You crybabies just don't get it

[kaiser]

Kunich, BillC (et all):

You all sit there and cry aloud about due process and fairness. Yet
you ignore the fact that top people are getting popped left and right
now. At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
the sport whatsoever. You have no limit to your tolerance (you
****ing hippies). I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
work in a trickle-like manner. The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
de France next summer. The sponsors just might heave-ho in one fell
swoop. That noise you may hear will not be a rapidly turning
kysirium, but rather the sound of the sponsors abandoning the sport in
droves:

http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=AlNXYwcz9BG.BaiD2SARyCx.grcF?slug=reu-toursponsorsdc&prov=reuters&type=lgns

[RicodJour]

On Jul 27, 7:21 pm, kaiser <pjman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kunich, BillC (et all):
>
> You all sit there and cry aloud about due process and fairness. Yet
> you ignore the fact that top people are getting popped left and right
> now. At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
> the sport whatsoever. You have no limit to your tolerance (you
> ****ing hippies). I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
> work in a trickle-like manner. The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
> de France next summer. The sponsors just might heave-ho in one fell
> swoop. That noise you may hear will not be a rapidly turning
> kysirium, but rather the sound of the sponsors abandoning the sport in
> droves:
>
> http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=AlNXYwcz9BG.BaiD2SARyCx.grcF?slu...

How's this - everyone agrees with you. You're ****ing brilliant.
Happy? Good, now go away until next July. Then you can come back and
say I told you so and won't that be just great?

R

[SLAVE of THE STATE]

On Jul 27, 4:21 pm, kaiser <pjman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kunich, BillC (et all):
>

> At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
> the sport whatsoever.

Credibility? I had no idea that was even a question to be asked.

> You have no limit to your tolerance (you
> ****ing hippies).

I'm sorry, I lost the plot. WTF are you talking about?

> I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
> work in a trickle-like manner.

Well no. I haven't thought about it at all.

> The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
> de France next summer.

I'll spend more time riding and less time watching. I'm just not
getting where you see a problem.

[dustoyevsky@mac.com]

On Jul 27, 6:21 pm, kaiser <pjman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kunich, BillC (et all):

> You have no limit to your tolerance (you
> ****ing hippies).

Tom Kunich, a hippie. Nyuck nyuck. Didja see that one, TK? Har har.

The riders are scapegoats. I don't care what they did, either.

(One more time): if the guy next to you (or way up the road <g>) can
"dope" with little chance of getting caught, which has apparently long
been the standard, what choice do you have?

Bad rules, bad enforcement. Bad leadership = losing sponsors. --D-y

[Tuschinski]

On Jul 28, 1:21 am, kaiser <pjman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kunich, BillC (et all):
>
> You all sit there and cry aloud about due process and fairness.

Wich the witchhunters, to wich you seem to belong besmirch.

Reality check, you are implying Due process and fairness can be
dismissed at will?

Dear god.....

> Yet
> you ignore the fact that top people are getting popped left and right
> now. At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
> the sport whatsoever. You have no limit to your tolerance (you
> ****ing hippies).

Yes, those who want to have a fair proces certainly are hippies.

To the gallow! All of them! The dead will be exonerated by god!

> I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
> work in a trickle-like manner. The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
> de France next summer. The sponsors just might heave-ho in one fell
> swoop. That noise you may hear will not be a rapidly turning
> kysirium, but rather the sound of the sponsors abandoning the sport in
> droves:
>
> http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=AlNXYwcz9BG.BaiD2SARyCx.grcF?slu...

And what does your righteous indignation do against it? How is
standing here with foam and spittle covering your monitor keeping
cycling healthy?

I'm not sure if you make me laugh or cry. But your views on the rights
of the riders is appaling and detestable.

[Tim]

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:21:59 -0000, kaiser <pjmanyun@gmail.com> wrote:

>Kunich, BillC (et all):
>
>You all sit there and cry aloud about due process and fairness. Yet
>you ignore the fact that top people are getting popped left and right
>now. At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
>the sport whatsoever. You have no limit to your tolerance (you
>****ing hippies). I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
>work in a trickle-like manner. The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
>de France next summer. The sponsors just might heave-ho in one fell
>swoop. That noise you may hear will not be a rapidly turning
>kysirium, but rather the sound of the sponsors abandoning the sport in
>droves:
>
>http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=AlNXYwcz9BG.BaiD2SARyCx.grcF?slug=reu-toursponsorsdc&prov=reuters&type=lgns

Due process and courts of law decide if someone is allowed to keep
their freedom or their assets. It has nothing to do with whether
someone is allowed to keep their job etc. A lower standard can be
applied. The NFL has every right to release or suspend a alleged dog
torturer and killer because it is bad for business. Sponsors have
every reason to drop an alleged dog torturer and killer as well as it
is bad for business. Having sponsors and a high paying job as a
professional athlete are not constitutional rights. Should OJs
sponsors resign him because he was found not guilty?

[datakoll]

On Jul 27, 7:21 pm, kaiser <pjman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kunich, BillC (et all):
>
> You all sit there and cry aloud about due process and fairness. Yet
> you ignore the fact that top people are getting popped left and right
> now. At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
> the sport whatsoever. You have no limit to your tolerance (you
> ****ing hippies). I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
> work in a trickle-like manner. The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
> de France next summer. The sponsors just might heave-ho in one fell
> swoop. That noise you may hear will not be a rapidly turning
> kysirium, but rather the sound of the sponsors abandoning the sport in
> droves:
>
> http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=AlNXYwcz9BG.BaiD2SARyCx.grcF?slu...

not likely.NEWTON again. what would the 162 undrugged cycle racers do
that wek? rob liquor stores?molest children, tune up the ferrari?
remember the angry mob that tore Rasmussen from his bike and threw him
down the cliff? what would they do? take laxatives? buy vodaphones?
drink Gerolstammer?

[RonSonic]

On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:21:59 -0000, kaiser <pjmanyun@gmail.com> wrote:

>Kunich, BillC (et all):
>
>You all sit there and cry aloud about due process and fairness. Yet
>you ignore the fact that top people are getting popped left and right
>now. At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
>the sport whatsoever.

Without a fair process for testing and administering the results there will be
no credibility. Credibility flows from the top down.

Pretty obviously a lot of riders did not really believe a new-regime anti-doping
sheriff was in town. No credibility from the sanctioning body. Even the riders
didn't believe them.

You have no limit to your tolerance (you
>****ing hippies). I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
>work in a trickle-like manner. The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
>de France next summer. The sponsors just might heave-ho in one fell
>swoop. That noise you may hear will not be a rapidly turning
>kysirium, but rather the sound of the sponsors abandoning the sport in
>droves:
>
>http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=AlNXYwcz9BG.BaiD2SARyCx.grcF?slug=reu-toursponsorsdc&prov=reuters&type=lgns

Will riders still race across France?
You know they will.
Cool.

Ron

[Michael Press]

In article
<1185578519.977660.71110@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.c om>,
kaiser <pjmanyun@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kunich, BillC (et all):
>
> You all sit there and cry aloud about due process and fairness. Yet
> you ignore the fact that top people are getting popped left and right
> now. At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
> the sport whatsoever. You have no limit to your tolerance (you
> ****ing hippies). I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
> work in a trickle-like manner. The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
> de France next summer. The sponsors just might heave-ho in one fell
> swoop. That noise you may hear will not be a rapidly turning
> kysirium, but rather the sound of the sponsors abandoning the sport in
> droves:
>
> http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=AlNXYwcz9BG.BaiD2SARyCx.grcF?slug=reu-toursponsorsdc&prov=reuters&type=lgns

But why do you care?

--
Michael Press

[anton2468@aol.com]

On Jul 27, 7:21 pm, kaiser <pjman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kunich, BillC (et all):
>
> You all sit there and cry aloud about due process and fairness. Yet
> you ignore the fact that top people are getting popped left and right
> now. At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
> the sport whatsoever. You have no limit to your tolerance (you
> ****ing hippies). I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
> work in a trickle-like manner. The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
> de France next summer. The sponsors just might heave-ho in one fell
> swoop. That noise you may hear will not be a rapidly turning
> kysirium, but rather the sound of the sponsors abandoning the sport in
> droves:
>
> http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=AlNXYwcz9BG.BaiD2SARyCx.grcF?slu...

And watching what is effectively Reality TV not Sport today, they
commentators are SO keen to blame the drugs on the oldies and the New
Young Riders are clean.

Bollox. Maybe you will have one clean tour before everyone thinks
everyone is doping and starts to dopw themselves. Its not just the
riders, any coach/team leader from the last 10 years should be removed
from the sport.
You don't cure a doping problem just because you catch two riders who
made mistakes with their doping. You need to catch the 30-40 riders
who didnt make the mistakes but still doped

[Tom Kunich]

"SLAVE of THE STATE" <gwhite@ti.com> wrote in message
news:1185586901.681623.126430@d30g2000prg.googlegr oups.com...
> On Jul 27, 4:21 pm, kaiser <pjman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Kunich, BillC (et all):
>>
>
>> At such a rapid pace that there can be no credibility left in
>> the sport whatsoever.
>
> Credibility? I had no idea that was even a question to be asked.
>
>> You have no limit to your tolerance (you
>> ****ing hippies).
>
> I'm sorry, I lost the plot. WTF are you talking about?
>
>> I suppose you think that sponsorship losses will
>> work in a trickle-like manner.
>
> Well no. I haven't thought about it at all.
>
>> The fact is, you might not GET a Tour
>> de France next summer.
>
> I'll spend more time riding and less time watching. I'm just not
> getting where you see a problem.

He's sort of like a boil - he's so full of pain, pus and canker that he will
use absolutely any excuse to explode anger in every direction.

But you have to admit that him, datakoll and a couple of others deserve to
be simply ignored as the pain in the ass little children that they do
obviously are.

[Kyle Legate]

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
>
>> You have no limit to your tolerance (you
>> ****ing hippies).
>
> I'm sorry, I lost the plot. WTF are you talking about?
>

Cut back on the weed, you ****ing hippy.

[DirtRoadie]

On Jul 27, 7:56 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:

> He's sort of like a boil - he's so full of pain, pus and canker that he will
> use absolutely any excuse to explode anger in every direction.
>
> But you have to admit that him, datakoll and a couple of others deserve to
> be simply ignored as the pain in the ass little children that they do
> obviously are.

What? Datakoll a PITA? Hardly! Incoherent at times (most of the
time), but not nearly the PITA that many others in this group are.
I appreciate those who share insight and information, even opinion.
But not worth my time are those (the armchair quarterbacks) who only
offer their obesessions - couched as opinions.

DR

[Donald Munro]

Tom Kunich wrote:
> He's sort of like a boil - he's so full of pain, pus and canker that he will
> use absolutely any excuse to explode anger in every direction.

Its great for the rbr July hit counter though.

[Tom Kunich]

"DirtRoadie" <DirtRoadie@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1185589948.923091.151810@d30g2000prg.googlegr oups.com...
> On Jul 27, 7:56 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
>> He's sort of like a boil - he's so full of pain, pus and canker that he
>> will
>> use absolutely any excuse to explode anger in every direction.
>>
>> But you have to admit that him, datakoll and a couple of others deserve
>> to
>> be simply ignored as the pain in the ass little children that they do
>> obviously are.
>
> What? Datakoll a PITA? Hardly! Incoherent at times (most of the
> time), but not nearly the PITA that many others in this group are.
> I appreciate those who share insight and information, even opinion.
> But not worth my time are those (the armchair quarterbacks) who only
> offer their obesessions - couched as opinions.

I'll think about that and read some of his rants.

[Ryan Cousineau]

In article <nOyqi.12682$zA4.12096@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink .net>,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:

> "DirtRoadie" <DirtRoadie@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1185589948.923091.151810@d30g2000prg.googlegr oups.com...
> > On Jul 27, 7:56 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> >
> >> He's sort of like a boil - he's so full of pain, pus and canker that he
> >> will
> >> use absolutely any excuse to explode anger in every direction.
> >>
> >> But you have to admit that him, datakoll and a couple of others deserve
> >> to
> >> be simply ignored as the pain in the ass little children that they do
> >> obviously are.
> >
> > What? Datakoll a PITA? Hardly! Incoherent at times (most of the
> > time), but not nearly the PITA that many others in this group are.
> > I appreciate those who share insight and information, even opinion.
> > But not worth my time are those (the armchair quarterbacks) who only
> > offer their obesessions - couched as opinions.
>
> I'll think about that and read some of his rants.

As in so many other things, liquor helps.

--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

[Tom Kunich]

"Ryan Cousineau" <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote in message
news:rcousine-5EB4D5.01225928072007@news.telus.net...
> In article <nOyqi.12682$zA4.12096@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink .net>,
> "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
>> "DirtRoadie" <DirtRoadie@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1185589948.923091.151810@d30g2000prg.googlegr oups.com...
>> > On Jul 27, 7:56 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> He's sort of like a boil - he's so full of pain, pus and canker that
>> >> he
>> >> will
>> >> use absolutely any excuse to explode anger in every direction.
>> >>
>> >> But you have to admit that him, datakoll and a couple of others
>> >> deserve
>> >> to
>> >> be simply ignored as the pain in the ass little children that they do
>> >> obviously are.
>> >
>> > What? Datakoll a PITA? Hardly! Incoherent at times (most of the
>> > time), but not nearly the PITA that many others in this group are.
>> > I appreciate those who share insight and information, even opinion.
>> > But not worth my time are those (the armchair quarterbacks) who only
>> > offer their obesessions - couched as opinions.
>>
>> I'll think about that and read some of his rants.
>
> As in so many other things, liquor helps.

After looking over some of his postings today I have to say there ain't
enough liquor in the world. What's more, since I'm taking an
anti-cholesterol drug that effectively triples the effect of alcohol that's
saying a lot.

[William R. Mattil]

Tim wrote:

> The NFL has every right to release or suspend a alleged dog
> torturer and killer because it is bad for business. Sponsors have
> every reason to drop an alleged dog torturer and killer as well as it
> is bad for business.
>

If Michael Vick is actually convicted, which is a longshot, he might
still be axed from the NFL because of the *gambling* That carries a
stiffer penalty than Dog Torture. Which is not to say that I don't think
he's guilty and should be punished. Hell is too good for that barbaric
*******.

Then if the NFL's "punishment" isn't enough then the fans will have the
right to respond as they should. Either way the NFL has the opportunity
to do the right thing here. Be interesting to see if the money involved
will influence their decision.


Hell even Nike is hedging by not withdrawing current Vick products.



Bill

[RicodJour]

On Jul 28, 9:33 am, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Will riders still race across France?
> You know they will.
> Cool.

You mean race around France. Hmmm...now that you mention it, I think
you've stumbled upon a new paradigm. All the riders dope at the
start, then they have to race across France and head for the borders
with the gendarmes and vampires in hot pursuit! It would be a cross
between Cyclysm Sunday, Missing Persons and Law & Order. The public
could use text messaging to alert the authorities - or mislead them in
favor of their favorite riders. The new technology employed would get
great coverage. Night vision cameras and stealth technology applied
to fookin bike racing!

R

[Ryan Cousineau]

In article <1185630159.268786.229080@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.c om>,
RicodJour <ricodjour@worldemail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 28, 9:33 am, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> > Will riders still race across France?
> > You know they will.
> > Cool.
>
> You mean race around France. Hmmm...now that you mention it, I think
> you've stumbled upon a new paradigm. All the riders dope at the
> start, then they have to race across France and head for the borders
> with the gendarmes and vampires in hot pursuit! It would be a cross
> between Cyclysm Sunday, Missing Persons and Law & Order. The public
> could use text messaging to alert the authorities - or mislead them in
> favor of their favorite riders. The new technology employed would get
> great coverage. Night vision cameras and stealth technology applied
> to fookin bike racing!
>
> R

The Riding Man! Too bad Richard Dawson isn't around to host.

As always, there will be no penalties, no substitutions, and no time
limits,

--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

[Michael Press]

In article
<xYKqi.41563$Um6.29858@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>,
"William R. Mattil" <wrmattil@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> Tim wrote:
>
> > The NFL has every right to release or suspend a alleged dog
> > torturer and killer because it is bad for business. Sponsors have
> > every reason to drop an alleged dog torturer and killer as well as it
> > is bad for business.
> >
>
> If Michael Vick is actually convicted, which is a longshot,

Not a long shot. He is going down. He will never take
another snap in the NFL. He is dog food.

> he might
> still be axed from the NFL because of the *gambling* That carries a
> stiffer penalty than Dog Torture. Which is not to say that I don't think
> he's guilty and should be punished. Hell is too good for that barbaric
> *******.
>
> Then if the NFL's "punishment" isn't enough then the fans will have the
> right to respond as they should. Either way the NFL has the opportunity
> to do the right thing here. Be interesting to see if the money involved
> will influence their decision.
>
>
> Hell even Nike is hedging by not withdrawing current Vick products.

--
Michael Press

[datakoll]

On Jul 28, 3:07 pm, Ryan Cousineau <rcous...@sfu.ca> wrote:
> In article <1185630159.268786.229...@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.c om>,
>
>
>
>
>
> RicodJour <ricodj...@worldemail.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 28, 9:33 am, RonSonic <ronso...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > > Will riders still race across France?
> > > You know they will.
> > > Cool.
>
> > You mean race around France. Hmmm...now that you mention it, I think
> > you've stumbled upon a new paradigm. All the riders dope at the
> > start, then they have to race across France and head for the borders
> > with the gendarmes and vampires in hot pursuit! It would be a cross
> > between Cyclysm Sunday, Missing Persons and Law & Order. The public
> > could use text messaging to alert the authorities - or mislead them in
> > favor of their favorite riders. The new technology employed would get
> > great coverage. Night vision cameras and stealth technology applied
> > to fookin bike racing!
>
> > R
>
> The Riding Man! Too bad Richard Dawson isn't around to host.
>
> As always, there will be no penalties, no substitutions, and no time
> limits,
>
> --
> Ryan Cousineau rcous...@sfu.cahttp://www.wiredcola.com/
> "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
> to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

FORMULA LIBRE! i hold the crowds were a substantial factor in
Rasmussen's undoing, manipulated by Prudhomme. When did P begin his
spiel? when the Tour passed thru Denmark?
A significant crowd increase could undo the Tour - Mille Miglia?
Its hard to kill something like the Tour as it exists in the
collective conscious ether waiting for ad money to pour in the
nigenerate results-like the apple harvest in your nabs backyard.
Just changing names or "ownership" is almost the same as rebirth. The
people involved are the masses who buy darryl earnhardt stuff maybe
worser. Most of us are privledge elitists with comouters and carbon
fiber cycles or poverty stricken LBS mechanics but the Euro fan may
actually ride a bicycle to work. I mean like look at the roadside's up
the Col de Prudhomme. More bikes may mean lower intelligence levels.
You know what we need to gauge here are the collective intelligence
levels of the peloton...
I'm going home never to return: prudhomme, trautig et al make me
physically ill.

[Ryan Cousineau]

In article <x%Rqi.11836$rR.3637@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.n et>,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:

> "Ryan Cousineau" <rcousine@sfu.ca> wrote in message
> news:rcousine-5EB4D5.01225928072007@news.telus.net...
> > In article <nOyqi.12682$zA4.12096@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink .net>,
> > "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> >
> >> "DirtRoadie" <DirtRoadie@aol.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1185589948.923091.151810@d30g2000prg.googlegr oups.com...
> >> > On Jul 27, 7:56 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> He's sort of like a boil - he's so full of pain, pus and canker that
> >> >> he
> >> >> will
> >> >> use absolutely any excuse to explode anger in every direction.
> >> >>
> >> >> But you have to admit that him, datakoll and a couple of others
> >> >> deserve
> >> >> to
> >> >> be simply ignored as the pain in the ass little children that they do
> >> >> obviously are.
> >> >
> >> > What? Datakoll a PITA? Hardly! Incoherent at times (most of the
> >> > time), but not nearly the PITA that many others in this group are.
> >> > I appreciate those who share insight and information, even opinion.
> >> > But not worth my time are those (the armchair quarterbacks) who only
> >> > offer their obesessions - couched as opinions.
> >>
> >> I'll think about that and read some of his rants.
> >
> > As in so many other things, liquor helps.
>
> After looking over some of his postings today I have to say there ain't
> enough liquor in the world. What's more, since I'm taking an
> anti-cholesterol drug that effectively triples the effect of alcohol that's
> saying a lot.

LIVEDRUNK demands to know more, and thinks we should have a symposium to
decide whether we should ban this drug, or petition for it to be
available over-the-counter.

--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

[Carl Sundquist]

"Michael Press" <rubrum@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:rubrum-3D79D7.22400328072007@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net ...
> In article
> <xYKqi.41563$Um6.29858@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>,
> "William R. Mattil" <wrmattil@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> Tim wrote:
>>
>> > The NFL has every right to release or suspend a alleged dog
>> > torturer and killer because it is bad for business. Sponsors have
>> > every reason to drop an alleged dog torturer and killer as well as it
>> > is bad for business.
>> >
>>
>> If Michael Vick is actually convicted, which is a longshot,
>
> Not a long shot. He is going down. He will never take
> another snap in the NFL. He is dog food.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him end up with the Dallas Cowboys.

[William R. Mattil]

Michael Press wrote:

>
> Not a long shot. He is going down. He will never take
> another snap in the NFL. He is dog food.
>


I love this image and hope that you are right.



Bill

[Donald Munro]

Tom Kunich wrote:
>> After looking over some of his postings today I have to say there ain't
>> enough liquor in the world. What's more, since I'm taking an
>> anti-cholesterol drug that effectively triples the effect of alcohol that's
>> saying a lot.

Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> LIVEDRUNK demands to know more, and thinks we should have a symposium to
> decide whether we should ban this drug, or petition for it to be
> available over-the-counter.

If it triples your performance it must be performance enhancing. Ban it
(and no medical exemptions allowed either).

[datakoll]

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/29/sports/sportsspecial1/29cheat.html?ref=sportsspecial1


the crowd doesn't ride bicycles, can't walk...

[Ryan Cousineau]

In article <46acb68e$0$8642$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com>,
Donald Munro <fat-dumbass@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Tom Kunich wrote:
> >> After looking over some of his postings today I have to say there ain't
> >> enough liquor in the world. What's more, since I'm taking an
> >> anti-cholesterol drug that effectively triples the effect of alcohol
> >> that's
> >> saying a lot.
>
> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> > LIVEDRUNK demands to know more, and thinks we should have a symposium to
> > decide whether we should ban this drug, or petition for it to be
> > available over-the-counter.
>
> If it triples your performance it must be performance enhancing. Ban it
> (and no medical exemptions allowed either).

Dumbass:

LIVEDRUNK isn't a sport, it's a way of life.

--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

[Howard Kveck]

In article <46acb68e$0$8642$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com>,
Donald Munro <fat-dumbass@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Tom Kunich wrote:
> >> After looking over some of his postings today I have to say there ain't
> >> enough liquor in the world. What's more, since I'm taking an
> >> anti-cholesterol drug that effectively triples the effect of alcohol
> >> that's
> >> saying a lot.
>
> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> > LIVEDRUNK demands to know more, and thinks we should have a symposium to
> > decide whether we should ban this drug, or petition for it to be
> > available over-the-counter.
>
> If it triples your performance it must be performance enhancing. Ban it
> (and no medical exemptions allowed either).

I was thinking that someone who went to Castlemont High in Oakland would have no
need for no steenking cholesterol meds. But on the other hand, it might explain why
so much of his output looks like drunk posting.

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

[Donald Munro]

Tom Kunich wrote:
>> >> After looking over some of his postings today I have to say there ain't
>> >> enough liquor in the world. What's more, since I'm taking an
>> >> anti-cholesterol drug that effectively triples the effect of alcohol
>> >> that's saying a lot.

>> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
>> > LIVEDRUNK demands to know more, and thinks we should have a symposium to
>> > decide whether we should ban this drug, or petition for it to be
>> > available over-the-counter.

Donald Munro wrote:
>> If it triples your performance it must be performance enhancing. Ban it
>> (and no medical exemptions allowed either).
>
Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> LIVEDRUNK isn't a sport, it's a way of life.

OK, but don't blame me if Lafferty transfers his cleanliness phobia from
LANCE to LIVEDRUNK.

[Ryan Cousineau]

In article <46acd64f$0$4355$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com>,
Donald Munro <fat-dumbass@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Tom Kunich wrote:
> >> >> After looking over some of his postings today I have to say there ain't
> >> >> enough liquor in the world. What's more, since I'm taking an
> >> >> anti-cholesterol drug that effectively triples the effect of alcohol
> >> >> that's saying a lot.
>
> >> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> >> > LIVEDRUNK demands to know more, and thinks we should have a symposium to
> >> > decide whether we should ban this drug, or petition for it to be
> >> > available over-the-counter.
>
> Donald Munro wrote:
> >> If it triples your performance it must be performance enhancing. Ban it
> >> (and no medical exemptions allowed either).
> >
> Ryan Cousineau wrote:
> > LIVEDRUNK isn't a sport, it's a way of life.
>
> OK, but don't blame me if Lafferty transfers his cleanliness phobia from
> LANCE to LIVEDRUNK.

LIVEDRUNK is at all times, and in all places, willing to be judged by
the quality of its enemies.

--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos