View Full Version : Spoke Crossing
limeylew@gmail.com
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
I'm building a rear wheel with a Weinmann deep 'V' rim and a Sturmey
Archer hub.
The rim dia. is 577mm, the hub dia. is 65mm, the hub flange width is
55mm and it's a 28H.
My weight is about 160lb and I'll just be doing regular road riding on
this bike.
Can I do 3 cross, or would it be better to use 2 cross?
TIA.
Lewis.
*****
Chalo
01-04-1970, 08:34 AM
limeylew wrote:
>
> I'm building a rear wheel with a Weinmann deep 'V' rim and a Sturmey
> Archer hub.
>
> The rim dia. is 577mm, the hub dia. is 65mm, the hub flange width is
> 55mm and it's a 28H.
>
> My weight is about 160lb and I'll just be doing regular road riding on
> this bike.
>
> Can I do 3 cross, or would it be better to use 2 cross?
Cross-two is generally better for 28 hole, being close to the same
degree of tangency as 36 spokes laced cross-three. With a high-
flanged hub like yours, the angle of insertion to the rim is much
better with cross-two lacing.
Chalo
limeylew@gmail.com
01-04-1970, 08:35 AM
On Apr 25, 11:51 am, Chalo <chalo.col...@gmail.com> wrote:
> limeylew wrote:
>
> > I'm building a rear wheel with a Weinmann deep 'V' rim and a Sturmey
> > Archer hub.
>
> > The rim dia. is 577mm, the hub dia. is 65mm, the hub flange width is
> > 55mm and it's a 28H.
>
> > My weight is about 160lb and I'll just be doing regular road riding on
> > this bike.
>
> > Can I do 3 cross, or would it be better to use 2 cross?
>
> Cross-two is generally better for 28 hole, being close to the same
> degree of tangency as 36 spokes laced cross-three. With a high-
> flanged hub like yours, the angle of insertion to the rim is much
> better with cross-two lacing.
>
> Chalo
Thanks, Chalo, I appreciate it.
Lewis.
*****
vBulletin® v3.7.0 Release Candidate 1, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.