> mother hen posts to the cycling newsgroups. Yea, I would really like to know
> who he is and what he thinks he is doing on these cycling newsgroups by
> posting his proscriptions every ****ing week.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[Edward Dolan]

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1185487196.026902.177510@d55g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
> On Jul 25, 2:17 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:bLidncXbN9ZMEzrbnZ2dnUVZ_ournZ2d@prairiewave. com...
>>
>> Imagine a jerk who would send an email to me like this? I have posted it
>> to
>> the cycling newgroups without asking his permission because such a jerk
>> is
>> even too jerky for me!
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jul 24, 6:29 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> "Mike Iglesias" <igles...@draco.acs.uci.edu> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:rec-bicycles-weekly-1070723@draco.acs.uci.edu...
>> >> [...]
>>
>> >> > Nettiquette
>> >> [...]
>> >> > * If you are asking a basic question, please check the FAQ first.
>> >> > If
>> >> > the
>> >> > FAQ is has expired on your system, see the "Archives" section
>> >> > below
>> >> > for information on how to get a copy.
>>
>> >> Nonsense, everyone is asking basic questions all the time, If no one
>> >> did
>> >> that, every newsgroup would quickly die a sudden death. Only a
>> >> complete
>> >> idiot like Tom Sherman would ever go to the archives.
>>
>> >> > * If someone posts a question about something that was resolved
>> >> > recently,
>> >> > please answer the poster via email. Rehashing something that was
>> >> > just
>> >> > discussed is a waste of bandwidth unless you have something new
>> >> > to
>> >> > add.
>>
>> >> NEVER answer anything via email. You may get yourself murdered that
>> >> way.
>>
>> >> By the way, 99% of all posters never add anything new. They just
>> >> rehash
>> >> and
>> >> rehash until you want to puke.
>>
>> >> > * Please don't flame someone if their posting should have been
>> >> > restricted
>> >> > to a certain region (for example, california only). Most people
>> >> > are
>> >> > not
>> >> > the news admin on their system, so publicly flaming them does no
>> >> > good.
>> >> > A nicely worded email message to them that there may be a problem
>> >> > would allow them to notify their news admin. Please remember
>> >> > that
>> >> > it may be some other site somewhere along the line that is
>> >> > leaking
>> >> > articles out of its region and the poster may not have any way to
>> >> > solve the problem.
>>
>> >> I would say that at least 20% of all messages on Usenet are somewhat
>> >> flaming. It is because we men have more testosterone than we know what
>> >> to
>> >> do
>> >> with. Only women do not flame, unless they are dykes of course.
>>
>> >> > * Along the above lines, please try to restrict your postings to
>> >> > your
>> >> > site/region/state/whatever. People in Australia may not want to
>> >> > see
>> >> > bike-for-sale ads from the U.S., for example.
>>
>> >> Again, nothing but more nonsense. Those idiots in Australia need to
>> >> have
>> >> their asses kicked on a regular basis since they are so g.d. stupid.
>>
>> >> > * Make your subject line informative about the content of your
>> >> > article.
>>
>> >> The subject line will have absolutely nothing to do with what is being
>> >> said
>> >> after the initial post. Even an idiot like Tom Sherman knows that
>> >> much.
>>
>> >> > * If you are following up an article to create a new article,
>> >> > please
>> >> > remember to delete the "References:" line in the header. This
>> >> > will
>> >> > help the readers who use a threaded news reader; otherwise your
>> >> > new
>> >> > topic will be mixed in with an old one.
>>
>> >> No one does any of the above **** - and why should they? It is just
>> >> all
>> >> ****
>> >> anyway!
>>
>> >> > * Please don't flame others. We're a somewhat opinionated group,
>> >> > and
>> >> > there are many diverse personalities here. This is especially
>> >> > true
>> >> > in the never-ending helmet wars.
>>
>> >> If there weren't any flames happening, these freaking newsgroups would
>> >> all
>> >> die of terminal boredom.
>> >> [...]
>>
>> >> Who is this ******* Mike Iglesias anyway and what is he doing here?
>> >> Does
>> >> he
>> >> have some official capacity or is he just your ordinary busybody who
>> >> thinks
>> >> he knows what is best for us?
>>
>> > I thought you said you were going away. Or is it just that you are
>> > such a simple little attention whore like ann coulter, so much that
>> > you have to keep polluting bandwidth with your completely useless,
>> > insipid, and vacuous opinions?
>>
>> Ann Coulter is one of the very greatest wits presently on the political
>> scene. I can never read her without getting at least a bit of a laugh.
>> She
>> is a genius at what she does.
>>
>> If you were as great and moral as you
>>
>> > claim to be, you would not have lied and proved yourself to be the
>> > insecure boring little (and I do mean LITTLE) hypocrite that you
>> > clearly are.
>>
>> Tut, tut ... compliments like the above will get you nowhere with me. I
>> am
>> above any and all kinds of flattery.
>>
>> I shall not engage you past this, as you are clearly so
>>
>> > far beneath my level of intellect and integrity as not not be of any
>> > benefit to me whatsoever. Since you seem so willing to offer
>> > unsolicited (and unwanted) opinions, mine is that this world would be
>> > a much better place if if ego maniacal piss ants like you never
>> > existed.
>>
>> Tut, tut ... compliments like the above will get you nowhere with me. I
>> am
>> above any and all kinds of flattery.
>>
>> Rest assured, I do not hate you, I have no feeling towards
>>
>> > you whatsoever, and could care less if you live or die. You are that
>> > insignificant to me and pretty much everyone on this list. I suspect
>> > your insignificance extends well beyond cyberspace, to your real-world
>> > surroundings. If you had any sort of real importance to anyone around
>> > you, you wouldn't have the time you obviously do to pollute this group
>> > as well as the others. So sad that your life is so empty and loveless.
>> > I would say 'pitiful', but that would imply that I had some sort of
>> > empathy for your state, alas, I do not. I only care that the others on
>> > this list may see your presence with annoyance, and that your lies
>> > only further the feelings of loathing others may have for you.
>>
>> Jesus Christ almighty, does not this sound like something that Jim
>> McNamara
>> of ARBR would write to me? Apparently, I have many admirers out there in
>> the big world of Usenet.
>
> Yep. Apparently, Mike and I (and many others) share a like opinion
> (misconstrued as admiration) about Ed Dolan and the dunderhead fails
> to recognize that he is the common denominator. How pitiful. The
> conundrum continues.

The fact that you read though all this **** proves that you do admire me. Aw
shucks, I am not really that great!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

>> But I ask you, what does any of this have to do with Mike Eglesias and
>> his
>> mother hen posts to the cycling newsgroups. Yea, I would really like to
>> know
>> who he is and what he thinks he is doing on these cycling newsgroups by
>> posting his proscriptions every ****ing week.

[JimmyMac]

On Jul 26, 6:20 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1185487196.026902.177510@d55g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jul 25, 2:17 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote in message
>
> >>news:bLidncXbN9ZMEzrbnZ2dnUVZ_ournZ2d@prairiewave. com...
>
> >> Imagine a jerk who would send an email to me like this? I have posted it
> >> to
> >> the cycling newgroups without asking his permission because such a jerk
> >> is
> >> even too jerky for me!
>
> >> > On Jul 24, 6:29 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> >> "Mike Iglesias" <igles...@draco.acs.uci.edu> wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:rec-bicycles-weekly-1070723@draco.acs.uci.edu...
> >> >> [...]
>
> >> >> > Nettiquette
> >> >> [...]
> >> >> > * If you are asking a basic question, please check the FAQ first.
> >> >> > If
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > FAQ is has expired on your system, see the "Archives" section
> >> >> > below
> >> >> > for information on how to get a copy.
>
> >> >> Nonsense, everyone is asking basic questions all the time, If no one
> >> >> did
> >> >> that, every newsgroup would quickly die a sudden death. Only a
> >> >> complete
> >> >> idiot like Tom Sherman would ever go to the archives.
>
> >> >> > * If someone posts a question about something that was resolved
> >> >> > recently,
> >> >> > please answer the poster via email. Rehashing something that was
> >> >> > just
> >> >> > discussed is a waste of bandwidth unless you have something new
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > add.
>
> >> >> NEVER answer anything via email. You may get yourself murdered that
> >> >> way.
>
> >> >> By the way, 99% of all posters never add anything new. They just
> >> >> rehash
> >> >> and
> >> >> rehash until you want to puke.
>
> >> >> > * Please don't flame someone if their posting should have been
> >> >> > restricted
> >> >> > to a certain region (for example, california only). Most people
> >> >> > are
> >> >> > not
> >> >> > the news admin on their system, so publicly flaming them does no
> >> >> > good.
> >> >> > A nicely worded email message to them that there may be a problem
> >> >> > would allow them to notify their news admin. Please remember
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > it may be some other site somewhere along the line that is
> >> >> > leaking
> >> >> > articles out of its region and the poster may not have any way to
> >> >> > solve the problem.
>
> >> >> I would say that at least 20% of all messages on Usenet are somewhat
> >> >> flaming. It is because we men have more testosterone than we know what
> >> >> to
> >> >> do
> >> >> with. Only women do not flame, unless they are dykes of course.
>
> >> >> > * Along the above lines, please try to restrict your postings to
> >> >> > your
> >> >> > site/region/state/whatever. People in Australia may not want to
> >> >> > see
> >> >> > bike-for-sale ads from the U.S., for example.
>
> >> >> Again, nothing but more nonsense. Those idiots in Australia need to
> >> >> have
> >> >> their asses kicked on a regular basis since they are so g.d. stupid.
>
> >> >> > * Make your subject line informative about the content of your
> >> >> > article.
>
> >> >> The subject line will have absolutely nothing to do with what is being
> >> >> said
> >> >> after the initial post. Even an idiot like Tom Sherman knows that
> >> >> much.
>
> >> >> > * If you are following up an article to create a new article,
> >> >> > please
> >> >> > remember to delete the "References:" line in the header. This
> >> >> > will
> >> >> > help the readers who use a threaded news reader; otherwise your
> >> >> > new
> >> >> > topic will be mixed in with an old one.
>
> >> >> No one does any of the above **** - and why should they? It is just
> >> >> all
> >> >> ****
> >> >> anyway!
>
> >> >> > * Please don't flame others. We're a somewhat opinionated group,
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > there are many diverse personalities here. This is especially
> >> >> > true
> >> >> > in the never-ending helmet wars.
>
> >> >> If there weren't any flames happening, these freaking newsgroups would
> >> >> all
> >> >> die of terminal boredom.
> >> >> [...]
>
> >> >> Who is this ******* Mike Iglesias anyway and what is he doing here?
> >> >> Does
> >> >> he
> >> >> have some official capacity or is he just your ordinary busybody who
> >> >> thinks
> >> >> he knows what is best for us?
>
> >> > I thought you said you were going away. Or is it just that you are
> >> > such a simple little attention whore like ann coulter, so much that
> >> > you have to keep polluting bandwidth with your completely useless,
> >> > insipid, and vacuous opinions?
>
> >> Ann Coulter is one of the very greatest wits presently on the political
> >> scene. I can never read her without getting at least a bit of a laugh.
> >> She
> >> is a genius at what she does.
>
> >> If you were as great and moral as you
>
> >> > claim to be, you would not have lied and proved yourself to be the
> >> > insecure boring little (and I do mean LITTLE) hypocrite that you
> >> > clearly are.
>
> >> Tut, tut ... compliments like the above will get you nowhere with me. I
> >> am
> >> above any and all kinds of flattery.
>
> >> I shall not engage you past this, as you are clearly so
>
> >> > far beneath my level of intellect and integrity as not not be of any
> >> > benefit to me whatsoever. Since you seem so willing to offer
> >> > unsolicited (and unwanted) opinions, mine is that this world would be
> >> > a much better place if if ego maniacal piss ants like you never
> >> > existed.
>
> >> Tut, tut ... compliments like the above will get you nowhere with me. I
> >> am
> >> above any and all kinds of flattery.
>
> >> Rest assured, I do not hate you, I have no feeling towards
>
> >> > you whatsoever, and could care less if you live or die. You are that
> >> > insignificant to me and pretty much everyone on this list. I suspect
> >> > your insignificance extends well beyond cyberspace, to your real-world
> >> > surroundings. If you had any sort of real importance to anyone around
> >> > you, you wouldn't have the time you obviously do to pollute this group
> >> > as well as the others. So sad that your life is so empty and loveless.
> >> > I would say 'pitiful', but that would imply that I had some sort of
> >> > empathy for your state, alas, I do not. I only care that the others on
> >> > this list may see your presence with annoyance, and that your lies
> >> > only further the feelings of loathing others may have for you.
>
> >> Jesus Christ almighty, does not this sound like something that Jim
> >> McNamara
> >> of ARBR would write to me? Apparently, I have many admirers out there in
> >> the big world of Usenet.
>
> > Yep. Apparently, Mike and I (and many others) share a like opinion
> > (misconstrued as admiration) about Ed Dolan and the dunderhead fails
> > to recognize that he is the common denominator. How pitiful. The
> > conundrum continues.
>
> The fact that you read though all this **** proves that you do admire me. Aw
> shucks, I am not really that great!

If Dolan really believes this crap then all that proves is that he is
delusional. HEAD Dolan should not flatter himself, but then again who
else will do it if he doesn't? The conundrum continues!

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> >> But I ask you, what does any of this have to do with Mike Eglesias and
> >> his
> >> mother hen posts to the cycling newsgroups. Yea, I would really like to
> >> know
> >> who he is and what he thinks he is doing on these cycling newsgroups by
> >> posting his proscriptions every ****ing week.