BREAKING NEWS Soler got caught

[ctrl-alt-delete]

http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1

[Davey Crockett]

"ctrl-alt-delete" <ctrl-alt-delete@hotmail.com> writes:

> http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1
>
>

Another Hero for the Wall of Shame


--
Davey Crockett - No 4Q to Reply

[DirtRoadie]

On Jul 27, 2:00 pm, "ctrl-alt-delete" <ctrl-alt-del...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1

The story has not been confirmed, but it has been echoed (in English)
@:

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct=us/0-0&fp=46aae148186ff48d&ei=5ZuqRpOhMYG0pgL34YS7Bg&url=http%3A//www.cyclingpost.com/tour/article_005202.shtml&cid=1118539508

(This may be an example of no additional sources, but confirmation
merely by repetition - "It's on the Internet, it must be true")

DR

[Bob Schwartz]

ctrl-alt-delete wrote:
> http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1

That would leave Contador in dots.

This could be the first time since 1969 that a single rider
took all the jerseys. There are only 11 riders ahead of him
on points. It'd be tough, but I think WADA's up to it.

I guess Discovery is the only completely clean team.

Bob Schwartz

[H Jonkers]

On Jul 27, 10:00 pm, "ctrl-alt-delete" <ctrl-alt-del...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1

The article says that Soler was not among the riders controlled after
the 14th stage, namely Rasmussen, Contador, Valverde, Verdugo,
Schleck, Valjavec, Le Mevel and Scheirlinckx. So how could it be him?

[raamman@gmail.com]

On Jul 27, 4:14 pm, Davey Crockett <d4Qaveycrock...@azurservers.com>
wrote:
> "ctrl-alt-delete" <ctrl-alt-del...@hotmail.com> writes:
> >http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1
>
> Another Hero for the Wall of Shame
>
> --
> Davey Crockett - No 4Q to Reply

babelfish translation:
There a new doping matter in gestation in the tour seems the France.
After the fourteenth stage with arrival on plateau the Beille were
decreased according to several sources a positive urine test. That
then after Vinokourov and Moreni the third positive case in the tour
would be.

It would concern Mauricio Soler, the drager of the bolletjestrui. At
this moment there is an irruption of the French police force in the
hotel of Barloworld to pace communicates our Danish colleagues of BT.
But we could not get that confirmed. Tomorrow at 11 o'clock there is
anyway a press conference.

The rumour which Soler positively would be has already looked after
that bookmakers in United Kingdom and Italy have crossed out him.

[shane]

It means nothing until you see it in L'equipe..


raam...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jul 27, 4:14 pm, Davey Crockett <d4Qaveycrock...@azurservers.com>
> wrote:
> > "ctrl-alt-delete" <ctrl-alt-del...@hotmail.com> writes:
> > >http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1
> >
> > Another Hero for the Wall of Shame
> >
> > --
> > Davey Crockett - No 4Q to Reply
>
> babelfish translation:
> There a new doping matter in gestation in the tour seems the France.
> After the fourteenth stage with arrival on plateau the Beille were
> decreased according to several sources a positive urine test. That
> then after Vinokourov and Moreni the third positive case in the tour
> would be.
>
> It would concern Mauricio Soler, the drager of the bolletjestrui. At
> this moment there is an irruption of the French police force in the
> hotel of Barloworld to pace communicates our Danish colleagues of BT.
> But we could not get that confirmed. Tomorrow at 11 o'clock there is
> anyway a press conference.
>
> The rumour which Soler positively would be has already looked after
> that bookmakers in United Kingdom and Italy have crossed out him.

[Stu Fleming]

Bob Schwartz wrote:

> I guess Discovery is the only completely clean team.

I hope that irony grokking shields are "up".

[William R. Mattil]

Bob Schwartz wrote:
>
> I guess Discovery is the only completely clean team.
>


Shhhhhh......

Don't let the French know or that could change.



Bill

[Davey Crockett]

H Jonkers <fha_j@yahoo.com> writes:

> On Jul 27, 10:00 pm, "ctrl-alt-delete" <ctrl-alt-del...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>> http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1
>
> The article says that Soler was not among the riders controlled after
> the 14th stage, namely Rasmussen, Contador, Valverde, Verdugo,
> Schleck, Valjavec, Le Mevel and Scheirlinckx. So how could it be him?
>

The article says that in _addition_ to the Jerseys those riders were
controlled

--
Davey Crockett - No 4Q to Reply

[H Jonkers]

On 28 jul, 11:13, Davey Crockett <d4Qaveycrock...@azurservers.com>
wrote:
> H Jonkers <fh...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > On Jul 27, 10:00 pm, "ctrl-alt-delete" <ctrl-alt-del...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1
>
> > The article says that Soler was not among the riders controlled after
> > the 14th stage, namely Rasmussen, Contador, Valverde, Verdugo,
> > Schleck, Valjavec, Le Mevel and Scheirlinckx. So how could it be him?
>
> The article says that in _addition_ to the Jerseys those riders were
> controlled

Actually, it doesn't say that at all (and I can read Dutch). And as
far as I know only the yellow jersey gets a daily doping test, not
the others. Besides, Soler wasn't even wearing the polka-dot jersey at
that time; he was just substituting for Rasmussen who then led both
the General and KoM rankings.

[Jeff Jones]

On Jul 28, 11:23 am, H Jonkers <fh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 28 jul, 11:13, Davey Crockett <d4Qaveycrock...@azurservers.com>
> wrote:
>
> > H Jonkers <fh...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > > On Jul 27, 10:00 pm, "ctrl-alt-delete" <ctrl-alt-del...@hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >>http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1
>
> > > The article says that Soler was not among the riders controlled after
> > > the 14th stage, namely Rasmussen, Contador, Valverde, Verdugo,
> > > Schleck, Valjavec, Le Mevel and Scheirlinckx. So how could it be him?
>
> > The article says that in _addition_ to the Jerseys those riders were
> > controlled
>
> Actually, it doesn't say that at all (and I can read Dutch). And as
> far as I know only the yellow jersey gets a daily doping test, not
> the others. Besides, Soler wasn't even wearing the polka-dot jersey at
> that time; he was just substituting for Rasmussen who then led both
> the General and KoM rankings.

It's a strangely written story. It points towards Soler as the
positive rider, while at the same time saying he wasn't tested.

I ain't heard nothing more yet.

Jeff

[datakoll]

On Jul 28, 6:33 am, Jeff Jones <drjone...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 11:23 am, H Jonkers <fh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 28 jul, 11:13, Davey Crockett <d4Qaveycrock...@azurservers.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > H Jonkers <fh...@yahoo.com> writes:
> > > > On Jul 27, 10:00 pm, "ctrl-alt-delete" <ctrl-alt-del...@hotmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >>http://www.hln.be/hlns/cache/det/art_537132.html?wt.bron=homeArt1
>
> > > > The article says that Soler was not among the riders controlled after
> > > > the 14th stage, namely Rasmussen, Contador, Valverde, Verdugo,
> > > > Schleck, Valjavec, Le Mevel and Scheirlinckx. So how could it be him?
>
> > > The article says that in _addition_ to the Jerseys those riders were
> > > controlled
>
> > Actually, it doesn't say that at all (and I can read Dutch). And as
> > far as I know only the yellow jersey gets a daily doping test, not
> > the others. Besides, Soler wasn't even wearing the polka-dot jersey at
> > that time; he was just substituting for Rasmussen who then led both
> > the General and KoM rankings.
>
> It's a strangely written story. It points towards Soler as the
> positive rider, while at the same time saying he wasn't tested.
>
> I ain't heard nothing more yet.
>
> Jeff- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

SOLER IS FROM COLUMBIA WHERE COCOA IS GROWN AND PROCESSED INTO
BREAKFAST CEREAL

[RicodJour]

On Jul 28, 8:14 am, datakoll <datak...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 28, 6:33 am, Jeff Jones <drjone...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 28, 11:23 am, H Jonkers <fh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Actually, it doesn't say that at all (and I can read Dutch). And as
> > > far as I know only the yellow jersey gets a daily doping test, not
> > > the others. Besides, Soler wasn't even wearing the polka-dot jersey at
> > > that time; he was just substituting for Rasmussen who then led both
> > > the General and KoM rankings.
>
> > It's a strangely written story. It points towards Soler as the
> > positive rider, while at the same time saying he wasn't tested.

That's because it smells of a smear campaign.

> SOLER IS FROM COLUMBIA WHERE COCOA IS GROWN AND PROCESSED INTO
> BREAKFAST CEREAL

I like cocoa, aka cacao, but I've never tried it on cereal. Now if
you'd said coca, that would be different.

R

[Howard Kveck]

In article <1185624887.780099.21830@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.co m>,
datakoll <datakoll@yahoo.com> wrote:

> SOLER IS FROM COLUMBIA WHERE COCOA IS GROWN AND PROCESSED INTO
> BREAKFAST CEREAL

He tested positive for Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs? Alright!

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

[Donald Munro]

Howard Kveck wrote:
> He tested positive for Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs? Alright!

Sounds like something a fatty master would test positive for.

[RonSonic]

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:02:29 -0700, Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com>
wrote:

>In article <1185624887.780099.21830@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.co m>,
> datakoll <datakoll@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> SOLER IS FROM COLUMBIA WHERE COCOA IS GROWN AND PROCESSED INTO
>> BREAKFAST CEREAL
>
> He tested positive for Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs? Alright!

The second bowl is the best.

Ron

[r15757@aol.com]

On Jul 28, 9:54 am, Donald Munro <fat-dumb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Howard Kveck wrote:
> > He tested positive for Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs? Alright!
>
> Sounds like something a fatty master would test positive for.

Little Chocolate Donuts.

[William R. Mattil]

Howard Kveck wrote:
> He tested positive for Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs? Alright!

Ahhhhh Someone has read, or reads, Calvin and Hobbes.


Bill

[Mark]

RonSonic wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:02:29 -0700, Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In article <1185624887.780099.21830@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.co m>,
>> datakoll <datakoll@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> SOLER IS FROM COLUMBIA WHERE COCOA IS GROWN AND PROCESSED INTO
>>> BREAKFAST CEREAL
>> He tested positive for Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs? Alright!
>
> The second bowl is the best.

Now, Ron, I'll believe you if you tell me you've got a TUE for one bowl,
but there is no therapeutic reason for the second bowl - you're clearly
into PED territory there.

Mark J.

[Steven L. Sheffield]

On 07/28/2007 03:39 PM, in article
OIOqi.11757$eY.6627@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net, "William R. Mattil"
<wrmattil@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>
> Howard Kveck wrote:
>> He tested positive for Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs? Alright!
>
> Ahhhhh Someone has read, or reads, Calvin and Hobbes.



Good God ... Hasn't EVERYONE?????




--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea eye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot flahute dot com [foreword] slash

[Michael Press]

In article
<CZSdnWt-gP1ddTbbnZ2dnUVZ_gidnZ2d@comcast.com>,
Mark <remove.mandmlj.this@remove.comcast.this.net>
wrote:

> RonSonic wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:02:29 -0700, Howard Kveck <YOURhoward@h-SHOESbomb.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> In article <1185624887.780099.21830@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.co m>,
> >> datakoll <datakoll@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> SOLER IS FROM COLUMBIA WHERE COCOA IS GROWN AND PROCESSED INTO
> >>> BREAKFAST CEREAL
> >> He tested positive for Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs? Alright!
> >
> > The second bowl is the best.
>
> Now, Ron, I'll believe you if you tell me you've got a TUE for one bowl,
> but there is no therapeutic reason for the second bowl - you're clearly
> into PED territory there.

That is not the second bowl he is talking about.

--
Michael Press