PDA

View Full Version : ARBR - RIP


Edward Dolan
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
Only the Great Ed Doan and his weasel of a stalker Jim McNamara have been on
ARBR for the past week with a chirp or two from the peanut gallery, i.e.,
Tom Sherman. This newsgroup is now dead as a door nail. Why doesn't someone
with a knowledge of how Usenet works please just bury us. It is unseemly to
be above ground when you are dead.

Has there ever been a newsgroup in the entire history of Usenet more
worthless and useless than ARBR? Although all of Usenet is worthless and
useless, ARBR is exceptionally worthless and useless. It was destroyed long
ago by a criminal vandal troll by the name of Ed Gin. The Tom Shermans of
this world are too cowardly to ever oppose criminals. Thus ARBR, lacking a
moderator, perished for want of one.

ARBR - RIP!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
"Mike Fox" <mikefox@Junoo.com> wrote in message
news:3b68r39ss8id9m4nmdjb0in05omvb5s3ce@4ax.com...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS NOR DOES HE EVEN POST ANY OF THE MESSAGE TO WHICH
HE IS RESPONDING. WHAT AN IDIOT!

Here is the original message.

Only the Great Ed Dolan and his weasel of a stalker Jim McNamara have been
on
ARBR for the past week with a chirp or two from the peanut gallery, i.e.,
Tom Sherman. This newsgroup is now dead as a door nail. Why doesn't someone
with a knowledge of how Usenet works please just bury us. It is unseemly to
be above ground when you are dead.

Has there ever been a newsgroup in the entire history of Usenet more
worthless and useless than ARBR? Although all of Usenet is worthless and
useless, ARBR is exceptionally worthless and useless. It was destroyed long
ago by a criminal vandal troll by the name of Ed Gin. The Tom Shermans of
this world are too cowardly to ever oppose criminals. Thus ARBR, lacking a
moderator, perished for want of one.

ARBR - RIP!

> And you're the one who destroyed it.

ARBR was destroyed some years ago by the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin. Jim
McNamara aided and abetted this criminal by bringing his personal feud with
the scum bag to ARBR in the first place. Finally, Tom Sherman, formerly a
stalwart of this newsgroup, stood by and let it happen. The only hero in
this entire scenario was yours truly, Ed Dolan the Great. But one man, no
matter how Great, cannot save a newsgroup when it is composed solely of
idiots and cowards.

ARBR is now a worthless and useless newsgroup thanks to the cowardice of
recumbent cyclists who have no heart for combating criminals. All we get now
are inane messages from the likes of Harry Brogan of Lincoln, Nebraska about
toothpaste. That right there ought to tell you where we are at. Nowhere!

At one time we had many foreign contributors to ARBR, some even from places
like Denmark and Germany. Of course, they were all idiots too, but at least
they were interesting idiots - unlike our domestic variety made in the USA.
I think at one time we even had a college professor honoring us with his
intelligence. Alas, there is naught but any left here now except for the
dregs of society. Even the redoubtable Tom Sherman has gone slumming and
seldom posts anything intelligent anymore.

Let's face it, there is no one left on ARBR except for scalawags and
scoundrels, knaves and blackguards, fools and charlatans. Anyone with any
brains and moral character has long since left ARBR. Only Ed Dolan the Great
remains to sweep up the deposits of manure from such as Mike Fox.

ARBR - RIP!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
"Papa Tom" <TomMontalbano@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:47b6095e$0$25028$607ed4bc@cv.net...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!

> I, too, am disappointed that SEVERAL of the Usenet groups I used to be so
> excited to read every day have been destroyed by these jackasses.
>
> I run a non-bicycle-related discussion group over at Google Groups and
> I've made it a moderated group solely to avoid trolls, spammers, etc. It
> works really great for the members, although I spend A LOT of time
> filtering out bad posts and banning the people who sent them.
>
> Perhaps it's time to move this group over to Google and take advantage of
> some of the filters that can squash this kind of crap before anybody has
> to read it.

Good idea Papa Tom! However, the Google filters do no good at all as any
number of former members of ARBR have discovered to their sorrow. Only a
moderated group will work. But by all means get these confounded idiots off
of ARBR and unto your nanny group where you can censor what you don't like.
Hells Bells, I would be this world's greatest expert at doing that myself.
In fact, I am your ultimate censor. Believe you me, NOTHING would get by me.
I would only post my own words and the rest of the world be damned.

The main problem with a moderated newsgroup is the extreme boredom that sets
in after about 1 minute. But most folks don't mind being bored. After all,
they bore everyone they come into contact with themselves. Yea, that is
their natural condition - to bore and to be bored.

Does not a user name like Papa Tom tell you everything you will ever have to
know about him? Obviously, he is not Great like I am.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
<rickey_rules-again@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8d2cf8d8-86af-4525-8661-5d20f8c757c8@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

[Quotation hierarchy is missing. I have supplied my own marks.]

On Feb 15, 12:10 am, Simon Brooke <si...@jasmine.org.uk> wrote:
> Edward Dolan wrote:
> > Only the Great Ed Doan and his weasel of a stalker Jim McNamara have
> > been
> > on ARBR for the past week with a chirp or two from the peanut gallery,
> > i.e., Tom Sherman. This newsgroup is now dead as a door nail.
>
> As a general rule I don't respond to trolls, but this is hypocrisy gone
> too
> far. Yes, you - you personally, none other - have destroyed a Usenet
> resource that was useful to other people. And you have done so in the
> comfortable knowledge that none of the people who have been harmed by your
> actions are near enough to you to smack you in the face as you deserve. I
> hope you feel proud.
>
> --
> si...@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke)http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
>
> ;; Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they
> ;; do it from religious conviction." - Pascal

The UseNet is a unmoderated group list. It assumes that all
participants will stay on subject. In the case of ARBR, it is a
discussion of recumbents, not politics, religion, or alternative life
styles. Unlike the bumper of your car or the privacy of your home ,
it's not a place to express your opinions except those concerning
recumbents. I understand that recumbents were once coveted by the
counter-culture and for old time sake it may be cool to throw in a
comment about your misadventures of civil disobedience during a recent
Critical Mass, but your comments and opinions will be weighed.

>>> To stay strictly on the subject of recumbents is a monumental bore.
>>> Anyone with a brain in his head cannot do it. You would have to be as
>>> dumb as an ox. I like to let the conversation wander wherever it will.
>>> All that really matters is that interesting things get said. Bother the
>>> subject!

As for Simon's claim of hypocrisy gone too far; his sig is complete
hypocrisy:
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it
from religious conviction." - Pascal
Simon's attempt to marginalize religion is offensive to me. After all,
the most evil men in the 20th century included Hitler, Stalin, Po Pot
(Soloth Sar), Lenin. They were all atheist and socialist, yet they all
murdered millions with cheer.

>>> YES! All socialists! Every last one of them. And all atheists too. God
>>> Damn these assholes who think a humanist secularism is the salvation of
>>> mankind. I am an atheist myself, but I have sense enough to shut up
>>> about it.

Simon- You preach, yet you are a moral degenerate! Why don't you be
good Englishman and at least change your offending sig?

>>> I am of Irish ancestry and simply can't stand the English. There is
>>> something wrong with the way their brains work.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Simon Brooke
01-04-1970, 02:53 AM
Edward Dolan wrote:

> Only the Great Ed Doan and his weasel of a stalker Jim McNamara have been
> on ARBR for the past week with a chirp or two from the peanut gallery,
> i.e., Tom Sherman. This newsgroup is now dead as a door nail.

As a general rule I don't respond to trolls, but this is hypocrisy gone too
far. Yes, you - you personally, none other - have destroyed a Usenet
resource that was useful to other people. And you have done so in the
comfortable knowledge that none of the people who have been harmed by your
actions are near enough to you to smack you in the face as you deserve. I
hope you feel proud.

--
simon@jasmine.org.uk (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

;; Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they
;; do it from religious conviction." - Pascal

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 02:59 AM
On Feb 14, 5:20 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "Mike Fox" <mike...@Junoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3b68r39ss8id9m4nmdjb0in05omvb5s3ce@4ax.com...
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS NOR DOES HE EVEN POST ANY OF THE MESSAGE TO WHICH
> HE IS RESPONDING. WHAT AN IDIOT!
>
> Here is the original message.
>
> Only the Great Ed Dolan and his weasel of a stalker Jim McNamara have been
> on
> ARBR for the past week with a chirp or two from the peanut gallery, i.e.,
> Tom Sherman. This newsgroup is now dead as a door nail. Why doesn't someone
> with a knowledge of how Usenet works please just bury us. It is unseemly to
> be above ground when you are dead.
>
> Has there ever been a newsgroup in the entire history of Usenet more
> worthless and useless than ARBR? Although all of Usenet is worthless and
> useless, ARBR is exceptionally worthless and useless. It was destroyed long
> ago by a criminal vandal troll by the name of Ed Gin. The Tom Shermans of
> this world are too cowardly to ever oppose criminals. Thus ARBR, lacking a
> moderator, perished for want of one.
>
> ARBR - RIP!
>
> > And you're the one who destroyed it.
>
> ARBR was destroyed some years ago by the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin. Jim
> McNamara aided and abetted this criminal by bringing his personal feud with
> the scum bag to ARBR in the first place.

If you are going to lie, use some imagination and make it
believable. Don't insult our intelligence by pissing over our
shoulders and try to convince us it's raining. Until proof is
provided, the readership can safely assume that this is just another
example of one of Ed Dolan's unsubstantiated allegations. And
uncorroborated assertion does not a fact make and that's a fact.

Finally, Tom Sherman, formerly a
> stalwart of this newsgroup, stood by and let it happen. The only hero in
> this entire scenario was yours truly, Ed Dolan the Great. But one man, no
> matter how Great, cannot save a newsgroup when it is composed solely of
> idiots and cowards.
>
> ARBR is now a worthless and useless newsgroup thanks to the cowardice of
> recumbent cyclists who have no heart for combating criminals. All we get now
> are inane messages from the likes of Harry Brogan of Lincoln, Nebraska about
> toothpaste. That right there ought to tell you where we are at. Nowhere!
>
> At one time we had many foreign contributors to ARBR, some even from places
> like Denmark and Germany. Of course, they were all idiots too, but at least
> they were interesting idiots - unlike our domestic variety made in the USA.
> I think at one time we even had a college professor honoring us with his
> intelligence. Alas, there is naught but any left here now except for the
> dregs of society. Even the redoubtable Tom Sherman has gone slumming and
> seldom posts anything intelligent anymore.
>
> Let's face it, there is no one left on ARBR except for scalawags and
> scoundrels, knaves and blackguards, fools and charlatans. Anyone with any
> brains and moral character has long since left ARBR. Only Ed Dolan the Great
> remains to sweep up the deposits of manure from such as Mike Fox.
>
> ARBR - RIP!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:03 AM
"Simon Brooke" <simon@jasmine.org.uk> wrote in message
news:61kvv5F1vp9orU1@mid.individual.net...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>
>> Only the Great Ed Dolan and his weasel of a stalker Jim McNamara have
>> been
>> on ARBR for the past week with a chirp or two from the peanut gallery,
>> i.e., Tom Sherman. This newsgroup is now dead as a door nail. ...
>
> As a general rule I don't respond to trolls, but this is hypocrisy gone
> too
> far. Yes, you - you personally, none other - have destroyed a Usenet
> resource that was useful to other people. And you have done so in the
> comfortable knowledge that none of the people who have been harmed by your
> actions are near enough to you to smack you in the face as you deserve. I
> hope you feel proud.

Simon Brooke knows not the history of ARBR. If he did, he would not say such
ignorant things and make such a jackass of himself.

But Simon Brooke has been what was wrong with ARBR from the get-go. He is a
troglodyte of an English man who only wants to smack those whom he can't
fend off with words. ARBR used to be full of his type but Ed Dolan the Great
has gotten rid of them to the eternal gratitude of all Usenet participants.

It is far, far better that ARBR perish than that it be a stomping ground for
troglodytes like Simon Brooke. Do not the English have their own recumbent
cycling newsgroup? He needs to be among his own kind where they are used to
smacking one another. A more silly bunch of cycling folks do not exist in
this world than the freaking English. They need to stay in their small
kingdom by the sea and not bother the bigger world.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:11 AM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b850e562-2451-4fd9-9d78-bdf2dcd73307@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 14, 5:20 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
[...]
>> ARBR was destroyed some years ago by the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin.
>> Jim
>> McNamara aided and abetted this criminal by bringing his personal feud
>> with
>> the scum bag to ARBR in the first place.
>
> If you are going to lie, use some imagination and make it
> believable. Don't insult our intelligence by pissing over our
> shoulders and try to convince us it's raining. Until proof is
> provided, the readership can safely assume that this is just another
> example of one of Ed Dolan's unsubstantiated allegations. And
> uncorroborated assertion does not a fact make and that's a fact.

All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed Gin in the
Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
[...]

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Jym Dyer
01-04-1970, 03:11 AM
=x= I have Ed Dolan killfiled, but every now and then he pops
up when I switch newsreader configurations around. Here he
is, singing the same old same old same old out-of-tune tune:

> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed
> Gin in the Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.

=x= The number of people care diminishes with your every
massively-crossposted rotten missive. Several years ago is
one thing; here and now, the problem is an entirely different
Ed who is like a plague of boils on the tuckus of Usenet.
<_Jym_>

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:11 AM
On Feb 16, 5:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:b850e562-2451-4fd9-9d78-bdf2dcd73307@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Feb 14, 5:20 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
> >> ARBR was destroyed some years ago by the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin.
> >> Jim
> >> McNamara aided and abetted this criminal by bringing his personal feud
> >> with
> >> the scum bag to ARBR in the first place.
>
> > If you are going to lie, use some imagination and make it
> > believable. Don't insult our intelligence by pissing over our
> > shoulders and try to convince us it's raining. Until proof is
> > provided, the readership can safely assume that this is just another
> > example of one of Ed Dolan's unsubstantiated allegations. And
> > uncorroborated assertion does not a fact make and that's a fact.
>
> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed Gin in the
> Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
> [...]

I never denied that I had a ongoing feud with the man, but I deny that
I brought the feud to ARBR and until you can offer proof of your
statement that I did, I contend that you are a liar, plain and
simple. In fact through cross posting Ed spread our feud across
several newsgroups and even ported it over to a moderated forum where
he was suspended from posting, but I repeat I have put the man behind
me and move on and you cannot. You accuse me of covering the same old
ground and not moving on and I have repeatedly requested you to
refrain from covering the same old ground and requested you to move
on. I am able to do so, You are not and therein lies the difference
between us. The only time I mention Ed Gin is to request you to stop
talking about the man, but you cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara

>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Tom Sherman
01-04-1970, 03:12 AM
Jym Dyer wrote:
> =x= I have Ed Dolan killfiled, but every now and then he pops
> up when I switch newsreader configurations around. Here he
> is, singing the same old same old same old out-of-tune tune:
>
>> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed
>> Gin in the Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
>
> =x= The number of people care diminishes with your every
> massively-crossposted rotten missive. Several years ago is
> one thing; here and now, the problem is an entirely different
> Ed who is like a plague of boils on the tuckus of Usenet.
>
I am sure that whale poop is a valuable nutrition source for some plants
and animals. What comparable service does Ed Dolan offer?

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:12 AM
"Jym Dyer" <jym@econet.org> wrote in message
news:Jym.16Feb2008.47b7806f@econet.org...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!

> =x= I have Ed Dolan killfiled, but every now and then he pops
> up when I switch newsreader configurations around. Here he
> is, singing the same old same old same old out-of-tune tune:
>
>> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed
>> Gin in the Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
>
> =x= The number of people care diminishes with your every
> massively-crossposted rotten missive. Several years ago is
> one thing; here and now, the problem is an entirely different
> Ed who is like a plague of boils on the tuckus [?] of Usenet.
> <_Jym_>

The problem is more Jim McNamara than yours truly. He is a weasel of a
stalker who is determined to have the last word on whatever subject is under
review. That will never happen with me because I am Great and he isn't.

I only cross post to the other cycling newsgroups when I feel I am being
particularly brilliant and/or that it is something they need to hear in
order to prevent them from going the way of ARBR. Yes, I know, I am just too
good for this world, but it is part of My Saintliness!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:12 AM
"Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fp849b$mk1$2@registered.motzarella.org...
> Jym Dyer wrote:
>> =x= I have Ed Dolan killfiled, but every now and then he pops
>> up when I switch newsreader configurations around. Here he
>> is, singing the same old same old same old out-of-tune tune:
>>
>>> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed
>>> Gin in the Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
>>
>> =x= The number of people care diminishes with your every
>> massively-crossposted rotten missive. Several years ago is
>> one thing; here and now, the problem is an entirely different
>> Ed who is like a plague of boils on the tuckus of Usenet.
>>
> I am sure that whale poop is a valuable nutrition source for some plants
> and animals. What comparable service does Ed Dolan offer?

This is what passes for Tom Sherman wit. Anyone laughing? I thought not.

Tom Sherman thinks he performs some services for these
freaking-cycling-newgroups (all one word) by pontificating on trivia and
occasionally advising some ignorant newbie on his bike problem. But all he
is doing is huffing and puffing like the viper that he is. There is nothing
Tom Sherman can contribute that is not already known in spades by anyone who
has been around for a awhile. He has pretty much come to this conclusion
himself as witness his most recent messages. He is a slow learner as are all
scientific-engineering types.

Tom Sherman's contributions these days are to attempt lame humor which no
one ever responds to because they do not even know what he is referencing
half the time. He has been reduced to a poor jokester. Between the two of
us, we are going to kill ARBR - and it will be good riddance to the most
miserable newsgroup that has ever existed on Usenet.

ARBR - RIP

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:14 AM
On Feb 17, 7:29 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fp849b$mk1$2@registered.motzarella.org...
>
> > Jym Dyer wrote:
> >> =x= I have Ed Dolan killfiled, but every now and then he pops
> >> up when I switch newsreader configurations around. Here he
> >> is, singing the same old same old same old out-of-tune tune:
>
> >>> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed
> >>> Gin in the Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
>
> >> =x= The number of people care diminishes with your every
> >> massively-crossposted rotten missive. Several years ago is
> >> one thing; here and now, the problem is an entirely different
> >> Ed who is like a plague of boils on the tuckus of Usenet.
>
> > I am sure that whale poop is a valuable nutrition source for some plants
> > and animals. What comparable service does Ed Dolan offer?
>
> This is what passes for Tom Sherman wit. Anyone laughing? I thought not.
>
> Tom Sherman thinks he performs some services for these
> freaking-cycling-newgroups (all one word) by pontificating on trivia and
> occasionally advising some ignorant newbie on his bike problem. But all he
> is doing is huffing and puffing like the viper that he is. There is nothing
> Tom Sherman can contribute that is not already known in spades by anyone who
> has been around for a awhile. He has pretty much come to this conclusion
> himself as witness his most recent messages. He is a slow learner as are all
> scientific-engineering types.
>
> Tom Sherman's contributions these days are to attempt lame humor which no
> one ever responds to because they do not even know what he is referencing
> half the time. He has been reduced to a poor jokester. Between the two of
> us, we are going to kill ARBR

You just can't make up your mind can you? Now either Tom Sherman has
a vast knowledge about recumbents and has been a helpful mainstay of
ARBR or he is a worthless comic incapable of providing any worthwhile
information about recumbents, but you cant have it both ways. Either
you and Tom are going to kill ARBR or the criminal vandal troll beat
you to it, but again you can't have it both ways. Can you author
anything without contradicting yourself? The conundrum continues!

> - and it will be good riddance to the most
> miserable newsgroup that has ever existed on Usenet.

Blah ... blah ... blah ... same old tired bull****

> ARBR - RIP
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:20 AM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d91910e3-3b09-4334-867d-4061f645b021@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 16, 5:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:b850e562-2451-4fd9-9d78-bdf2dcd73307@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Feb 14, 5:20 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> ARBR was destroyed some years ago by the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin.
>> >> Jim
>> >> McNamara aided and abetted this criminal by bringing his personal feud
>> >> with
>> >> the scum bag to ARBR in the first place.
>>
>> > If you are going to lie, use some imagination and make it
>> > believable. Don't insult our intelligence by pissing over our
>> > shoulders and try to convince us it's raining. Until proof is
>> > provided, the readership can safely assume that this is just another
>> > example of one of Ed Dolan's unsubstantiated allegations. And
>> > uncorroborated assertion does not a fact make and that's a fact.
>>
>> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed Gin in the
>> Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
>> [...]
>
> I never denied that I had a [an] ongoing feud with the man, but I deny
> that
> I brought the feud to ARBR and until you can offer proof of your
> statement that I did, I contend that you are a liar, plain and
> simple.

Contend all you want. It takes two to tango you know.

In fact through cross posting Ed [he means Ed Gin, not Ed Dolan] spread our
feud across
> several newsgroups and even ported it over to a moderated forum where
> he was suspended from posting, but I repeat I have put the man behind
> me and move on and you cannot. You accuse me of covering the same old
> ground and not moving on and I have repeatedly requested you to
> refrain from covering the same old ground and requested you to move
> on. I am able to do so, You are not and therein lies the difference
> between us. The only time I mention Ed Gin is to request you to stop
> talking about the man, but you cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara

Ed Gin was the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR as a viable
newsgroup. You played a subsidiary role by accommodating the wretch. All I
ever did was swear a blue streak at him, but you tried to reason with him,
thereby prolonging the whole ungodly mess.

I do not wonder that you do not like the subject brought up, but ARBR is
what it is today because of Ed Gin - and you cannot escape your
responsibility for it either, at least not as long as I am here to remind
everyone of what happened.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:20 AM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c687949f-d3f2-4916-bf9b-31a5dc99e99b@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 17, 7:29 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
[...]
>> Tom Sherman's contributions these days are to attempt lame humor which no
>> one ever responds to because they do not even know what he is referencing
>> half the time. He has been reduced to a poor jokester. Between the two of
>> us, we are going to kill ARBR
>
> You just can't make up your mind can you? Now either Tom Sherman has
> a vast knowledge about recumbents and has been a helpful mainstay of
> ARBR or he is a worthless comic incapable of providing any worthwhile
> information about recumbents, but you cant have it both ways. Either
> you and Tom are going to kill ARBR or the criminal vandal troll beat
> you to it, but again you can't have it both ways. Can you author
> anything without contradicting yourself? The conundrum continues!

The Tom Sherman of today is not the Tom Sherman of yore. He has learned
along with the rest of us just how worthless newsgroups are.

ARBR is now dead for all practical purposes. The criminal vandal troll Ed
Gin killed it. All that is needed now is for someone to administer the coup
de grace.

By the way, learn how to edit a post why don't you?

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:22 AM
On Feb 19, 6:19 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c687949f-d3f2-4916-bf9b-31a5dc99e99b@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Feb 17, 7:29 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
> >> Tom Sherman's contributions these days are to attempt lame humor which no
> >> one ever responds to because they do not even know what he is referencing
> >> half the time. He has been reduced to a poor jokester. Between the two of
> >> us, we are going to kill ARBR
>
> > You just can't make up your mind can you? Now either Tom Sherman has
> > a vast knowledge about recumbents and has been a helpful mainstay of
> > ARBR or he is a worthless comic incapable of providing any worthwhile
> > information about recumbents, but you cant have it both ways. Either
> > you and Tom are going to kill ARBR or the criminal vandal troll beat
> > you to it, but again you can't have it both ways. Can you author
> > anything without contradicting yourself? The conundrum continues!
>
> The Tom Sherman of today is not the Tom Sherman of yore. He has learned
> along with the rest of us just how worthless newsgroups are.
>
> ARBR is now dead for all practical purposes. The criminal vandal troll Ed
> Gin killed it. All that is needed now is for someone to administer the coup
> de grace.
>
> By the way, learn how to edit a post why don't you?

By the way .... stop providing unrequested, unwanted, unwelcome and
unheeded advice why don't you? Nice attempt to weasel out as usual,
but the fact remains that you constantly and consistently contradict
yourself undermining your own credibility.

Jim

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:22 AM
On Feb 19, 6:38 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d91910e3-3b09-4334-867d-4061f645b021@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 5:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:b850e562-2451-4fd9-9d78-bdf2dcd73307@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Feb 14, 5:20 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> ARBR was destroyed some years ago by the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin.
> >> >> Jim
> >> >> McNamara aided and abetted this criminal by bringing his personal feud
> >> >> with
> >> >> the scum bag to ARBR in the first place.
>
> >> > If you are going to lie, use some imagination and make it
> >> > believable. Don't insult our intelligence by pissing over our
> >> > shoulders and try to convince us it's raining. Until proof is
> >> > provided, the readership can safely assume that this is just another
> >> > example of one of Ed Dolan's unsubstantiated allegations. And
> >> > uncorroborated assertion does not a fact make and that's a fact.
>
> >> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed Gin in the
> >> Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
> >> [...]
>
> > I never denied that I had a [an] ongoing feud with the man, but I deny
> > that
> > I brought the feud to ARBR and until you can offer proof of your
> > statement that I did, I contend that you are a liar, plain and
> > simple.
>
> Contend all you want. It takes two to tango you know.

Like I said, I never denied feuding with the man, but feuding and
"bring" the feud to ARBR are not one an then same and I still
anxiously await your proof to substantiate your outrageous assertion
that I did. It appears you are having more trouble baking up your lie
thatn you did lying in the first place.

> In fact through cross posting Ed [he means Ed Gin, not Ed Dolan] spread our
> feud across
>
> > several newsgroups and even ported it over to a moderated forum where
> > he was suspended from posting, but I repeat I have put the man behind
> > me and move on and you cannot. You accuse me of covering the same old
> > ground and not moving on and I have repeatedly requested you to
> > refrain from covering the same old ground and requested you to move
> > on. I am able to do so, You are not and therein lies the difference
> > between us. The only time I mention Ed Gin is to request you to stop
> > talking about the man, but you cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara
>
> Ed Gin was the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR as a viable
> newsgroup. You played a subsidiary role by accommodating the wretch. All I
> ever did was swear a blue streak at him, but you tried to reason with him,
> thereby prolonging the whole ungodly mess.

I tend to try to reason with someone rather than swear at them because
thats what a reasonable, rationale person does. I don't expect you to
understand that.

> I do not wonder that you do not like the subject brought up, but ARBR is
> what it is today because of Ed Gin - and you cannot escape your
> responsibility for it either, at least not as long as I am here to remind
> everyone of what happened.

You should have been a historical revisionist. Your twisted spin on
things I take at face value (read worthless) and I am not the least
bit troubled, but I remind you that I've put all this behind me. You
live in the past and rehash the past ad nauseum. You are incapable of
putting the past behind you. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot
make a post without once again recycling time worn, regurgitated crap
that we have all hear countless times before. Repetition is you
middle name.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:24 AM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fad6603a-8f71-4a73-a44d-5e03dd4b6424@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 19, 6:38 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:d91910e3-3b09-4334-867d-4061f645b021@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 16, 5:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:b850e562-2451-4fd9-9d78-bdf2dcd73307@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > On Feb 14, 5:20 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> >> ARBR was destroyed some years ago by the criminal vandal troll Ed
>> >> >> Gin.
>> >> >> Jim
>> >> >> McNamara aided and abetted this criminal by bringing his personal
>> >> >> feud
>> >> >> with
>> >> >> the scum bag to ARBR in the first place.
>>
>> >> > If you are going to lie, use some imagination and make it
>> >> > believable. Don't insult our intelligence by pissing over our
>> >> > shoulders and try to convince us it's raining. Until proof is
>> >> > provided, the readership can safely assume that this is just another
>> >> > example of one of Ed Dolan's unsubstantiated allegations. And
>> >> > uncorroborated assertion does not a fact make and that's a fact.
>>
>> >> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed Gin in the
>> >> Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
>> >> [...]
>>
>> > I never denied that I had a [an] ongoing feud with the man, but I deny
>> > that
>> > I brought the feud to ARBR and until you can offer proof of your
>> > statement that I did, I contend that you are a liar, plain and
>> > simple.
>>
>> Contend all you want. It takes two to tango you know.
>
> Like I said, I never denied feuding with the man, but feuding and
> "bring" the feud to ARBR are not one an then same and I still
> anxiously await your proof to substantiate your outrageous assertion
> that I did. It appears you are having more trouble baking up your lie
> thatn you did lying in the first place.

All you had to do was tell him to go **** himself, but you were too stupid
to know enough to do that.

>> In fact through cross posting Ed [he means Ed Gin, not Ed Dolan] spread
>> our
>> feud across
>>
>> > several newsgroups and even ported it over to a moderated forum where
>> > he was suspended from posting, but I repeat I have put the man behind
>> > me and move on and you cannot. You accuse me of covering the same old
>> > ground and not moving on and I have repeatedly requested you to
>> > refrain from covering the same old ground and requested you to move
>> > on. I am able to do so, You are not and therein lies the difference
>> > between us. The only time I mention Ed Gin is to request you to stop
>> > talking about the man, but you cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara
>>
>> Ed Gin was the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR as a viable
>> newsgroup. You played a subsidiary role by accommodating the wretch. All
>> I
>> ever did was swear a blue streak at him, but you tried to reason with
>> him,
>> thereby prolonging the whole ungodly mess.
>
> I tend to try to reason with someone rather than swear at them because
> thats what a reasonable, rationale person does. I don't expect you to
> understand that.

But you KNEW what kind of person he was! You can reason with me because I am
not a criminal vandal troll like Ed Gin. You seem to have no sense of
people.

>> I do not wonder that you do not like the subject brought up, but ARBR is
>> what it is today because of Ed Gin - and you cannot escape your
>> responsibility for it either, at least not as long as I am here to remind
>> everyone of what happened.
>
> You should have been a historical revisionist. Your twisted spin on
> things I take at face value (read worthless) and I am not the least
> bit troubled, but I remind you that I've put all this behind me. You
> live in the past and rehash the past ad nauseum. You are incapable of
> putting the past behind you. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot
> make a post without once again recycling time worn, regurgitated crap
> that we have all hear countless times before. Repetition is you
> middle name.

An easy solution is for you to stop stalking me. After all, the only
association I have with you is over the Ed Gin episode.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:25 AM
On Feb 20, 2:45 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fad6603a-8f71-4a73-a44d-5e03dd4b6424@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 6:38 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:d91910e3-3b09-4334-867d-4061f645b021@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Feb 16, 5:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:b850e562-2451-4fd9-9d78-bdf2dcd73307@n75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> > On Feb 14, 5:20 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> >> [...]
> >> >> >> ARBR was destroyed some years ago by the criminal vandal troll Ed
> >> >> >> Gin.
> >> >> >> Jim
> >> >> >> McNamara aided and abetted this criminal by bringing his personal
> >> >> >> feud
> >> >> >> with
> >> >> >> the scum bag to ARBR in the first place.
>
> >> >> > If you are going to lie, use some imagination and make it
> >> >> > believable. Don't insult our intelligence by pissing over our
> >> >> > shoulders and try to convince us it's raining. Until proof is
> >> >> > provided, the readership can safely assume that this is just another
> >> >> > example of one of Ed Dolan's unsubstantiated allegations. And
> >> >> > uncorroborated assertion does not a fact make and that's a fact.
>
> >> >> All anyone has to do is look up your back and forth with Ed Gin in the
> >> >> Google Archive for ARBR from several years ago.
> >> >> [...]
>
> >> > I never denied that I had a [an] ongoing feud with the man, but I deny
> >> > that
> >> > I brought the feud to ARBR and until you can offer proof of your
> >> > statement that I did, I contend that you are a liar, plain and
> >> > simple.
>
> >> Contend all you want. It takes two to tango you know.
>
> > Like I said, I never denied feuding with the man, but feuding and
> > "bring" the feud to ARBR are not one an then same and I still
> > anxiously await your proof to substantiate your outrageous assertion
> > that I did. It appears you are having more trouble baking up your lie
> > thatn you did lying in the first place.
>
> All you had to do was tell him to go **** himself, but you were too stupid
> to know enough to do that.

Sure I could have, but stupidity isn't what prevented me from doing
that. I simply chose not to stoop to his and your level. Why is this
simple notion so difficult for the "great one" to comprehend? My
unwillingness to do as you do is not an indication that I am stupid.
It is an indication that I am more of a gentleman. YOu seem no to
understand that It is not within you purview for you to determine or
dictate what is appropriate for me to do or not do.

> >> In fact through cross posting Ed [he means Ed Gin, not Ed Dolan] spread
> >> our
> >> feud across
>
> >> > several newsgroups and even ported it over to a moderated forum where
> >> > he was suspended from posting, but I repeat I have put the man behind
> >> > me and move on and you cannot. You accuse me of covering the same old
> >> > ground and not moving on and I have repeatedly requested you to
> >> > refrain from covering the same old ground and requested you to move
> >> > on. I am able to do so, You are not and therein lies the difference
> >> > between us. The only time I mention Ed Gin is to request you to stop
> >> > talking about the man, but you cannot and will not. - Jim McNamara
>
> >> Ed Gin was the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR as a viable
> >> newsgroup. You played a subsidiary role by accommodating the wretch. All
> >> I
> >> ever did was swear a blue streak at him, but you tried to reason with
> >> him,
> >> thereby prolonging the whole ungodly mess.
>
> > I tend to try to reason with someone rather than swear at them because
> > thats what a reasonable, rationale person does. I don't expect you to
> > understand that.
>
> But you KNEW what kind of person he was!

Over time yes, and when I realized what ad who he was, the feud
commenced, but I have since put the man behind me and moved on. For
some peculiar reason you cannot do the same. I have no compulsion to
mention his name in this forum except to request that you refrain from
doing so. Everyone has heard it umteen guzilliion times before. You
can stop now or have you no self-control?

> You can reason with me because I am
> not a criminal vandal troll like Ed Gin. You seem to have no sense of
> people.

No one can reason with someone as unreasonable as you. One who has no
social contact with people can't possibly have anything but a warped
and jaded perspective concerning another's sense of people.

> >> I do not wonder that you do not like the subject brought up, but ARBR is
> >> what it is today because of Ed Gin - and you cannot escape your
> >> responsibility for it either, at least not as long as I am here to remind
> >> everyone of what happened.
>
> > You should have been a historical revisionist. Your twisted spin on
> > things I take at face value (read worthless) and I am not the least
> > bit troubled, but I remind you that I've put all this behind me. You
> > live in the past and rehash the past ad nauseum. You are incapable of
> > putting the past behind you. I'm beginning to believe that you cannot
> > make a post without once again recycling time worn, regurgitated crap
> > that we have all hear countless times before. Repetition is you
> > middle name.
>
> An easy solution is for you to stop stalking me. After all, the only
> association I have with you is over the Ed Gin episode.

If I were to be gone tomorrow, you would continue to rave and rant
about Ed Gin ... the criminal vandal troll that destroyed ARBR, so
there is no reason to pretend otherwise. Nor should you blame your
association with me as an excuse for recounting the Ed GIn Episode
over and over again. Man you really need to get a grip. Either that
or the nurse should pry your hands off the keyboard an put you back in
your straight-jacket.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:27 AM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a3aab13e-2795-4f58-a4f9-feac0e626668@62g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 20, 2:45 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
[...]
>> All you had to do was tell him to go **** himself, but you were too
>> stupid
>> to know enough to do that.
>
> Sure I could have, but stupidity isn't what prevented me from doing
> that. I simply chose not to stoop to his and your level. Why is this
> simple notion so difficult for the "great one" to comprehend? My
> unwillingness to do as you do is not an indication that I am stupid.
> It is an indication that I am more of a gentleman. YOu seem no to
> understand that It is not within you purview for you to determine or
> dictate what is appropriate for me to do or not do.

You were subjecting the entire newsgroup to your personal feud with Ed Gin.
As with me, you do not know when to let go of something. You went on and on
with him just as you are now doing with me, never seeming to realize when
something is over. It is the hallmark of a stalker. I don't think Ed Gin,
whatever his other faults, was ever a stalker.
[...]

>> But you KNEW what kind of person he was!
>
> Over time yes, and when I realized what ad who he was, the feud
> commenced, but I have since put the man behind me and moved on. For
> some peculiar reason you cannot do the same. I have no compulsion to
> mention his name in this forum except to request that you refrain from
> doing so. Everyone has heard it umteen guzilliion times before. You
> can stop now or have you no self-control?

His name is less likely to be mentioned by me or anyone else once you stop
your stalking.

>> You can reason with me because I am
>> not a criminal vandal troll like Ed Gin. You seem to have no sense of
>> people.
>
> No one can reason with someone as unreasonable as you. One who has no
> social contact with people can't possibly have anything but a warped
> and jaded perspective concerning another's sense of people.

It is only us hermits who have any perspective on mankind. The rest of you
are too involved and can't see the forest for the trees.
[...]

>> An easy solution is for you to stop stalking me. After all, the only
>> association I have with you is over the Ed Gin episode.
>
> If I were to be gone tomorrow, you would continue to rave and rant
> about Ed Gin ... the criminal vandal troll that destroyed ARBR, so
> there is no reason to pretend otherwise. Nor should you blame your
> association with me as an excuse for recounting the Ed GIn Episode
> over and over again. Man you really need to get a grip. Either that
> or the nurse should pry your hands off the keyboard an put you back in
> your straight-jacket.

Stop stalking and see what happens. Your name only gets mentioned in
connection with Ed Gin when you bring the matter up.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:30 AM
On Feb 21, 9:22 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a3aab13e-2795-4f58-a4f9-feac0e626668@62g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Feb 20, 2:45 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
> >> All you had to do was tell him to go **** himself, but you were too
> >> stupid
> >> to know enough to do that.
>
> > Sure I could have, but stupidity isn't what prevented me from doing
> > that. I simply chose not to stoop to his and your level. Why is this
> > simple notion so difficult for the "great one" to comprehend? My
> > unwillingness to do as you do is not an indication that I am stupid.
> > It is an indication that I am more of a gentleman. You seem not to
> > understand that It is not within your purview to determine or dictate
> > what is appropriate for me to do or not do.
>
> You were subjecting the entire newsgroup to your personal feud with Ed Gin.
> As with me, you do not know when to let go of something. You went on and on
> with him just as you are now doing with me, never seeming to realize when
> something is over. It is the hallmark of a stalker. I don't think Ed Gin,
> whatever his other faults, was ever a stalker.
> [...]

If you realize when something is over and know when to let go of
something then realize and let go of this as I have asked. Ed Gin is
gone. My feud with Ed Gin is long over with. ARBR is still hear. Ed
Gin did not kill it. Let it go and move on. I you realize that is
all over and really can let go, then do so. Never mention the man
again. You can't do that can you?

> >> But you KNEW what kind of person he was!
>
> > Over time yes, and when I realized what and who he was, the feud
> > commenced, but I have since put the man behind me and moved on. For
> > some peculiar reason you cannot do the same. I have no compulsion to
> > mention his name in this forum except to request that you refrain from
> > doing so. Everyone has heard it umteen guzilliion times before. You
> > can stop now or have you no self-control?
>
> His name is less likely to be mentioned by me or anyone else once you stop
> your stalking.

As if the two have anything to do with one another? Why Am I trying
to reason with a complete idiot?

> >> You can reason with me because I am
> >> not a criminal vandal troll like Ed Gin. You seem to have no sense of
> >> people.
>
> > No one can reason with someone as unreasonable as you. One who has no
> > social contact with people can't possibly have anything but a warped
> > and jaded perspective concerning another's sense of people.
>
> It is only us hermits who have any perspective on mankind. The rest of you
> are too involved and can't see the forest for the trees.
> [...]

One cannot have any perspective on mankind when one has no contact
with mankind since there is no point of reference.

> >> An easy solution is for you to stop stalking me. After all, the only
> >> association I have with you is over the Ed Gin episode.
>
> > If I were to be gone tomorrow, you would continue to rave and rant
> > about Ed Gin ... the criminal vandal troll that destroyed ARBR, so
> > there is no reason to pretend otherwise. Nor should you blame your
> > association with me as an excuse for recounting the Ed GIn Episode
> > over and over again. Man you really need to get a grip. Either that
> > or the nurse should pry your hands off the keyboard an put you back in
> > your straight-jacket.
>
> Stop stalking and see what happens. Your name only gets mentioned in
> connection with Ed Gin when you bring the matter up.

When I bring what matter up??? I do not bring the Ed Gin matter
up ... you do ... you know the OLD bull**** ... the criminal vandal
who destroyed ARBR ... NOT!!!!! All I have ever done is object to the
preposterous, monotonous repetition of this falsehood. There is no
reason for you to mention Ed Gin in objection to being "stalked". One
has nothing to do with the other no matter what kind of spin you
vainly attempt to put on things.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

retroguybilly@gmail.com
01-04-1970, 03:30 AM
Nice Going, Ed! That's telling 'em!

As usual, your observations are extremely perceptive and right on the
mark.

Please keep up the good work!

We always enjoy reading your posts.

Best of luck to you.

Michael Press
01-04-1970, 03:46 AM
In article
<0fec48b4-7559-440c-b9d7-96b4e8686eca@72g2000hsu.googlegroups.com>,
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote:

I do not understand the Subject: line.
ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

--
Michael Press

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:52 AM
"Michael Press" <rubrum@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:rubrum-5C5B10.21334124022008@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> In article
> <0fec48b4-7559-440c-b9d7-96b4e8686eca@72g2000hsu.googlegroups.com>,
[...]

> I do not understand the Subject: line.
> ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.

It is all garbage being posted by blackguards and knaves, scoundrels and
charlatans, idiots and imbeciles. Only Ed Dolan the Great saves the group
from itself!

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:52 AM
On Feb 24, 11:33 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <0fec48b4-7559-440c-b9d7-96b4e8686...@72g2000hsu.googlegroups.com>,
>
> JimmyMac <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I do not understand the Subject: line.
> ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.
>
> --
> Michael Press

And I don't understand why this was attributed to me, but no biggie.

Tom Sherman
01-04-1970, 03:52 AM
Michael Press wrote:
>
> I do not understand the Subject: line.
> ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.
>
And most of the traffic is off-topic posts by Mr. Ed the Grate.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:53 AM
<retroguybilly@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:410c6222-aa31-46b0-b82f-447d575ffeda@z70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Nice Going, Ed! That's telling 'em!
>
> As usual, your observations are extremely perceptive and right on the
> mark.
>
> Please keep up the good work!
>
> We always enjoy reading your posts.
>
> Best of luck to you.

Just a note from one of my many admirers!

It is a message like this that encourages the Great One in His mission of
bringing enlightenment to all the denizens of these confounded cycling
newsgroups. If I don't tell them what is good for them, who will. It is a
heavy responsibility, but one that Ed Dolan the Great shoulders with
resignation. It is part of my noblesse oblige, which I bestow freely on my
inferiors with no thought of personal gain. Now you know why I am also a
Great Saint - and a long-suffering One at that.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

Michael Press
01-04-1970, 03:56 AM
In article
<b2acf687-3f36-4bc8-a81b-07f6699640a7@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
JimmyMac <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Feb 24, 11:33 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > In article
> > <0fec48b4-7559-440c-b9d7-96b4e8686...@72g2000hsu.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > JimmyMac <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > I do not understand the Subject: line.
> > ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.
>
> And I don't understand why this was attributed to me, but no biggie.

It is not. Count the quote indentations.
I was sloppy. I should have left off the
attribution line or indicated excised text.
Sorry for the trouble.

--
Michael Press

Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 03:57 AM
"Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fpvt9i$1s9$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> Michael Press wrote:
>>
>> I do not understand the Subject: line.
>> ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.
>>
> And most of the traffic is off-topic posts by Mr. Ed the Grate.

Tom Sherman is jealous, ever the failing of midgets and dwarfs like him with
small minds. In the "good old days" he dominated this newsgroup by hook or
crook. Most of his posts were then off-topic too. I have more or less
reformed him and he no longer sins so egregiously.

Ed Dolan the Great is like a Great White Shark who patrols these ARBR waters
and sees to it that everyone stays in their proper place. Yea, ARBR has been
cleansed and made pure by Ed Dolan the Great, aka Saint Edward the Great.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:57 AM
On Feb 25, 8:24 pm, Tom Sherman <sunsetss0...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com>
wrote:
> Michael Press wrote:
>
> > I do not understand the Subject: line.
> > ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.
>
> And most of the traffic is off-topic posts by Mr. Ed the Grate.
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
> The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

And to be perfectly frank, I have contributed, though primarily to
pitch a ***** about HEAD Dolan the GRATE's off-topic posts.

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:57 AM
On Feb 25, 10:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fpvt9i$1s9$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>
> > Michael Press wrote:
>
> >> I do not understand the Subject: line.
> >> ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.
>
> > And most of the traffic is off-topic posts by Mr. Ed the Grate.
>
> Tom Sherman is jealous, ever the failing of midgets and dwarfs like him with
> small minds. In the "good old days" he dominated this newsgroup by hook or
> crook. Most of his posts were then off-topic too. I have more or less
> reformed him and he no longer sins so egregiously.

TRANSLATION - I ED Dolan set the new standard for TROLL posts that
have nothing to do with recumbents.

> Ed Dolan the Great is like a Great White Shark who patrols these ARBR waters
> and sees to it that everyone stays in their proper place. Yea, ARBR has been
> cleansed and made pure by Ed Dolan the Great, aka Saint Edward the Great.

Delusion is such a comfort.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 03:58 AM
On Feb 26, 1:16 am, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> In article
> <b2acf687-3f36-4bc8-a81b-07f669964...@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>
> JimmyMac <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 24, 11:33 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <0fec48b4-7559-440c-b9d7-96b4e8686...@72g2000hsu.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > JimmyMac <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > I do not understand the Subject: line.
> > > ARBR seem to have plenty of traffic.
>
> > And I don't understand why this was attributed to me, but no biggie.
>
> It is not. Count the quote indentations.
> I was sloppy. I should have left off the
> attribution line or indicated excised text.
> Sorry for the trouble.
>
> --
> Michael Press

No trouble Michael ... like I previously indicated... no biggie.