Edward Dolan
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
"Ozark Bicycle" <bicycleatelier@ozarkbicycleservice.com> wrote in message
news:01dbdc06-9429-4530-ae09-b49819c2139a@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Sherman could use a little self-awareness: according to Google,
> through the morning of 12/9/07 the pencil neck has outposted me on
> Usenet this month by a ratio of over 5.5-to-1. Now, who is it that has
> nothing to do?
>
>
> On Dec 9, 7:28 am, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Ozark Bicycle wrote:
>> > On Dec 8, 11:11 am, billyjoecl...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> On Dec 7, 8:40 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@yahoo.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >>> billyjoecl...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>>> On Dec 6, 8:12 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@yahoo.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>> billyjoecl...@gmail.com aka Billy Joe Clark wrote:
>> >>>>>> ...
>> >>>>>> I am 6'2" and weigh 320 lbs. I have a worksman PAV3 3CB and I
>> >>>>>> love
>> >>>>>> it. The PAV3 is heavy and well built. The spokes are 11 g[au]ge
>> >>>>>> (big
>> >>>>>> and strong)....
>> >>>>> Is the rim sufficiently strong to allow normal tension levels in
>> >>>>> these
>> >>>>> thicker than normal spokes? If not, they are worse for durability
>> >>>>> and
>> >>>>> wheel strength than thinner spokes, as they will lose their
>> >>>>> pretension
>> >>>>> at a lesser rim deflection than thinner spokes would.
>> >>>>> The thicker spoke only really helps in fatigue resistance at the
>> >>>>> elbow,
>> >>>>> which is why higher quality spokes are butted, to allow for a
>> >>>>> higher
>> >>>>> strain in the straight portion of the spoke.
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
>> >>>>> "Localized intense suction such as tornadoes is created when
>> >>>>> temperature
>> >>>>> differences are high enough between meeting air masses, and can
>> >>>>> impart
>> >>>>> excessive energy onto a cyclist." - Randy Schlitter
>> >>>> The rims are 50% thicker than normal rims. I've heard nothing but
>> >>>> good things about worksman cycles. They have been business 100
>> >>>> years. Go to worksman.com and click on PAV 3.
>> >>> How do the thicker rims compare to "normal" rims in moment of
>> >>> inertia?
>> >>> --
>> >>> Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
>> >>> "Localized intense suction such as tornadoes is created when
>> >>> temperature
>> >>> differences are high enough between meeting air masses, and can
>> >>> impart
>> >>> excessive energy onto a cyclist." - Randy Schlitter
>> >> I am not going to debate this with you. If you wish to debate this,
>> >> contact worksman.com and advise them of your expertise. They may wish
>> >> to employ you in R & D.
>>
>> > In Sherman's case, that would be "Removal & Disposal". ;-)
>>
>> Gee, I see I have a Usenet stalker - Ozark Bicycle who has never
>> displayed any interest in trikes and recumbents looks for my posts on
>> alt.rec.bicycle.recumbents, and then posts a snarky reply to
>> rec.bicycles.tech. Doesn't this man have some customers' bicycles to fix
>> in his garage?
Why are such posts in response to Tom Sherman not appearing on ARBR where
the Great Ed Dolan could deal with them - and this Ozark character too for
that matter? Those who take posts from other newsgroups and then do not see
that their messages get to the original group are cads and blackguards.
Everyone knows that the tech group is composed solely of nerds and jerks,
but that is no excuse for avoiding the Great Ed Dolan. Please note that Ed
Dolan sees to it that his messages get to the relevant cycling newsgroups,
not just ARBR.
One other thing - the above post should have been edited to get all the crap
out of it. Just because Ozark is an ignorant hillbilly does not mean that he
can neglect how his messages look. Frankly, it looks like he **** all over
himself. Clean up your messages before presenting them to the world, you
blockhead!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
news:01dbdc06-9429-4530-ae09-b49819c2139a@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Sherman could use a little self-awareness: according to Google,
> through the morning of 12/9/07 the pencil neck has outposted me on
> Usenet this month by a ratio of over 5.5-to-1. Now, who is it that has
> nothing to do?
>
>
> On Dec 9, 7:28 am, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Ozark Bicycle wrote:
>> > On Dec 8, 11:11 am, billyjoecl...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> On Dec 7, 8:40 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@yahoo.com>
>> >> wrote:
>>
>> >>> billyjoecl...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >>>> On Dec 6, 8:12 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@yahoo.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>> billyjoecl...@gmail.com aka Billy Joe Clark wrote:
>> >>>>>> ...
>> >>>>>> I am 6'2" and weigh 320 lbs. I have a worksman PAV3 3CB and I
>> >>>>>> love
>> >>>>>> it. The PAV3 is heavy and well built. The spokes are 11 g[au]ge
>> >>>>>> (big
>> >>>>>> and strong)....
>> >>>>> Is the rim sufficiently strong to allow normal tension levels in
>> >>>>> these
>> >>>>> thicker than normal spokes? If not, they are worse for durability
>> >>>>> and
>> >>>>> wheel strength than thinner spokes, as they will lose their
>> >>>>> pretension
>> >>>>> at a lesser rim deflection than thinner spokes would.
>> >>>>> The thicker spoke only really helps in fatigue resistance at the
>> >>>>> elbow,
>> >>>>> which is why higher quality spokes are butted, to allow for a
>> >>>>> higher
>> >>>>> strain in the straight portion of the spoke.
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
>> >>>>> "Localized intense suction such as tornadoes is created when
>> >>>>> temperature
>> >>>>> differences are high enough between meeting air masses, and can
>> >>>>> impart
>> >>>>> excessive energy onto a cyclist." - Randy Schlitter
>> >>>> The rims are 50% thicker than normal rims. I've heard nothing but
>> >>>> good things about worksman cycles. They have been business 100
>> >>>> years. Go to worksman.com and click on PAV 3.
>> >>> How do the thicker rims compare to "normal" rims in moment of
>> >>> inertia?
>> >>> --
>> >>> Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
>> >>> "Localized intense suction such as tornadoes is created when
>> >>> temperature
>> >>> differences are high enough between meeting air masses, and can
>> >>> impart
>> >>> excessive energy onto a cyclist." - Randy Schlitter
>> >> I am not going to debate this with you. If you wish to debate this,
>> >> contact worksman.com and advise them of your expertise. They may wish
>> >> to employ you in R & D.
>>
>> > In Sherman's case, that would be "Removal & Disposal". ;-)
>>
>> Gee, I see I have a Usenet stalker - Ozark Bicycle who has never
>> displayed any interest in trikes and recumbents looks for my posts on
>> alt.rec.bicycle.recumbents, and then posts a snarky reply to
>> rec.bicycles.tech. Doesn't this man have some customers' bicycles to fix
>> in his garage?
Why are such posts in response to Tom Sherman not appearing on ARBR where
the Great Ed Dolan could deal with them - and this Ozark character too for
that matter? Those who take posts from other newsgroups and then do not see
that their messages get to the original group are cads and blackguards.
Everyone knows that the tech group is composed solely of nerds and jerks,
but that is no excuse for avoiding the Great Ed Dolan. Please note that Ed
Dolan sees to it that his messages get to the relevant cycling newsgroups,
not just ARBR.
One other thing - the above post should have been edited to get all the crap
out of it. Just because Ozark is an ignorant hillbilly does not mean that he
can neglect how his messages look. Frankly, it looks like he **** all over
himself. Clean up your messages before presenting them to the world, you
blockhead!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota