Ron Paul Toast?

[Davey Crockett]

He isn't looking good.

His voting record is good but he just isn't coming across as a winner
to the voters

When the vote rigging came up, and a patriot was needed to join the
battle, he ran before the first shot was fired.

And that bit about the Marching, Looting and Killing holiday lost him
supporters by the tens of thousands.

There are not a lot of Republicans (Almost all of whom are WHITE) who
would not vote,in a secret ballot, to RESCIND the King Holiday. There
are damn few Republicans who would vote against a man because he said
something unflattering about the ersatz Reverend.

But it would be hard to find any Republicans who would vote for a man
because King is his hero. This is especially true in the vitally
important forthcoming South Carolina primary.

You can bet your sweet ass that the McCain people will make sure
that every White voter in South Carolina is reminded that Senator
McCain voted AGAINST the MLK holiday in the Senate.

--
Davey Crockett
-
Driving a Stake through the
Heart of the Politically Correct

[GoneBeforeMyTime]

"Davey Crockett" <rec@azurservers.com> wrote in message
news:874pdgox82.fsf@azurservers.com...
> He isn't looking good.
>
> His voting record is good but he just isn't coming across as a winner
> to the voters
>
> When the vote rigging came up, and a patriot was needed to join the
> battle, he ran before the first shot was fired.
>
> And that bit about the Marching, Looting and Killing holiday lost him
> supporters by the tens of thousands.
>
> There are not a lot of Republicans (Almost all of whom are WHITE) who
> would not vote,in a secret ballot, to RESCIND the King Holiday. There
> are damn few Republicans who would vote against a man because he said
> something unflattering about the ersatz Reverend.
>
> But it would be hard to find any Republicans who would vote for a man
> because King is his hero. This is especially true in the vitally
> important forthcoming South Carolina primary.
>
> You can bet your sweet ass that the McCain people will make sure
> that every White voter in South Carolina is reminded that Senator
> McCain voted AGAINST the MLK holiday in the Senate.
>
> --
> Davey Crockett
> -
> Driving a Stake through the
> Heart of the Politically Correct

Do you get 20/20 where you are? They has a piece on what countries are
happy, meaning basically united as a people. They make a good point, as
simple as it might be. The same point used to be called our strength. They
have always said diversity was our strength, but with so many agendas and
cultures in America, politics is chaos. In their study, Denmark was called
the happiest place on earth because 9 out of 10 people are native Danes and
they all think alike, which means the government also looks after their
interest. There is no corruption in government because they pay their
leaders extremely well, which discourages them from becoming corrupt and
accepting bribes and money from special interest. Since they already make
millions of dollars as elected leaders, they have no reason to take bribes
and actually look after following the will of the people.



Our politician don't get paid well enough so they take bribes and cater to
special interest. I think Clinton spent well beyond what he got paid just
defending himself against lawsuits, there is a big incentive for politicians
to take money from special interests like the drug companies, big oil
companies and just about everything else for sale, lock stock and barrel. If
they did that in England of Denmark, there would be a revolution by the
people. While Danes pay high taxes, they get free health care, college, and
just about everything else important as the essential basics of what should
be provided, unlike America who instead socialized the Post Office and
public schools. America just socialized the wrong things, and now special
interest have total control, so elections mean nothing, no matter who gets
elected. Independent candidates can't even get their foot in the door here,
special interest would never allow it. But America diversity has too many
people with different agendas and the politicians take advantage of that,
like Bush telling everyone to go shopping and leave the government to us.



Chaos of diversity allows them to promise all things to all people and then
do absolutely nothing. It's no wonder in a country that celebrates
corruption going all the way back to Mr. Smith goes to Washington. America
seems to thrive on political scandals like glorified soap operas. I don't
think Americans would start a revolt because they are not united, all have
different views on social and political issues, and they are probably too
lazy to march or protest because for one, they are well entertained with
cheap electronic gadgets like Ipods and HDTV with Monday night football, and
for two, they don't have time to even know the issues that well, always on
the run stuffing a big Mac in their mouths while briefly looking at a
billboard of George Bush telling everyone to go shopping, so is it any
wonder that politicians have little incentive to shape up for once and start
doing the will of the people?



Heck, they don't even know what that is, and neither do we. This kind of
chaos and complacency is a perfect breeding ground for special interest to
get their way, especially with a classic stooge like Dubya running things.
With a trillion dollar war, massive environment rollbacks and massive tax
cuts for rich, while not spending a dime on schools, parks, roads and
bridges, health care, and just about everything else that should really be
in the public interest, you would still think Americans could find some
common ground to revolt and protest, but if the good ole Gov can keep people
struggling, hopeless and helpless, with no time to even become informed
about the issues, they got us where they want us. Besides unlike France, if
we protest here, they will kill us, or really crack down hard, so maybe it's
better to watch Monday night football.



You would think America would be the most unhappy place on earth with its
patriot act, wars without end, credit card debts and the recent
castastrophic fall of housing values and real estate market, but actually
they say Italy is because of the mafia, and corruption. They say even the
French aren't that happy either, but they sure do live well there, almost as
good as the Danes if you can stomach the taxes. But if there is one thing
you should of learned by now, is that things will never change. The powers
that be with over 60 thousand special interest lobbyists working 24/7 to buy
out our politicians lock stock and barrel, is that you would be much better
to leave America, then stay here, if you can afford to do it. Then again, if
you are one of the elites in America, America is the place for you!



Maybe Davey should leave Germany for Denmark!



GBMT

[Tom Kunich]

"Davey Crockett" <rec@azurservers.com> wrote in message
news:874pdgox82.fsf@azurservers.com...
>
> There are not a lot of Republicans (Almost all of whom are WHITE)

Do you realize that the majority of people in the USA are WHITE?

[amit.ghosh@gmail.com]

On Jan 14, 8:28 pm, "GoneBeforeMyTime" <F...@EuroForums.com> wrote:
> "Davey Crockett" <r...@azurservers.com> wrote in message
>
> news:874pdgox82.fsf@azurservers.com...
>
>
>
> > He isn't looking good.
>
> > His voting record is good but he just isn't coming across as a winner
> > to the voters
>
> > When the vote rigging came up, and a patriot was needed to join the
> > battle, he ran before the first shot was fired.
>
> > And that bit about the Marching, Looting and Killing holiday lost him
> > supporters by the tens of thousands.
>
> > There are not a lot of Republicans (Almost all of whom are WHITE) who
> > would not vote,in a secret ballot, to RESCIND the King Holiday. There
> > are damn few Republicans who would vote against a man because he said
> > something unflattering about the ersatz Reverend.
>
> > But it would be hard to find any Republicans who would vote for a man
> > because King is his hero. This is especially true in the vitally
> > important forthcoming South Carolina primary.
>
> > You can bet your sweet ass that the McCain people will make sure
> > that every White voter in South Carolina is reminded that Senator
> > McCain voted AGAINST the MLK holiday in the Senate.
>
> > --
> > Davey Crockett
> > -
> > Driving a Stake through the
> > Heart of the Politically Correct
>
> Do you get 20/20 where you are? They has a piece on what countries are
> happy, meaning basically united as a people. They make a good point, as
> simple as it might be. The same point used to be called our strength. They
> have always said diversity was our strength, but with so many agendas and
> cultures in America, politics is chaos. In their study, Denmark was called
> the happiest place on earth


dumbass,

suicide rates per 100,000 :

denmark 13.6
canada 11.9
usa 11.0
india 10.7
israel 6.2
greece 2.9

[Michael Baldwin]

GBMT thinks

>Our politician don't get paid well enough so they take
>bribes and cater to special interest.


...how's this instead...Our politicians don't go to prison often and
long enough when they get caught taking bribes and catering to special
interests...I believe these behaviours border on treason...

Best Regards - Mike Baldwin

[GoneBeforeMyTime]

<amit.ghosh@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d5404e2-0673-4cfe-97d0-6ca1256aa109@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> dumbass,
>
> suicide rates per 100,000 :
>
> denmark 13.6
> canada 11.9
> usa 11.0
> india 10.7
> israel 6.2
> greece 2.9

The U.S. is the most violent society in the industrialized world, and
probably the entire world as well. The U.S. has been following the get tough
approach for decades, and we still spend more money on prisons, then we do
on schools. Does the murder rate affect the happy meter? I would think so,
but it's interesting to note teen sucide is twice as high in the US as it is
in some 26 other industialized countries. While not mentioned here, I
believe I read that somewhere recently.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage_suicide

http://nitawriter.wordpress.com/2007/05/11/suicide-rates-of-the-world/

Quoted:
Can one can safely assume that countries with the lowest suicide rates have
the greatest number of happy people?

Not really.

Of course, the dates of the suicide survey and the happiness survey differs
by a few years, the happiness index was taken in 2006, the suicide survey a
few years earlier. But I don't think this makes that much of a difference. I
think that the suicide rate has nothing to do with the general level of
happiness.

DEFINITION: This statistic is compiled from responses to the survey
question: "Taking all things together, would you say you are: very happy,
quite happy, not very happy, or not at all happy?". The "Happiness (net)"
statistic was obtained via the following formula: the percentage of people
who rated themselves as either "quite happy" or "very happy" minus the
percentage of people who rated themselves as either "not very happy" or "not
at all happy".

Group 1 countries (highest suicide rates) do have the fewest number of happy
people. Only 2 percent of Russians are happy, and no one from Belarus or
Ukraine is happy. About 10 per cent of Lithunians are happy. But countries
from Group 2, which have a fairly high suicide rate, have a high percentage
of happy people! Like Belgium (86 per cent), Finland (83), Switzerland (89),
Austria (81), France (84) and Japan (72). What does this mean? I think it
that it means that most people who commit suicide in these countries are
those who buckle under socio-cultural and relationship problems.

They are a small section of society.

It is known that more than 80 per cent of those who commit suicide are
those who suffer from mental illness, have an inability to cope. In other
words, a certain section of the population that is prone to depression and
mood disorders (always in a minority) falls prey to suicide.

About countries in Group 3 (medium suicide rate), only China and India seem
to fit. About half of the Chinese are happy and about 40 per cent of
Indians. On the other hand an overwhelming number of people from countries
such as Denmark (91 per cent), Sweden (91), Australia (90), Canada (75) and
the United States (84) are happy, belying the suicide rate. Are more people
happy in countries in Group 4, with its low suicide rates? Well, there was
no data from the Muslim countries, but the majority of those in the other
countries seem seem happy. Not a high number really - 68 percent of those in
Spain, 64 per cent of those in Italy, and 59 percent of those in Brazil and
Argentina. Obviously, these people may not consider themselves happy, but
not many are depressed enough to feel like killing themselves. The U.K,
which has a low suicide rate has a high number of happy people.

Denmark: ranked 3rd
US: ranked 13th

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/lif_hap_net-lifestyle-happiness-net

GBMT

[Donald Munro]

GoneBeforeMyTime wrote:
>> In their study, Denmark was called the happiest place on earth

amit.ghosh@gmail.com wrote:
> suicide rates per 100,000 :
> denmark 13.6
> canada 11.9
> usa 11.0
> india 10.7
> israel 6.2
> greece 2.9

Not all that many school shootings though.

[ilanpsi@gmail.com]

On Jan 15, 2:59 am, "amit.gh...@gmail.com" <amit.gh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> dumbass,
>
> suicide rates per 100,000 :

> israel 6.2

Does that include suicide bombers?

-ilan

[Pholkie]

amit.ghosh@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jan 14, 8:28 pm, "GoneBeforeMyTime" <F...@EuroForums.com> wrote:
>> Do you get 20/20 where you are? They has a piece on what countries are
>> happy, meaning basically united as a people. They make a good point, as
>> simple as it might be. The same point used to be called our strength. They
>> have always said diversity was our strength, but with so many agendas and
>> cultures in America, politics is chaos. In their study, Denmark was called
>> the happiest place on earth
>
>
> dumbass,
>
> suicide rates per 100,000 :
>
> denmark 13.6
> canada 11.9
> usa 11.0
> india 10.7
> israel 6.2
> greece 2.9

dumbass,

that means that Denmark is the happiest place on earth because the
unhappy people are killing themselves off. If more unhappy Americans
would get off their fat unhappy asses and kill themselves off, then the
USA would be a much happier place.

[Andre]

On Jan 14, 10:06*pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "Davey Crockett" <r...@azurservers.com> wrote in message
>
> news:874pdgox82.fsf@azurservers.com...
>
>
>
> > There are not a lot of Republicans (Almost all of whom are WHITE)
>
> Do you realize that the majority of people in the USA are WHITE?

Are rednecks considered white?

Andre

[Tom Kunich]

"GoneBeforeMyTime" <Fans@EuroForums.com> wrote in message
news:kradnQL1fZtBuhHanZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@sti.net...
>
> <amit.ghosh@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3d5404e2-0673-4cfe-97d0-6ca1256aa109@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> dumbass,
>>
>> suicide rates per 100,000 :
>>
>> denmark 13.6
>> canada 11.9
>> usa 11.0
>> india 10.7
>> israel 6.2
>> greece 2.9
>
> The U.S. is the most violent society in the industrialized world, and
> probably the entire world as well. The U.S. has been following the get
> tough approach for decades, and we still spend more money on prisons, then
> we do on schools. Does the murder rate affect the happy meter? I would
> think so, but it's interesting to note teen sucide is twice as high in the
> US as it is in some 26 other industialized countries. While not mentioned
> here, I believe I read that somewhere recently.

What other countries have a press that are constantly printing headlines
such as "Black youths unfairly targeted in crime operations"?

The fact is that the free press in the USA has NEVER shown a shred of
responsibility.

[Pete]

Tom Kunich wrote:
> "GoneBeforeMyTime" <Fans@EuroForums.com> wrote in message
> news:kradnQL1fZtBuhHanZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@sti.net...
>>
>> <amit.ghosh@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:3d5404e2-0673-4cfe-97d0-6ca1256aa109@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>> dumbass,
>>>
>>> suicide rates per 100,000 :
>>>
>>> denmark 13.6
>>> canada 11.9
>>> usa 11.0
>>> india 10.7
>>> israel 6.2
>>> greece 2.9
>>
>> The U.S. is the most violent society in the industrialized world, and
>> probably the entire world as well. The U.S. has been following the
>> get tough approach for decades, and we still spend more money on
>> prisons, then we do on schools. Does the murder rate affect the
>> happy meter? I would think so, but it's interesting to note teen
>> sucide is twice as high in the US as it is in some 26 other
>> industialized countries. While not mentioned here, I believe I read
>> that somewhere recently.
>
> What other countries have a press that are constantly printing
> headlines such as "Black youths unfairly targeted in crime
> operations"?

Quite a lot, actually. Several times in the last few months here in
the UK for starters. Most recently along with a much smaller story a
couple of pages in with a black community leader explaining that he
thinks it's entirely reasonable for the police to target high crime
demographics.

> The fact is that the free press in the USA has NEVER shown a shred of
> responsibility.

You really expect it to? Newspapers make money, lots of money, and
they do it by printing whatever will get readers, not whatever might
be good for society. Every country that has a genuine free press has
lots of examples of media stirring up trouble.

Good example from the UK: a few years ago the News of the World got
its hands on a list of people convicted of paedophilia who'd served
their time and gone back into the community. So they printed big
'paedos near your kids' headlines, followed by a list of names and
addresses. Well - the genuine paedos probably deserved what they got.
Except they made one or two mistakes looking up the addresses of some
people, and published the wrong John Smith's details. Public apologies
don't go very far with replacing cars and windows (and then some of
the retarded end of the readership decided that 'paediatrician' and
'paedophile' sound similar and went after a doctor as well).

Pete

[Carl Sundquist]

"Pete" <petersr1088@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7bdd69b3-f963-4062-8ff5-ae922026fd49@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> You really expect it to? Newspapers make money, lots of money, and
> they do it by printing whatever will get readers, not whatever might
> be good for society. Every country that has a genuine free press has
> lots of examples of media stirring up trouble.
>

Actually, newspapers are _not_ making a lot of money. They are cutting
staff, depending more and more on wire services and press releases and less
on individual reporters. They are cutting back on fulltime correspondents in
places like Wash DC and international cities. Circulation is down almost
across the board. You can see the desperation for revenue dollars by ads on
front pages, fold outs, and where columns have been hacked up to place
contour ads.

Historically, news media has performed a service of examining topics and
occasionally questioning accuracy and accountability. Is that what you mean
by "stirring up trouble"?

[Fred Fredburger]

Donald Munro wrote:
> GoneBeforeMyTime wrote:
>>> In their study, Denmark was called the happiest place on earth
>
> amit.ghosh@gmail.com wrote:
>> suicide rates per 100,000 :
>> denmark 13.6
>> canada 11.9
>> usa 11.0
>> india 10.7
>> israel 6.2
>> greece 2.9
>
> Not all that many school shootings though.
>

Well, there would be more of those except that murder is so rampant in
the U.S. that the gunmen are generally shot before they get a chance to
perpetrate their crimes. It affects the suicide statistics too: why even
bother to commit suicide when someone will kill you if you just hold on
for 30 seconds? Thank goodness the government issued all us rich people
bullet-proof, flame-proof, Al-Qaida-proof suits a few years back. Thank
goodness also that there's a combination safe-house dry-cleaner opening
down the street real soon now. I'm looking forward to that.

[Bill C]

On Jan 15, 12:55*pm, "Carl Sundquist" <carl...@cox.net> wrote:

>
> Actually, newspapers are _not_ making a lot of money. They are cutting
> staff, depending more and more on wire services and press releases and less
> on individual reporters. They are cutting back on fulltime correspondents in
> places like Wash DC and international cities. Circulation is down almost
> across the board. You can see the desperation for revenue dollars by ads on
> front pages, fold outs, and where columns have been hacked up to place
> contour ads.
>
> Historically, news media has performed a service of examining topics and
> occasionally questioning accuracy and accountability. Is that what you mean
> by "stirring up trouble"?

What I like about newspapers, and their internet sites is the depth
and detail they are able to bring to a subject. The idiot box and
talking heads are useless, or pretty damned close, for anything but a
headline service that lets you know if you want to go get more of the
story.
Bill C

[Pete]

On 15 Jan, 17:55, "Carl Sundquist" <carl...@cox.net> wrote:
> "Pete" <petersr1...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7bdd69b3-f963-4062-8ff5-ae922026fd49@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > You really expect it to? Newspapers make money, lots of money, and
> > they do it by printing whatever will get readers, not whatever might
> > be good for society. Every country that has a genuine free press has
> > lots of examples of media stirring up trouble.
>
> Actually, newspapers are _not_ making a lot of money. They are cutting
> staff, depending more and more on wire services and press releases and less
> on individual reporters. They are cutting back on fulltime correspondents in
> places like Wash DC and international cities. Circulation is down almost
> across the board. You can see the desperation for revenue dollars by ads on
> front pages, fold outs, and where columns have been hacked up to place
> contour ads.

It's still good money if you happen to own a newspaper; doesn't bother
Murdoch too much that he has to sacrifice quality as you describe to
keep profitable.

> Historically, news media has performed a service of examining topics and
> occasionally questioning accuracy and accountability. Is that what you mean
> by "stirring up trouble"?

You get both, of course. I'm certainly not trying to suggest
newspapers do nothing but stir up trouble, and I don't imagine you'd
suggest they never do it (or at least, not unless you think I'm lying
about the News of the World and paedophiles). Some newspapers sell
mainly to reasonably intelligent people, and they tend to do more of
the detailed analysis, whistle-blowing, this kind of thing that you're
talking about (because that's what their readers want - the Times is a
Murdoch paper, and that's respected and intelligent, the News of the
World is also a Murdoch paper, and that is neither). Others sell to
less intelligent people with soft porn on page 3, and they tend to go
in for the sensational stories, and sometimes those do stir up
trouble.

Pete

[Tom Kunich]

"Carl Sundquist" <carlsun@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Is6jj.3571$HL1.1981@newsfe21.lga...
>
> Actually, newspapers are _not_ making a lot of money. They are cutting
> staff, depending more and more on wire services and press releases and
> less on individual reporters. They are cutting back on fulltime
> correspondents in places like Wash DC and international cities.
> Circulation is down almost across the board. You can see the desperation
> for revenue dollars by ads on front pages, fold outs, and where columns
> have been hacked up to place contour ads.

Responsible people are growing tired of the leftist leaning of most of the
major newspapers in the USA these days and are staying away in droves. Of
course the news media is presenting that as people being too stupid to read
and that sort of thing. Anything to avoid blaming themselves for their own
growing predicument.

> Historically, news media has performed a service of examining topics and
> occasionally questioning accuracy and accountability. Is that what you
> mean by "stirring up trouble"?

When you purposely report the most sordid take on everything that is
stirring up trouble. For instance, most "racism" these days is more
ignorance and misinterpretation than racism yet is front page news
everywhere. I have no problem with a newspaper story that presents all sides
including some that are unpopular. The problem is that they are stirring
controversy to increase their income and since a large part of the major
news media is now under the control of extreme Liberals, they are also
attempting to cause change contrary to the will of the vast majority of the
USA. As proof of that something like 85% of all reporters claim to be
Liberals and when questioned the majority of those demonstrated that they
were extremists as well. Same with school teachers who have been trying to
convince their students for 4 decades that socialism is a good thing since
they live under what is essentially a socialistically run system and believe
it to be great.

[GoneBeforeMyTime]

"Carl Sundquist" <carlsun@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Is6jj.3571$HL1.1981@newsfe21.lga...
>
> "Pete" <petersr1088@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7bdd69b3-f963-4062-8ff5-ae922026fd49@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> You really expect it to? Newspapers make money, lots of money, and
>> they do it by printing whatever will get readers, not whatever might
>> be good for society. Every country that has a genuine free press has
>> lots of examples of media stirring up trouble.
>>
>
> Actually, newspapers are _not_ making a lot of money. They are cutting
> staff, depending more and more on wire services and press releases and
> less on individual reporters. They are cutting back on fulltime
> correspondents in places like Wash DC and international cities.
> Circulation is down almost across the board. You can see the desperation
> for revenue dollars by ads on front pages, fold outs, and where columns
> have been hacked up to place contour ads.

Eons ago, I used to enjoy Newsweek, we subscribed for years, but at some
point, can remember the exact year, they changed to some kinky writing style
that was so convoluted that I just couldn't make much sense out what was
being written. I don't know if it was just one jaded writer they hired, or a
major shift in reporting, editing and writing, but whatever it was, I bailed
from reading that crap. Just a bunch of mumbo jumbo. Used to be Newsweek was
a good read, not sure what it's like today, haven't read it in years. I read
Time magazine too, but not enough to remember, we didn't have a
subscription, just bought random copies. I remember Look too, my parents got
that, but Life was better for photos. I think Look was a clone. We always
enjoyed Readers Digest as kids, the folks used to get that alone with Life,
Look, Readers Digest, Newsweek and the TV Guide. Ah, TV Guide was kind of
worthless!



GBMT

[ilanpsi@gmail.com]

On Jan 15, 9:20 pm, ilan...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2:59 am, "amit.gh...@gmail.com" <amit.gh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > dumbass,
>
> > suicide rates per 100,000 :
> > israel 6.2
>
> Does that include suicide bombers?
>
> -ilan

Which reminds me, Hamas is now decorating suicide bombers who carry
out 10 successful missions.

-ilan

[Tom Kunich]

<ilanpsi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fa00e14a-11f8-4508-9071-d9954c387ea0@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> Which reminds me, Hamas is now decorating suicide bombers who carry
> out 10 successful missions.

Sounds like they've been educated in American schools.

[ST]

On 1/15/08 12:27 PM, in article
fa00e14a-11f8-4508-9071-d9954c387ea0@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com,
"ilanpsi@gmail.com" <ilanpsi@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 15, 9:20 pm, ilan...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Jan 15, 2:59 am, "amit.gh...@gmail.com" <amit.gh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> dumbass,
>>
>>> suicide rates per 100,000 :
>>> israel 6.2
>>
>> Does that include suicide bombers?
>>
>> -ilan
>
> Which reminds me, Hamas is now decorating suicide bombers who carry
> out 10 successful missions.
>
> -ilan


Yuk yuk.......

[Davey Crockett]

Andre a écrit profondement:


| Are rednecks considered white?

Only if their bath is on the porch, their pickup engine is on the
kitchen table, they're cooking up a batch of White Lightning in
the bathroom, have poster size picture of Bobby Lee on the wall and
the Confederate Anthem is No.One on their hit parade

http://azurservers.com/rec/confederate-anthem.mp3


--
Davey Crockett
-
Driving a Stake through the
Heart of the Politically Correct

[Michael Press]

In article
<fd966083-e057-45fa-88c4-42963144b158@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Andre <ANDREJANSSENS1@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Jan 14, 10:06*pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> > "Davey Crockett" <r...@azurservers.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:874pdgox82.fsf@azurservers.com...
> >
> >
> >
> > > There are not a lot of Republicans (Almost all of whom are WHITE)
> >
> > Do you realize that the majority of people in the USA are WHITE?
>
> Are rednecks considered white?

Mostly Scots, therefore, yes.
The history is fascinating.
Hundreds of years of border skirmishes between
England and Scotland. England finally got the upper
hand and shipped many of them to the six counties
and to the colonies.

Steel Bonnets: The Story of the Anglo-Scottish Border Reivers
by George MacDonald Fraser

<http://www.amazon.com/Steel-Bonnets-Anglo-Scottish-Border-Reivers/dp/0002727463>

--
Michael Press

[Howard Kveck]

In article <13oqb3pp9eto7cb@corp.supernews.com>, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com>
wrote:

> "Carl Sundquist" <carlsun@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Is6jj.3571$HL1.1981@newsfe21.lga...
> >
> > Actually, newspapers are _not_ making a lot of money. They are cutting
> > staff, depending more and more on wire services and press releases and
> > less on individual reporters. They are cutting back on fulltime
> > correspondents in places like Wash DC and international cities.
> > Circulation is down almost across the board. You can see the desperation
> > for revenue dollars by ads on front pages, fold outs, and where columns
> > have been hacked up to place contour ads.
>
> Responsible people are growing tired of the leftist leaning of most of the
> major newspapers in the USA these days and are staying away in droves.

Wrong. Older people, who are generally more conservative than younger people, are
almost all who read newspapers, as younger people have migrated to other means of
getting information, such the internets. As their readerships have gotten older,
newspapers have tried to cater to that readership, knowing that they've likely lost
forever the younger readers. Therefore, newspapers are, in general, much more
conservative than they used to be.

--
tanx,
Howard

Now it's raining pitchforks and women,
But I've already got a pitchfork...

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

[Donald Munro]

Michael Press wrote:
> Mostly Scots, therefore, yes.

Excuse me, none of my ancestors dated their sister. At least
I hope not. Unless of course that is the reason why my sprinting
genetics suck.

[Ryan Cousineau]

In article <TqKdnU0BlsKyGBDanZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@sti.net>,
"GoneBeforeMyTime" <Fans@EuroForums.com> wrote:

> "Carl Sundquist" <carlsun@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Is6jj.3571$HL1.1981@newsfe21.lga...
> >
> > "Pete" <petersr1088@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:7bdd69b3-f963-4062-8ff5-ae922026fd49@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> >>
> >> You really expect it to? Newspapers make money, lots of money, and
> >> they do it by printing whatever will get readers, not whatever might
> >> be good for society. Every country that has a genuine free press has
> >> lots of examples of media stirring up trouble.
> >>
> >
> > Actually, newspapers are _not_ making a lot of money. They are cutting
> > staff, depending more and more on wire services and press releases and
> > less on individual reporters. They are cutting back on fulltime
> > correspondents in places like Wash DC and international cities.
> > Circulation is down almost across the board. You can see the desperation
> > for revenue dollars by ads on front pages, fold outs, and where columns
> > have been hacked up to place contour ads.
>
> Eons ago, I used to enjoy Newsweek, we subscribed for years, but at some
> point, can remember the exact year, they changed to some kinky writing style
> that was so convoluted that I just couldn't make much sense out what was
> being written. I don't know if it was just one jaded writer they hired, or a
> major shift in reporting, editing and writing, but whatever it was, I bailed
> from reading that crap. Just a bunch of mumbo jumbo. Used to be Newsweek was
> a good read, not sure what it's like today, haven't read it in years. I read
> Time magazine too, but not enough to remember, we didn't have a
> subscription, just bought random copies. I remember Look too, my parents got
> that, but Life was better for photos. I think Look was a clone. We always
> enjoyed Readers Digest as kids, the folks used to get that alone with Life,
> Look, Readers Digest, Newsweek and the TV Guide. Ah, TV Guide was kind of
> worthless!

GMBT: Newsweek didn't change, you just went senile.

--
Ryan Cousineau rcousine@sfu.ca http://www.wiredcola.com/
"My scenarios may give the impression I could be an excellent crook.
Not true - I am a talented lawyer." - Sandy in rec.bicycles.racing

[ST]

³A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only
exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the
Public Treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the
candidate promising the most benefits from the Public Treasury with the
result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy always
followed by dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest
civilizations has been two-hundred years. These nations have progressed
throught this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual
faith to great courage; from courage to abundance; from abundance to
complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependence; from
dependence back again into bondage.²


‹Alexander Fraser Tyler, 1700 Quotation found in SYNERGY Server [Note: The
Professor wrote about the fall of the Athenian republic over a thousand
years ago this when America was a British colony.]

[Donald Munro]

Pholkie wrote:
> that means that Denmark is the happiest place on earth because the unhappy
> people are killing themselves off. If more unhappy Americans would get
> off their fat unhappy asses and kill themselves off, then the USA would be
> a much happier place.

Perhaps they just kill themselves slowly with food and sloth.

[ST]

On 1/16/08 7:12 AM, in article
6aydnYAQSYqfghPanZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@speakeasy.net, "Pholkie"
<pholkie@hotmail.com> wrote:

> amit.ghosh@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Jan 14, 8:28 pm, "GoneBeforeMyTime" <F...@EuroForums.com> wrote:
>>> Do you get 20/20 where you are? They has a piece on what countries are
>>> happy, meaning basically united as a people. They make a good point, as
>>> simple as it might be. The same point used to be called our strength. They
>>> have always said diversity was our strength, but with so many agendas and
>>> cultures in America, politics is chaos. In their study, Denmark was called
>>> the happiest place on earth
>>
>>
>> dumbass,
>>
>> suicide rates per 100,000 :
>>
>> denmark 13.6
>> canada 11.9
>> usa 11.0
>> india 10.7
>> israel 6.2
>> greece 2.9
>
> dumbass,
>
> that means that Denmark is the happiest place on earth because the
> unhappy people are killing themselves off. If more unhappy Americans
> would get off their fat unhappy asses and kill themselves off, then the
> USA would be a much happier place.


What!! Not Denmark! That bastion of open drug use and sexual freedom!
Isn't Denmark what San Francisco is trying to achieve with their socialist
community???