View Full Version : Tom Sherman - has he really gone for good?
Edward Dolan
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
It has now been a month since Tom Sherman posted to these honorable cycling
newsgroups. Has he finally left us after a decade of wretched posts to ARBR
on almost a daily basis. My God, I should live so long!
I came to this cycling newsgroup many years ago when I resolved to get rid
of all the liberals who were posting messages reeking of Bush hatred,
America hatred and Israel hatred. I believe I have succeeded. Only Tom
Sherman remained of the original scurrilous lot of liberals, but he was
chastened by the Great Ed Dolan and became increasingly trivialized. Most of
the former members of this newsgroup fled to BROL where they could be
properly chaperoned since that is a moderated forum. I heartily approved of
this flight and can take some credit for causing it.
An unmoderated newsgroup (most of Usenet) is an abomination and there is not
much good that can be said about it. It will draw all the scum bags in the
universe, most of whom are barely literate. Before you know it, everyone is
telling everyone else to go **** themselves. Well, that is Usenet for you.
Ed Dolan the Great will hang around for a bit longer to make sure that the
nefarious Tom Sherman does not return to dominate this newsgroup with his
traitorous liberalism. I would rather die than let that happen. As long as
there is breath in my body, I can assure one and all that Tom Sherman will
never have free reign on this newsgroup to say just any old stupid thing
that pops into his head.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Tom Sherman
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
Tim McNamara wrote:
> In article <g45oqo$ke3$3@registered.motzarella.org>,
> Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Edw*rd D*l*n wrote:
>>> - Hide quoted text -
>> Who?
>
> Please stop crossposting Ed Dolan's horse**** to r.b.t.
Now, is that any way to denigrate horse ****?
N.B. Mr. Ed's contribution deleted, thereby complying with Mr.
McNamara's request.
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
Edward Dolan
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
"Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:g45p16$lmi$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:2fb20324-fcd7-4716-8cd0-2d457b6382f7@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Jun 19, 2:14 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> I am telling you what you are. You are a stalker - period! Only
>>>> ****ed-up
>>>> wretches can be stalkers.
>>> And tit for tat, I'm telling you what you are ... a Tom Sherman
>>> stalker. Care to take a poll?
>>
>> Who is there to poll? Ed Gin and you destroyed this newsgroup (ARBR) some
>> years ago with your childish feud. Even Tom Sherman has left the group
>> because of you. He was embarrassed by your stalking of One so Great as
>> Myself and couldn't take it anymore.
>> [...]
>
> I was not aware of that.
Of course not. I know you better than you know yourself. That is why I am so
God Damn ****ing Great!
>> [...]
>> Nope, I would simply be a bit more careful what I say and how I say it.
>> But since there are no moderators on these newsgroups connected with
>> Usenet, it does not matter what is said or how it is said provided you do
>> not stoop to ultimate stupidity or criminality like Ed Gin did. He was a
>> criminal vandal troll and you made it possible by remonstrating with him.
>> You are culpable to that extent for having destroyed ARBR as a viable
>> newsgroup.
>>
>> Ed Gin and JimmyMac destroyed ARBR some years ago. Cowards like Tom
>> Sherman, Jon Meinecke and Peter Clinch stood by and let it happen. Only
>> Ed Dolan the Great acted honorably and indeed heroically and fought the
>> good fight. But it is easy to destroy a small newsgroup and not so easy
>> to build it up. Ed Dolan the Great now wishes only to see ARBR dead and
>> buried. The group was way too cowardly to deserve to live.
>>
> Hint to Mr. Ed Dolan - Ed Gin was NOT Johnny NoCom.
Who cares anymore at this point. They were all associated with one another.
I will continue to use 'Ed Gin' as the generic for what destroyed this
newsgroup. I harbor deep resentment against JimmyMac too for not taking my
very good advice to tell all those ****ers to go **** themselves. Instead,
he wanted to preach to them like a Baptist minister.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
"Tim McNamara" <timmcn@bitstream.net> wrote in message
news:timmcn-75D7AA.12594828062008@news.iphouse.com...
> In article <g45oqo$ke3$3@registered.motzarella.org>,
> Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> >
>> > My God ... I think Tom Sherman has really gone at last![...]
>>
>> Who?
>
> Please stop crossposting Ed Dolan's horse**** to r.b.t.
I find it impossible to believe that Tim McNamara is not somehow related to
that other ******* Jim McNamara of ARBR. Neither one of them ever have a
clue about anything. But RBT is composed solely of geeks and freaks. I must
be like a breath of fresh air to those assholes.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
12-31-1969, 08:00 PM
"Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:g5a90n$oqq$1@registered.motzarella.org...
> Edward Dolan wrote:
The only conclusion to be drawn is that Mike Vandeman is a genius just like
Ed Dolan the Great is a genius. On the other hand JimmyMac belongs to a
universe of idiots, all of whom seem to want to post their idiotic messages
to Usenet. Jeez, don't they have wives they can talk to?
Tom Sherman wrote:
>> ...
>> The only conclusion to be drawn is that Mike Vandeman is a gen[]us just
>> like Ed Dolan the Gr[]at[e] is a gen[]us....
>
> Indeed, Ed and Mikey are in their own genus.
As long as you don't include yourself in our genus I am satisfied. We Great
Ones do not belong to the common run such as yourself. I put you above
JimmyMac, but only slightly.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Tom Keats
01-04-1970, 11:41 AM
In article <UsCdnb5zXcwI2tbVnZ2dnUVZ_oninZ2d@prairiewave.com>,
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes:
> It has now been a month since Tom Sherman posted to these honorable cycling
> newsgroups. Has he finally left us after a decade of wretched posts to ARBR
> on almost a daily basis. My God, I should live so long!
>
> I came to this cycling newsgroup many years ago when I resolved to get rid
> of all the liberals who were posting messages reeking of Bush hatred,
> America hatred and Israel hatred. I believe I have succeeded. Only Tom
> Sherman remained of the original scurrilous lot of liberals, but he was
> chastened by the Great Ed Dolan and became increasingly trivialized. Most of
> the former members of this newsgroup fled to BROL where they could be
> properly chaperoned since that is a moderated forum. I heartily approved of
> this flight and can take some credit for causing it.
>
> An unmoderated newsgroup (most of Usenet) is an abomination and there is not
> much good that can be said about it. It will draw all the scum bags in the
> universe, most of whom are barely literate. Before you know it, everyone is
> telling everyone else to go **** themselves. Well, that is Usenet for you.
>
> Ed Dolan the Great will hang around for a bit longer to make sure that the
> nefarious Tom Sherman does not return to dominate this newsgroup with his
> traitorous liberalism. I would rather die than let that happen. As long as
> there is breath in my body, I can assure one and all that Tom Sherman will
> never have free reign on this newsgroup to say just any old stupid thing
> that pops into his head.
You're obviously concerned about your own mortality.
Perhaps even facing it like it's an oncoming truck
and you can't move even a single step out of its way.
Here's a few quotes that might cheer you up:
"What fools these mortals be."
-- Shakespeare
"Somebody up there likes me."
-- Malachi Constant, from Kurt Vonnegut's The Sirens of Titan
"The pitcher wound up and he flang the ball at the batter.
The batter swang and missed. The pitcher flang the ball
again and this time the batter connected. He hit a high fly
right to the center fielder. The center fielder was all set
to catch the ball, but at the last minute his eyes were blound
by the sun and he dropped it."
-- Dizzy Dean
"I'm not a crook."
-- Richard M. Nixon
"Writing about music is like dancing about architecture."
-- Frank Zappa
"**** off."
-- Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau.
"Horse sense is a thing a horse has, which keeps it
from betting on people."
-- W.C. Fields
cheers,
Tom
--
Nothing is safe from me.
I'm really at:
tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 11:41 AM
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> wrote in message
news:UsCdnb5zXcwI2tbVnZ2dnUVZ_oninZ2d@prairiewave. com...
> It has now been a month since Tom Sherman posted to these honorable
> cycling newsgroups. Has he finally left us after a decade of wretched
> posts to ARBR on almost a daily basis. My God, I should live so long!
>
> I came to this cycling newsgroup many years ago when I resolved to get rid
> of all the liberals who were posting messages reeking of Bush hatred,
> America hatred and Israel hatred. I believe I have succeeded. Only Tom
> Sherman remained of the original scurrilous lot of liberals, but he was
> chastened by the Great Ed Dolan and became increasingly trivialized. Most
> of the former members of this newsgroup fled to BROL where they could be
> properly chaperoned since that is a moderated forum. I heartily approved
> of this flight and can take some credit for causing it.
>
> An unmoderated newsgroup (most of Usenet) is an abomination and there is
> not much good that can be said about it. It will draw all the scum bags in
> the universe, most of whom are barely literate. Before you know it,
> everyone is telling everyone else to go **** themselves. Well, that is
> Usenet for you.
>
> Ed Dolan the Great will hang around for a bit longer to make sure that the
> nefarious Tom Sherman does not return to dominate this newsgroup with his
> traitorous liberalism. I would rather die than let that happen. As long as
> there is breath in my body, I can assure one and all that Tom Sherman will
> never have free reign on this newsgroup to say just any old stupid thing
> that pops into his head.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
My God ... I think Tom Sherman has really gone at last! Oh happy day! Now my
heart can be light and rejoice in that the worst scoundrel ever to infest
these newsgroups is truly gone. I say worst scoundrel because he was also
intelligent. A dumb scoundrel is no threat to anyone (except to Jim McNamara
of course).
These newsgroups will have arrived at perfection when it is just Ed Dolan
the Great commiserating with Himself. Yea, He is a universe unto Himself and
does not need or want any others polluting these sacred precincts. My
Greatness demands solitary grandeur. The rest of you can skedaddle the same
as Tom Sherman.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 11:42 AM
"Tom Keats" <tomkeats@bud.garden.local> wrote in message
news:iruf2g.g14.ln@vcn.bc.ca...
> In article <UsCdnb5zXcwI2tbVnZ2dnUVZ_oninZ2d@prairiewave.com>,
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes:
>> It has now been a month since Tom Sherman posted to these honorable
>> cycling
>> newsgroups. Has he finally left us after a decade of wretched posts to
>> ARBR
>> on almost a daily basis. My God, I should live so long!
>>
>> I came to this cycling newsgroup many years ago when I resolved to get
>> rid
>> of all the liberals who were posting messages reeking of Bush hatred,
>> America hatred and Israel hatred. I believe I have succeeded. Only Tom
>> Sherman remained of the original scurrilous lot of liberals, but he was
>> chastened by the Great Ed Dolan and became increasingly trivialized. Most
>> of
>> the former members of this newsgroup fled to BROL where they could be
>> properly chaperoned since that is a moderated forum. I heartily approved
>> of
>> this flight and can take some credit for causing it.
>>
>> An unmoderated newsgroup (most of Usenet) is an abomination and there is
>> not
>> much good that can be said about it. It will draw all the scum bags in
>> the
>> universe, most of whom are barely literate. Before you know it, everyone
>> is
>> telling everyone else to go **** themselves. Well, that is Usenet for
>> you.
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great will hang around for a bit longer to make sure that
>> the
>> nefarious Tom Sherman does not return to dominate this newsgroup with his
>> traitorous liberalism. I would rather die than let that happen. As long
>> as
>> there is breath in my body, I can assure one and all that Tom Sherman
>> will
>> never have free reign on this newsgroup to say just any old stupid thing
>> that pops into his head.
>
> You're obviously concerned about your own mortality.
> Perhaps even facing it like it's an oncoming truck
> and you can't move even a single step out of its way.
>
> Here's a few quotes that might cheer you up:
>
> "What fools these mortals be."
> -- Shakespeare
>
> "Somebody up there likes me."
> -- Malachi Constant, from Kurt Vonnegut's The Sirens of Titan
>
> "The pitcher wound up and he flang the ball at the batter.
> The batter swang and missed. The pitcher flang the ball
> again and this time the batter connected. He hit a high fly
> right to the center fielder. The center fielder was all set
> to catch the ball, but at the last minute his eyes were blound
> by the sun and he dropped it."
> -- Dizzy Dean
>
> "I'm not a crook."
> -- Richard M. Nixon
>
> "Writing about music is like dancing about architecture."
> -- Frank Zappa
>
> "**** off."
> -- Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau.
>
> "Horse sense is a thing a horse has, which keeps it
> from betting on people."
> -- W.C. Fields
Why would someone who has been on a group for a decade just go slinking off
into the night without making a grand and final farewell. Hells Bells, I
have already taken 8 final farewells from these freaking cycling newsgroups
with much cussing and swearing and slamming of doors. Parting is such sweet
sorrow that you have got to do it many times. Tom Sherman will forever
remain a mystery to me. He seemed like a man without a personality.
As Tom Keats is a philosopher like me (but not so Great, of course) I now
give him all the wisdom he will ever need in this forlorn world in one
succinct sentence:
"Once I wasn't, then I was, now I ain't again."
- Epitaph found on tombstone in Ohio graveyard
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Tom Keats
01-04-1970, 11:42 AM
In article <lrCdnYKZ3dYPWtbVnZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@prairiewave.com>,
"Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes:
>> You're obviously concerned about your own mortality.
>> Perhaps even facing it like it's an oncoming truck
>> and you can't move even a single step out of its way.
>>
>> Here's a few quotes that might cheer you up:
>>
>> "What fools these mortals be."
>> -- Shakespeare
>>
>> "Somebody up there likes me."
>> -- Malachi Constant, from Kurt Vonnegut's The Sirens of Titan
>>
>> "The pitcher wound up and he flang the ball at the batter.
>> The batter swang and missed. The pitcher flang the ball
>> again and this time the batter connected. He hit a high fly
>> right to the center fielder. The center fielder was all set
>> to catch the ball, but at the last minute his eyes were blound
>> by the sun and he dropped it."
>> -- Dizzy Dean
>>
>> "I'm not a crook."
>> -- Richard M. Nixon
>>
>> "Writing about music is like dancing about architecture."
>> -- Frank Zappa
>>
>> "**** off."
>> -- Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau.
>>
>> "Horse sense is a thing a horse has, which keeps it
>> from betting on people."
>> -- W.C. Fields
>
> Why would someone who has been on a group for a decade just go slinking off
> into the night without making a grand and final farewell. Hells Bells, I
> have already taken 8 final farewells from these freaking cycling newsgroups
> with much cussing and swearing and slamming of doors. Parting is such sweet
> sorrow that you have got to do it many times. Tom Sherman will forever
> remain a mystery to me. He seemed like a man without a personality.
>
> As Tom Keats is a philosopher like me (but not so Great, of course) I now
^^^^^^^^^^^
I vehemently, passionately abhor philosophy!
It, like Artificial Intelligence, is an extremely
regrettable waste of perfectly good mathematics.
Bertrand Russell and his ilk wouldn't know a real
world if one jumped up and bit 'em on the ass.
I guess if that happened, they'd ponder the hell
out of it. Probably just to take their minds off
the pain in their sore asses.
> give him all the wisdom he will ever need in this forlorn world in one
> succinct sentence:
>
> "Once I wasn't, then I was, now I ain't again."
>
> - Epitaph found on tombstone in Ohio graveyard
"If I can't take it with me, then I'm not goin'!"
-- some cat from a Merrie Melodies cartoon
"King Kong Died For Our Sins"
-- caption on a three-eye'd freaky kid's t-shirt,
from MAD magazine
"He's outside, looking in"
-- Moody Blues/Legend of a Mind
And just for the record, I'm not a longshoreman (yet.)
I'm currently just an overly-skilled warehouseman.
cheers,
Tom
--
Nothing is safe from me.
I'm really at:
tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 11:44 AM
"Tom Keats" <tkeats2005@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:l6kh2g.0u4.ln@vcn.bc.ca...
> In article <lrCdnYKZ3dYPWtbVnZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@prairiewave.com>,
> "Edward Dolan" <edolan@iw.net> writes:
[...]
>> As Tom Keats is a philosopher like me (but not so Great, of course) I now
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I vehemently, passionately abhor philosophy!
> It, like Artificial Intelligence, is an extremely
> regrettable waste of perfectly good mathematics.
>
> Bertrand Russell and his ilk wouldn't know a real
> world if one jumped up and bit 'em on the ass.
> I guess if that happened, they'd ponder the hell
> out of it. Probably just to take their minds off
> the pain in their sore asses.
Philosophy went terribly astray with the likes of Bertrand Russell. It
became a linguistic nightmare which marked the end of philosophy.
Philosophy in the traditional sense is nothing more than an idle speculation
on life, its truths, values and moralities. It has to do with how we should
best live our lives. What is there about this that you do not understand?
[...]
> And just for the record, I'm not a longshoreman (yet.)
> I'm currently just an overly-skilled warehouseman.
You are a workingman pure and simple. However, you have the potential to
become another Eric Hoffer. Hang in there and do not neglect the reading of
books and, who knows, maybe someday you can be Great like Me!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:10 PM
On Jun 13, 11:09 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote in message
>
> news:UsCdnb5zXcwI2tbVnZ2dnUVZ_oninZ2d@prairiewave. com...
>
>
>
> > It has now been a month since Tom Sherman posted to these honorable
> > cycling newsgroups. Has he finally left us after a decade of wretched
> > posts to ARBR on almost a daily basis. My God, I should live so long!
>
> > I came to this cycling newsgroup many years ago when I resolved to get rid
> > of all the liberals who were posting messages reeking of Bush hatred,
> > America hatred and Israel hatred. I believe I have succeeded. Only Tom
> > Sherman remained of the original scurrilous lot of liberals, but he was
> > chastened by the Great Ed Dolan and became increasingly trivialized. Most
> > of the former members of this newsgroup fled to BROL where they could be
> > properly chaperoned since that is a moderated forum. I heartily approved
> > of this flight and can take some credit for causing it.
>
> > An unmoderated newsgroup (most of Usenet) is an abomination and there is
> > not much good that can be said about it. It will draw all the scum bags in
> > the universe, most of whom are barely literate. Before you know it,
> > everyone is telling everyone else to go **** themselves. Well, that is
> > Usenet for you.
>
> > Ed Dolan the Great will hang around for a bit longer to make sure that the
> > nefarious Tom Sherman does not return to dominate this newsgroup with his
> > traitorous liberalism. I would rather die than let that happen. As long as
> > there is breath in my body, I can assure one and all that Tom Sherman will
> > never have free reign on this newsgroup to say just any old stupid thing
> > that pops into his head.
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> My God ... I think Tom Sherman has really gone at last! Oh happy day! Now my
> heart can be light and rejoice in that the worst scoundrel ever to infest
> these newsgroups is truly gone. I say worst scoundrel because he was also
> intelligent. A dumb scoundrel is no threat to anyone (except to Jim McNamara
> of course).
>
> These newsgroups will have arrived at perfection when it is just Ed Dolan
> the Great commiserating with Himself. Yea, He is a universe unto Himself and
> does not need or want any others polluting these sacred precincts.
A single word best describes your pugnacious prolixity on ARBR ...
CONTAMINANT!!!
> My Greatness demands solitary grandeur. The rest of you can skedaddle the same
> as Tom Sherman.
You've obviously been a jerk your entire life. Why don't you take a
day off?
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Tom Sherman
01-04-1970, 12:10 PM
Edward Dolan wrote:
>
> My God ... I think Tom Sherman has really gone at last![...]
Who?
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 12:14 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:29d62225-f2f1-43e6-a568-d57cf044da0a@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 13, 11:09 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:UsCdnb5zXcwI2tbVnZ2dnUVZ_oninZ2d@prairiewave. com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > It has now been a month since Tom Sherman posted to these honorable
>> > cycling newsgroups. Has he finally left us after a decade of wretched
>> > posts to ARBR on almost a daily basis. My God, I should live so long!
>>
>> > I came to this cycling newsgroup many years ago when I resolved to get
>> > rid
>> > of all the liberals who were posting messages reeking of Bush hatred,
>> > America hatred and Israel hatred. I believe I have succeeded. Only Tom
>> > Sherman remained of the original scurrilous lot of liberals, but he was
>> > chastened by the Great Ed Dolan and became increasingly trivialized.
>> > Most
>> > of the former members of this newsgroup fled to BROL where they could
>> > be
>> > properly chaperoned since that is a moderated forum. I heartily
>> > approved
>> > of this flight and can take some credit for causing it.
>>
>> > An unmoderated newsgroup (most of Usenet) is an abomination and there
>> > is
>> > not much good that can be said about it. It will draw all the scum bags
>> > in
>> > the universe, most of whom are barely literate. Before you know it,
>> > everyone is telling everyone else to go **** themselves. Well, that is
>> > Usenet for you.
>>
>> > Ed Dolan the Great will hang around for a bit longer to make sure that
>> > the
>> > nefarious Tom Sherman does not return to dominate this newsgroup with
>> > his
>> > traitorous liberalism. I would rather die than let that happen. As long
>> > as
>> > there is breath in my body, I can assure one and all that Tom Sherman
>> > will
>> > never have free reign on this newsgroup to say just any old stupid
>> > thing
>> > that pops into his head.
>>
>> > Regards,
>>
>> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> > aka
>> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>>
>> My God ... I think Tom Sherman has really gone at last! Oh happy day! Now
>> my
>> heart can be light and rejoice in that the worst scoundrel ever to infest
>> these newsgroups is truly gone. I say worst scoundrel because he was also
>> intelligent. A dumb scoundrel is no threat to anyone (except to Jim
>> McNamara
>> of course).
>>
>> These newsgroups will have arrived at perfection when it is just Ed Dolan
>> the Great commiserating with Himself. Yea, He is a universe unto Himself
>> and
>> does not need or want any others polluting these sacred precincts.
>
> A single word best describes your pugnacious prolixity on ARBR ...
> CONTAMINANT!!!
>
>> My Greatness demands solitary grandeur. The rest of you can skedaddle the
>> same
>> as Tom Sherman.
>
> You've obviously been a jerk your entire life. Why don't you take a
> day off?
All you ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up here
like a bad penny. It is fun to do this. I urge the rest of you to do this
too and then you can have your own personal stalker just like I do. The name
is 'Jim McNamara'. You can never be Great like I am unless you have your own
personal stalker.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:14 PM
On Jun 14, 7:42 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:29d62225-f2f1-43e6-a568-d57cf044da0a@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jun 13, 11:09 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote in message
>
> >>news:UsCdnb5zXcwI2tbVnZ2dnUVZ_oninZ2d@prairiewave. com...
>
> >> > It has now been a month since Tom Sherman posted to these honorable
> >> > cycling newsgroups. Has he finally left us after a decade of wretched
> >> > posts to ARBR on almost a daily basis. My God, I should live so long!
>
> >> > I came to this cycling newsgroup many years ago when I resolved to get
> >> > rid
> >> > of all the liberals who were posting messages reeking of Bush hatred,
> >> > America hatred and Israel hatred. I believe I have succeeded. Only Tom
> >> > Sherman remained of the original scurrilous lot of liberals, but he was
> >> > chastened by the Great Ed Dolan and became increasingly trivialized.
> >> > Most
> >> > of the former members of this newsgroup fled to BROL where they could
> >> > be
> >> > properly chaperoned since that is a moderated forum. I heartily
> >> > approved
> >> > of this flight and can take some credit for causing it.
>
> >> > An unmoderated newsgroup (most of Usenet) is an abomination and there
> >> > is
> >> > not much good that can be said about it. It will draw all the scum bags
> >> > in
> >> > the universe, most of whom are barely literate. Before you know it,
> >> > everyone is telling everyone else to go **** themselves. Well, that is
> >> > Usenet for you.
>
> >> > Ed Dolan the Great will hang around for a bit longer to make sure that
> >> > the
> >> > nefarious Tom Sherman does not return to dominate this newsgroup with
> >> > his
> >> > traitorous liberalism. I would rather die than let that happen. As long
> >> > as
> >> > there is breath in my body, I can assure one and all that Tom Sherman
> >> > will
> >> > never have free reign on this newsgroup to say just any old stupid
> >> > thing
> >> > that pops into his head.
>
> >> > Regards,
>
> >> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> > aka
> >> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
>
> >> My God ... I think Tom Sherman has really gone at last! Oh happy day! Now
> >> my
> >> heart can be light and rejoice in that the worst scoundrel ever to infest
> >> these newsgroups is truly gone. I say worst scoundrel because he was also
> >> intelligent. A dumb scoundrel is no threat to anyone (except to Jim
> >> McNamara
> >> of course).
>
> >> These newsgroups will have arrived at perfection when it is just Ed Dolan
> >> the Great commiserating with Himself. Yea, He is a universe unto Himself
> >> and
> >> does not need or want any others polluting these sacred precincts.
>
> > A single word best describes your pugnacious prolixity on ARBR ...
> > CONTAMINANT!!!
>
> >> My Greatness demands solitary grandeur. The rest of you can skedaddle the
> >> same
> >> as Tom Sherman.
>
> > You've obviously been a jerk your entire life. Why don't you take a
> > day off?
>
> All you ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up here
> like a bad penny. It is fun to do this. I urge the rest of you to do this
> too and then you can have your own personal stalker just like I do. The name
> is 'Jim McNamara'. You can never be Great like I am unless you have your own
> personal stalker.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
You know what is even funnier? In my reply, almost wrote ... All you
ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up here
like a bad penny ... WORD FOR WORD! You have indeed become
predictably boring.
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 12:18 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:de48b024-e49d-4f69-9159-58ca92432c7f@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 14, 7:42 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
[...]
>> All you ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up here
>> like a bad penny. It is fun to do this. I urge the rest of you to do this
>> too and then you can have your own personal stalker just like I do. The
>> name
>> is 'Jim McNamara'. You can never be Great like I am unless you have your
>> own
>> personal stalker.
>
> You know what is even funnier? In my reply, almost wrote ... All you
> ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up here
> like a bad penny ... WORD FOR WORD! You have indeed become
> predictably boring.
'Almost' doesn't count.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:18 PM
On Jun 14, 10:00 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:de48b024-e49d-4f69-9159-58ca92432c7f@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jun 14, 7:42 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
> >> All you ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up here
> >> like a bad penny. It is fun to do this. I urge the rest of you to do this
> >> too and then you can have your own personal stalker just like I do. The
> >> name
> >> is 'Jim McNamara'. You can never be Great like I am unless you have your
> >> own
> >> personal stalker.
>
> > You know what is even funnier? In my reply, almost wrote ... All you
> > ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up here
> > like a bad penny ... WORD FOR WORD! You have indeed become
> > predictably boring.
>
> 'Almost' doesn't count.
Whatever ... BUT I thought it and predictably you followed through
exactly as I thought you would ... YAWN!!! By the way, who you going
to stalk now that Tom Sherman is gone. You do realize that you bait
and stalk him don't you? I'm sure Tom does and I'm sure the
readership realizes this too. Queen of Denial, there is no reason for
you to reply with a rebuttal since denial will in no way change
reality.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 12:24 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7c137eeb-159f-4d9f-beea-e09d0679a87c@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 14, 10:00 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:de48b024-e49d-4f69-9159-58ca92432c7f@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Jun 14, 7:42 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> All you ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up
>> >> here
>> >> like a bad penny. It is fun to do this. I urge the rest of you to do
>> >> this
>> >> too and then you can have your own personal stalker just like I do.
>> >> The
>> >> name
>> >> is 'Jim McNamara'. You can never be Great like I am unless you have
>> >> your
>> >> own
>> >> personal stalker.
>>
>> > You know what is even funnier? In my reply, almost wrote ... All you
>> > ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up here
>> > like a bad penny ... WORD FOR WORD! You have indeed become
>> > predictably boring.
>>
>> 'Almost' doesn't count.
>
> Whatever ... BUT I thought it and predictably you followed through
> exactly as I thought you would ... YAWN!!! By the way, who you going
> to stalk now that Tom Sherman is gone. You do realize that you bait
> and stalk him don't you?
JimmyMac knows all about stalking. It is the one and only thing he ever does
on Usenet.
I'm sure Tom does and I'm sure the
> readership realizes this too. Queen of Denial, there is no reason for
> you to reply with a rebuttal since denial will in no way change
> reality.
Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me. But we now
have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group. All they will ever
get from me is boilerplate name calling. I have wised up considerably since
the days of Ed Gin.
This new group of trolls will prove once and for all how worthless Usenet
is. Most ARBR members (what is left of them) are naifs and simply don't know
any better. Now they will learn the hard way. Anyone with any brains has
long since left Usenet. The Great Ed Dolan only remains to see how low it
can sink.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:24 PM
On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7c137eeb-159f-4d9f-beea-e09d0679a87c@34g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jun 14, 10:00 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:de48b024-e49d-4f69-9159-58ca92432c7f@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Jun 14, 7:42 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> All you ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up
> >> >> here
> >> >> like a bad penny. It is fun to do this. I urge the rest of you to do
> >> >> this
> >> >> too and then you can have your own personal stalker just like I do.
> >> >> The
> >> >> name
> >> >> is 'Jim McNamara'. You can never be Great like I am unless you have
> >> >> your
> >> >> own
> >> >> personal stalker.
>
> >> > You know what is even funnier? In my reply, almost wrote ... All you
> >> > ever have to do is just mention his name and he will show up here
> >> > like a bad penny ... WORD FOR WORD! You have indeed become
> >> > predictably boring.
>
> >> 'Almost' doesn't count.
>
> > Whatever ... BUT I thought it and predictably you followed through
> > exactly as I thought you would ... YAWN!!! By the way, who you going
> > to stalk now that Tom Sherman is gone. You do realize that you bait
> > and stalk him don't you?
>
> JimmyMac knows all about stalking. It is the one and only thing he ever does
> on Usenet.
>
> I'm sure Tom does and I'm sure the
>
> > readership realizes this too. Queen of Denial, there is no reason for
> > you to reply with a rebuttal since denial will in no way change
> > reality.
>
> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me. But we now
> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
> All they will ever
> get from me is boilerplate name calling. I have wised up considerably since
> the days of Ed Gin.
>
> This new group of trolls will prove once and for all how worthless Usenet
> is. Most ARBR members (what is left of them) are naifs and simply don't know
> any better. Now they will learn the hard way. Anyone with any brains has
> long since left Usenet. The Great Ed Dolan only remains to see how low it
> can sink.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 12:28 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:05431773-d388-47ce-a488-f43b01ac637a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
[...]
>> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me. But we
>> now
>> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
>
> So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
If you can't recognize the difference between a message from the kooks group
and one from One so Great as Myself, then you are truly a lost cause. You
and Ed Gin deserved one another - you a whiner and a stalker and he a
criminal vandal troll. A match made in Heaven!
>> All they will ever
>> get from me is boilerplate name calling. I have wised up considerably
>> since
>> the days of Ed Gin.
>>
>> This new group of trolls will prove once and for all how worthless Usenet
>> is. Most ARBR members (what is left of them) are naifs and simply don't
>> know
>> any better. Now they will learn the hard way. Anyone with any brains has
>> long since left Usenet. The Great Ed Dolan only remains to see how low it
>> can sink.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:28 PM
On Jun 17, 2:53 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:05431773-d388-47ce-a488-f43b01ac637a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
> >> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me. But we
> >> now
> >> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
>
> > So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
>
> If you can't recognize the difference between a message from the kooks group
> and one from One so Great as Myself, then you are truly a lost cause. You
> and Ed Gin deserved one another - you a whiner and a stalker and he a
> criminal vandal troll. A match made in Heaven!
Pot calling the kettle black, Ed? You are both a a stalker and a
troll! Just how is one to recognize the difference in messages when
your postings and those from the "kooks group" are virtual mirror
images? At least "the kooks" have the common decency not to deny what
and who they are. In that sense, they score much better on the
objectivity meter. I hope you are enjoying a dose of your own
medicine. Kooks deserve one another, speaking of matches made in
heaven.
> >> All they will ever
> >> get from me is boilerplate name calling. I have wised up considerably
> >> since
> >> the days of Ed Gin.
>
> >> This new group of trolls will prove once and for all how worthless Usenet
> >> is. Most ARBR members (what is left of them) are naifs and simply don't
> >> know
> >> any better. Now they will learn the hard way. Anyone with any brains has
> >> long since left Usenet. The Great Ed Dolan only remains to see how low it
> >> can sink.
>
> >> Regards,
>
> >> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> >> aka
> >> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 12:31 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0bfbe6f5-cbf2-4691-9306-ae0b936b6536@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 17, 2:53 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:05431773-d388-47ce-a488-f43b01ac637a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> [...]
>> >> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me. But
>> >> we
>> >> now
>> >> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
>>
>> > So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
>>
>> If you can't recognize the difference between a message from the kooks
>> group
>> and one from One so Great as Myself, then you are truly a lost cause. You
>> and Ed Gin deserved one another - you a whiner and a stalker and he a
>> criminal vandal troll. A match made in Heaven!
>
> Pot calling the kettle black, Ed? You are both a a stalker and a
> troll! Just how is one to recognize the difference in messages when
> your postings and those from the "kooks group" are virtual mirror
> images? At least "the kooks" have the common decency not to deny what
> and who they are. In that sense, they score much better on the
> objectivity meter. I hope you are enjoying a dose of your own
> medicine. Kooks deserve one another, speaking of matches made in
> heaven.
JimmyMac is a stalker, but not a troll any more than I am. The assholes from
the kooks group are all trolls as far as I can tell. Ed Dolan the Great is
NOT a troll. He never has been and he never will be. Why? Because he does
not have the required stupidity for it.
Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said. Trolls
could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to disrupt
and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one because he
forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single handedly
some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to what is
being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a rational
level.
[...]
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:32 PM
On Jun 18, 10:37 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0bfbe6f5-cbf2-4691-9306-ae0b936b6536@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jun 17, 2:53 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:05431773-d388-47ce-a488-f43b01ac637a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> >> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me. But
> >> >> we
> >> >> now
> >> >> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
>
> >> > So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
>
> >> If you can't recognize the difference between a message from the kooks
> >> group
> >> and one from One so Great as Myself, then you are truly a lost cause. You
> >> and Ed Gin deserved one another - you a whiner and a stalker and he a
> >> criminal vandal troll. A match made in Heaven!
>
> > Pot calling the kettle black, Ed? You are both a a stalker and a
> > troll! Just how is one to recognize the difference in messages when
> > your postings and those from the "kooks group" are virtual mirror
> > images? At least "the kooks" have the common decency not to deny what
> > and who they are. In that sense, they score much better on the
> > objectivity meter. I hope you are enjoying a dose of your own
> > medicine. Kooks deserve one another, speaking of matches made in
> > heaven.
>
> JimmyMac is a stalker, but not a troll any more than I am. The assholes from
> the kooks group are all trolls as far as I can tell. Ed Dolan the Great is
> NOT a troll. He never has been and he never will be. Why? Because he does
> not have the required stupidity for it.
I never said I was a troll. I said you were a troll and a stalker and
you are. You have stalked Tom Sherman for years. As concerns not
being a troll, you have several times admitted to being a troll though
you have often qualified that by stating that you were a "good
troll" ... an oxymoron, of course.
> Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said. Trolls
> could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to disrupt
> and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one because he
> forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single handedly
> some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to what is
> being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a rational
> level.
So then, you are a responsive troll. Thanks for clearing that up.
> [...]
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 12:37 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:87ddbdc7-eb06-4bb9-8c98-f3e9301f5de6@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 18, 10:37 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:0bfbe6f5-cbf2-4691-9306-ae0b936b6536@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jun 17, 2:53 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:05431773-d388-47ce-a488-f43b01ac637a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> >> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me.
>> >> >> But
>> >> >> we
>> >> >> now
>> >> >> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
>>
>> >> > So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
>>
>> >> If you can't recognize the difference between a message from the kooks
>> >> group
>> >> and one from One so Great as Myself, then you are truly a lost cause.
>> >> You
>> >> and Ed Gin deserved one another - you a whiner and a stalker and he a
>> >> criminal vandal troll. A match made in Heaven!
>>
>> > Pot calling the kettle black, Ed? You are both a a stalker and a
>> > troll! Just how is one to recognize the difference in messages when
>> > your postings and those from the "kooks group" are virtual mirror
>> > images? At least "the kooks" have the common decency not to deny what
>> > and who they are. In that sense, they score much better on the
>> > objectivity meter. I hope you are enjoying a dose of your own
>> > medicine. Kooks deserve one another, speaking of matches made in
>> > heaven.
>>
>> JimmyMac is a stalker, but not a troll any more than I am. The assholes
>> from
>> the kooks group are all trolls as far as I can tell. Ed Dolan the Great
>> is
>> NOT a troll. He never has been and he never will be. Why? Because he does
>> not have the required stupidity for it.
>
> I never said I was a troll. I said you were a troll and a stalker and
> you are. You have stalked Tom Sherman for years. As concerns not
> being a troll, you have several times admitted to being a troll though
> you have often qualified that by stating that you were a "good
> troll" ... an oxymoron, of course.
I am telling you what you are. You are a stalker - period! Only ****ed-up
wretches can be stalkers. Tom Sherman and I dueled as equals. As much as I
disliked his political opinions (he was a liberal ideologue), I at least
respected him. That is more than I can say for you. A stalker is even lower
than a troll.
>> Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said.
>> Trolls
>> could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to disrupt
>> and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one because he
>> forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single handedly
>> some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to what is
>> being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a rational
>> level.
>
> So then, you are a responsive troll. Thanks for clearing that up.
Read the above paragraph a dozen times until it soaks into your addled
brain. Not all trolls are created equal. A good troll is NOT a troll. A
RESPONSIVE troll is NOT a troll. Jeez ... what an idiot you are!
Ed Gin was a troll and a criminal one to boot (he forged names and
addresses). The kooks group are trolls. None of them are responsive nor are
they good. They mean to disrupt and to destroy. That is what trolls do.
Usenet is the pits because there is no way to prevent any of this. All
newsgroups must have a moderator that will edit (censor) what gets said.
There is no other way.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:37 PM
On Jun 19, 2:14 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:87ddbdc7-eb06-4bb9-8c98-f3e9301f5de6@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jun 18, 10:37 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:0bfbe6f5-cbf2-4691-9306-ae0b936b6536@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Jun 17, 2:53 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:05431773-d388-47ce-a488-f43b01ac637a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> > On Jun 16, 2:55 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> >> [...]
> >> >> >> Tom Sherman deserved every kick in the butt he ever got from me.
> >> >> >> But
> >> >> >> we
> >> >> >> now
> >> >> >> have some new trolls here on ARBR from the kooks group.
>
> >> >> > So, you've got company then ... or would that be rivals???
>
> >> >> If you can't recognize the difference between a message from the kooks
> >> >> group
> >> >> and one from One so Great as Myself, then you are truly a lost cause.
> >> >> You
> >> >> and Ed Gin deserved one another - you a whiner and a stalker and he a
> >> >> criminal vandal troll. A match made in Heaven!
>
> >> > Pot calling the kettle black, Ed? You are both a a stalker and a
> >> > troll! Just how is one to recognize the difference in messages when
> >> > your postings and those from the "kooks group" are virtual mirror
> >> > images? At least "the kooks" have the common decency not to deny what
> >> > and who they are. In that sense, they score much better on the
> >> > objectivity meter. I hope you are enjoying a dose of your own
> >> > medicine. Kooks deserve one another, speaking of matches made in
> >> > heaven.
>
> >> JimmyMac is a stalker, but not a troll any more than I am. The assholes
> >> from
> >> the kooks group are all trolls as far as I can tell. Ed Dolan the Great
> >> is
> >> NOT a troll. He never has been and he never will be. Why? Because he does
> >> not have the required stupidity for it.
>
> > I never said I was a troll. I said you were a troll and a stalker and
> > you are. You have stalked Tom Sherman for years. As concerns not
> > being a troll, you have several times admitted to being a troll though
> > you have often qualified that by stating that you were a "good
> > troll" ... an oxymoron, of course.
>
> I am telling you what you are. You are a stalker - period! Only ****ed-up
> wretches can be stalkers.
And tit for tat, I'm telling you what you are ... a Tom Sherman
stalker. Care to take a poll?
> Tom Sherman and I dueled as equals. As much as I
> disliked his political opinions (he was a liberal ideologue), I at least
> respected him. That is more than I can say for you. A stalker is even lower
> than a troll.
Trust me I have the same lack of respect for you.
> >> Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said.
> >> Trolls
> >> could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to disrupt
> >> and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one because he
> >> forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single handedly
> >> some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to what is
> >> being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a rational
> >> level.
>
> > So then, you are a responsive troll. Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> Read the above paragraph a dozen times until it soaks into your addled
> brain. Not all trolls are created equal. A good troll is NOT a troll. A
> RESPONSIVE troll is NOT a troll. Jeez ... what an idiot you are!
Read what you wrote a dozen times ... "A good troll is NOT a troll",
and ty to make sense of it. Conan the Librarian, GOOO is merely an
adjective and in this particular context an inappropriate one. There
is no such thing as a GOOD troll. Remove the adjective, and the
sentence would read ... "A troll is not a troll ... DUh!!! Now go
back and read what I wrote again and substitute the word RESPONSIVE
for GOOD, since the same applies. Can you be any more dense???
> Ed Gin was a troll and a criminal one to boot (he forged names and
> addresses). The kooks group are trolls. None of them are responsive nor are
> they good. They mean to disrupt and to destroy.
What is completely laughable is that you don't consider yourself to be
disruptive or a troll. What a hoot. So much for insight and
objectivity!!!
> That is what trolls do.
> Usenet is the pits because there is no way to prevent any of this. All
> newsgroups must have a moderator that will edit (censor) what gets said.
> There is no other way.
If there were a moderator here, you'd be one of the bery first to be
show the door.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 12:41 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2fb20324-fcd7-4716-8cd0-2d457b6382f7@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 19, 2:14 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
[...]
>> I am telling you what you are. You are a stalker - period! Only ****ed-up
>> wretches can be stalkers.
>
> And tit for tat, I'm telling you what you are ... a Tom Sherman
> stalker. Care to take a poll?
Who is there to poll? Ed Gin and you destroyed this newsgroup (ARBR) some
years ago with your childish feud. Even Tom Sherman has left the group
because of you. He was embarrassed by your stalking of One so Great as
Myself and couldn't take it anymore.
[...]
>> >> Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said.
>> >> Trolls
>> >> could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to
>> >> disrupt
>> >> and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one because
>> >> he
>> >> forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single
>> >> handedly
>> >> some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to what
>> >> is
>> >> being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a
>> >> rational
>> >> level.
>>
>> > So then, you are a responsive troll. Thanks for clearing that up.
>>
>> Read the above paragraph a dozen times until it soaks into your addled
>> brain. Not all trolls are created equal. A good troll is NOT a troll. A
>> RESPONSIVE troll is NOT a troll. Jeez ... what an idiot you are!
>
> Read what you wrote a dozen times ... "A good troll is NOT a troll",
> and ty to make sense of it. Conan the Librarian, GOOO is merely an
> adjective and in this particular context an inappropriate one. There
> is no such thing as a GOOD troll. Remove the adjective, and the
> sentence would read ... "A troll is not a troll ... DUh!!! Now go
> back and read what I wrote again and substitute the word RESPONSIVE
> for GOOD, since the same applies. Can you be any more dense???
A good troll creates conversation that would otherwise not exist. Ed Dolan
the Great is the 'goodest' troll that has ever been. It is a high honor and
a privilege to be in His presence. If He should deign to address you,
consider yourself truly blessed by the gods.
[...]
> If there were a moderator here, you'd be one of the very first to be
> shown the door.
Nope, I would simply be a bit more careful what I say and how I say it. But
since there are no moderators on these newsgroups connected with Usenet, it
does not matter what is said or how it is said provided you do not stoop to
ultimate stupidity or criminality like Ed Gin did. He was a criminal vandal
troll and you made it possible by remonstrating with him. You are culpable
to that extent for having destroyed ARBR as a viable newsgroup.
Ed Gin and JimmyMac destroyed ARBR some years ago. Cowards like Tom Sherman,
Jon Meinecke and Peter Clinch stood by and let it happen. Only Ed Dolan the
Great acted honorably and indeed heroically and fought the good fight. But
it is easy to destroy a small newsgroup and not so easy to build it up. Ed
Dolan the Great now wishes only to see ARBR dead and buried. The group was
way too cowardly to deserve to live.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:42 PM
On Jun 20, 1:51 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2fb20324-fcd7-4716-8cd0-2d457b6382f7@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jun 19, 2:14 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
> >> I am telling you what you are. You are a stalker - period! Only ****ed-up
> >> wretches can be stalkers.
>
> > And tit for tat, I'm telling you what you are ... a Tom Sherman
> > stalker. Care to take a poll?
>
> Who is there to poll? Ed Gin and you destroyed this newsgroup (ARBR) some
> years ago with your childish feud. Even Tom Sherman has left the group
> because of you. He was embarrassed by your stalking of One so Great as
> Myself and couldn't take it anymore.
> [...]
>
>
>
> >> >> Both JimmyMac and Ed Dolan are responsive to whatever is being said.
> >> >> Trolls
> >> >> could care less about what is being said. Their only intent is to
> >> >> disrupt
> >> >> and destroy. Ed Gin was an example of a troll (a criminal one because
> >> >> he
> >> >> forged addresses and names) and he in fact destroyed ARBR single
> >> >> handedly
> >> >> some years ago. The key to not being a troll is responsiveness to what
> >> >> is
> >> >> being said. As long as you are doing that you are engaging on a
> >> >> rational
> >> >> level.
>
> >> > So then, you are a responsive troll. Thanks for clearing that up.
>
> >> Read the above paragraph a dozen times until it soaks into your addled
> >> brain. Not all trolls are created equal. A good troll is NOT a troll. A
> >> RESPONSIVE troll is NOT a troll. Jeez ... what an idiot you are!
>
> > Read what you wrote a dozen times ... "A good troll is NOT a troll",
> > and ty to make sense of it. Conan the Librarian, GOOD is merely an
> > adjective and in this particular context an inappropriate one. There
> > is no such thing as a GOOD troll. Remove the adjective, and the
> > sentence would read ... "A troll is not a troll ... DUh!!! Now go
> > back and read what I wrote again and substitute the word RESPONSIVE
> > for GOOD, since the same applies. Can you be any more dense???
>
> A good troll creates conversation that would otherwise not exist.
No troll is good. Good troll is an oxymoron and your instance is an
indication that you are a moron. A troll is a troll is a troll, and
there is nothing good about a troll. I used to think you were an
egomaniac, but I've changed my mind. You're a megalomaniac!
> Ed Dolan
> the Great is the 'goodest' troll that has ever been. It is a high honor and
> a privilege to be in His presence. If He should deign to address you,
> consider yourself truly blessed by the gods.
> [...]
Delusion must be such a comfort.
> > If there were a moderator here, you'd be one of the very first to be
> > shown the door.
>
> Nope, I would simply be a bit more careful what I say and how I say it. But
> since there are no moderators on these newsgroups connected with Usenet, it
> does not matter what is said or how it is said provided you do not stoop to
> ultimate stupidity or criminality like Ed Gin did. He was a criminal vandal
> troll and you made it possible by remonstrating with him. You are culpable
> to that extent for having destroyed ARBR as a viable newsgroup.
This opinionated nonsense stated as though factual has already been
regurgitated countless times. Your contention is no more valid or
true than it was with its initial utterance. ****can your fallacious,
meaningless cut and paste boilerplate. Get some new material why
don't you. Your material is about as old as you are. You are boring
the readership to death with your crap.
> Ed Gin and JimmyMac destroyed ARBR some years ago. Cowards like Tom Sherman,
> Jon Meinecke and Peter Clinch stood by and let it happen. Only Ed Dolan the
> Great acted honorably and indeed heroically and fought the good fight. But
> it is easy to destroy a small newsgroup and not so easy to build it up. Ed
> Dolan the Great now wishes only to see ARBR dead and buried. The group was
> way too cowardly to deserve to live.
When I remonstrated (opposed, denounced criticized, protested,
argued), that was fighting the good fight and remonstrating is exactly
what Ed Dolan you did as well. Perhaps Connan the Librarian just
does't know the definition of the word and considers it to be an
insult. Go figure. Regardless Ed Dolan insists in living in the
past. Ed Gin is long gone and yet Dolan continues to harp about
something that is now so far in the past as to be considered ancient
history. Dolan just cannot let things go and move on. He needs to
speak with his therapist about this. Regardless Ed,we've all read
this repetitious bull**** of yours many times before. Give it up
clown. No one is buying your gibberish and you are only making
yourself look foolish.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 12:49 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5e8593d6-7237-431d-9bbb-9c3b9e2ff70c@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> No troll is good. Good troll is an oxymoron and your instance is an
> indication that you are a moron. A troll is a troll is a troll, and
> there is nothing good about a troll. I used to think you were an
> egomaniac, but I've changed my mind. You're a megalomaniac!
You define 'troll' your way and I'll define it my way.
[...]
> When I remonstrated (opposed, denounced criticized, protested,
> argued), that was fighting the good fight and remonstrating is exactly
> what Ed Dolan you did as well. Perhaps Connan the Librarian just
> does't know the definition of the word and considers it to be an
> insult. Go figure.
When someone is telling you to go **** yourself, it is a no brainer to say
it right back. Once a discussion has descended to name calling, only a naïf
would engage on any other level. All I ever did was was to tell Ed Gin to go
**** himself. That is what you should have done too.
Regardless Ed Dolan insists in living in the
> past. Ed Gin is long gone and yet Dolan continues to harp about
> something that is now so far in the past as to be considered ancient
> history. Dolan just cannot let things go and move on. He needs to
> speak with his therapist about this. Regardless Ed,we've all read
> this repetitious bull**** of yours many times before. Give it up
> clown. No one is buying your gibberish and you are only making
> yourself look foolish.
Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll who forged names and addresses and who,
along with JimmyMac, destroyed ARBR. But I mainly blame all the regular
members of the group who were too cowardly to take on the criminal vandal
troll. He could have been put in his place easily if everyone had joined in
instead of running for the tall grass.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:50 PM
On Jun 21, 9:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:5e8593d6-7237-431d-9bbb-9c3b9e2ff70c@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> [...]
>
> > No troll is good. Good troll is an oxymoron and your instance is an
> > indication that you are a moron. A troll is a troll is a troll, and
> > there is nothing good about a troll. I used to think you were an
> > egomaniac, but I've changed my mind. You're a megalomaniac!
>
> You define 'troll' your way and I'll define it my way.
> [...]
I don't define a troll. I merely accept the commonly recognized
definition of what a troll is. Defining a troll your way does not
change what constitutes a troll. A troll is what it is regardless of
your distorted conceptualization.
> > When I remonstrated (opposed, denounced criticized, protested,
> > argued), that was fighting the good fight and remonstrating is exactly
> > what Ed Dolan you did as well. Perhaps Connan the Librarian just
> > does't know the definition of the word and considers it to be an
> > insult. Go figure.
>
> When someone is telling you to go **** yourself, it is a no brainer to say
> it right back. Once a discussion has descended to name calling, only a naïf
> would engage on any other level. All I ever did was was to tell Ed Gin to go
> **** himself. That is what you should have done too.
You remonstrated just as I did no matter what spin you vainly attempt
to put on things. Name calling is NOT "fighting the good fight".
Furthermore, need I remind you in your own words ..."Name calling is
just so infantile that I hate to do it even in retaliation."
> Regardless Ed Dolan insists in living in the
>
> > past. Ed Gin is long gone and yet Dolan continues to harp about
> > something that is now so far in the past as to be considered ancient
> > history. Dolan just cannot let things go and move on. He needs to
> > speak with his therapist about this. Regardless Ed,we've all read
> > this repetitious bull**** of yours many times before. Give it up
> > clown. No one is buying your gibberish and you are only making
> > yourself look foolish.
>
> Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll who forged names and addresses and who,
> along with JimmyMac, destroyed ARBR. But I mainly blame all the regular
> members of the group who were too cowardly to take on the criminal vandal
> troll. He could have been put in his place easily if everyone had joined in
> instead of running for the tall grass.
Regurgitated ancient history that Dolan is unable to free himself ...
forever stuck in a yesteryear quagmire that no one except Dolan
remains interested in.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 12:59 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f18a1f87-5cb9-4e5b-b144-952870d7d422@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 21, 9:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:5e8593d6-7237-431d-9bbb-9c3b9e2ff70c@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> [...]
>
> > No troll is good. Good troll is an oxymoron and your instance is an
> > indication that you are a moron. A troll is a troll is a troll, and
> > there is nothing good about a troll. I used to think you were an
> > egomaniac, but I've changed my mind. You're a megalomaniac!
>
> You define 'troll' your way and I'll define it my way.
> [...]
>>>I don't define a troll. I merely accept the commonly recognized
definition of what a troll is. Defining a troll your way does not
change what constitutes a troll. A troll is what it is regardless of
your distorted conceptualization.
There is no commonly recognized definition of what a troll is. It is
whatever someone says it is. It is more name calling than anything else.
> > When I remonstrated (opposed, denounced criticized, protested,
> > argued), that was fighting the good fight and remonstrating is exactly
> > what Ed Dolan you did as well. Perhaps Connan the Librarian just
> > does't know the definition of the word and considers it to be an
> > insult. Go figure.
>
> When someone is telling you to go **** yourself, it is a no brainer to say
> it right back. Once a discussion has descended to name calling, only a
> naïf
> would engage on any other level. All I ever did was was to tell Ed Gin to
> go
> **** himself. That is what you should have done too.
>>>You remonstrated just as I did no matter what spin you vainly attempt
to put on things. Name calling is NOT "fighting the good fight".
Furthermore, need I remind you in your own words ..."Name calling is
just so infantile that I hate to do it even in retaliation."
That should be the rule, but when confronted with the Devil you have to deal
on the Devil's terms. Any other way and you are defeated.
> Regardless Ed Dolan insists in living in the
>
> > past. Ed Gin is long gone and yet Dolan continues to harp about
> > something that is now so far in the past as to be considered ancient
> > history. Dolan just cannot let things go and move on. He needs to
> > speak with his therapist about this. Regardless Ed,we've all read
> > this repetitious bull**** of yours many times before. Give it up
> > clown. No one is buying your gibberish and you are only making
> > yourself look foolish.
>
> Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll who forged names and addresses and who,
> along with JimmyMac, destroyed ARBR. But I mainly blame all the regular
> members of the group who were too cowardly to take on the criminal vandal
> troll. He could have been put in his place easily if everyone had joined
> in
> instead of running for the tall grass.
>>>Regurgitated ancient history that Dolan is unable to free himself ...
forever stuck in a yesteryear quagmire that no one except Dolan
remains interested in.
We need to be constantly reminded of the past lest we repeat it.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 12:59 PM
On Jun 23, 4:43 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f18a1f87-5cb9-4e5b-b144-952870d7d422@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 21, 9:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>
> > "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:5e8593d6-7237-431d-9bbb-9c3b9e2ff70c@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> > [...]
>
> > > No troll is good. Good troll is an oxymoron and your instance is an
> > > indication that you are a moron. A troll is a troll is a troll, and
> > > there is nothing good about a troll. I used to think you were an
> > > egomaniac, but I've changed my mind. You're a megalomaniac!
>
> > You define 'troll' your way and I'll define it my way.
> > [...]
> >>>I don't define a troll. I merely accept the commonly recognized
>
> definition of what a troll is. Defining a troll your way does not
> change what constitutes a troll. A troll is what it is regardless of
> your distorted conceptualization.
>
> There is no commonly recognized definition of what a troll is. It is
> whatever someone says it is. It is more name calling than anything else.
Nonsense ... th usual errant opinion stated as fact. Why am I not the
least bit surprised. There is of course what the majority of sensible
folk acknowledge as commonly recognized characteristics that comprise
the definition of a troll and you fit the definition, so naturally
there is your twisted opposinng definition which you employ in order
not to fit the commonly recognized definition ... how very convenient.
> > > When I remonstrated (opposed, denounced criticized, protested,
> > > argued), that was fighting the good fight and remonstrating is exactly
> > > what Ed Dolan you did as well. Perhaps Connan the Librarian just
> > > does't know the definition of the word and considers it to be an
> > > insult. Go figure.
>
> > When someone is telling you to go **** yourself, it is a no brainer to say
> > it right back. Once a discussion has descended to name calling, only a
> > naïf
> > would engage on any other level. All I ever did was was to tell Ed Gin to
> > go
> > **** himself. That is what you should have done too.
>You remonstrated just as I did no matter what spin you vainly attempt
> to put on things. Name calling is NOT "fighting the good fight".
> Furthermore, need I remind you in your own words ..."Name calling is
> just so infantile that I hate to do it even in retaliation."
>
> That should be the rule, but when confronted with the Devil you have to deal
> on the Devil's terms. Any other way and you are defeated.
Well it's your rule, so I guess you feel entitled to break it. You
follow no rules, not even your own ... how telling.
> > > Regardless Ed Dolan insists in living in the
> > > past. Ed Gin is long gone and yet Dolan continues to harp about
> > > something that is now so far in the past as to be considered ancient
> > > history. Dolan just cannot let things go and move on. He needs to
> > > speak with his therapist about this. Regardless Ed,we've all read
> > > this repetitious bull**** of yours many times before. Give it up
> > > clown. No one is buying your gibberish and you are only making
> > > yourself look foolish.
>
> > Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll who forged names and addresses and who,
> > along with JimmyMac, destroyed ARBR. But I mainly blame all the regular
> > members of the group who were too cowardly to take on the criminal vandal
> > troll. He could have been put in his place easily if everyone had joined
> > in instead of running for the tall grass
> Regurgitated ancient history from which Dolan is unable to free himself ....
> forever stuck in a yesteryear quagmire that no one except Dolan
> remains interested in.
>
> > We need to be constantly reminded of the past lest we repeat it.
No we don't. We've been reminded more than enough. Tme to move on.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 01:12 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e79230da-9a6e-4b86-8e9e-292f75ca51d3@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 23, 4:43 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
[...]
> That should be the rule, but when confronted with the Devil you have to
> deal
> on the Devil's terms. Any other way and you are defeated.
Well it's your rule, so I guess you feel entitled to break it. You
follow no rules, not even your own ... how telling.
Ed Gin made you look like the fool that you are. That is because you played
into his hands. His game, his rules and you were dopey enough to play on his
terms. Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll. Ed Dolan is not only Great, but a
Great Saint known far and wide as Saint Edward the Great.
> > > Regardless Ed Dolan insists in living in the
> > > past. Ed Gin is long gone and yet Dolan continues to harp about
> > > something that is now so far in the past as to be considered ancient
> > > history. Dolan just cannot let things go and move on. He needs to
> > > speak with his therapist about this. Regardless Ed,we've all read
> > > this repetitious bull**** of yours many times before. Give it up
> > > clown. No one is buying your gibberish and you are only making
> > > yourself look foolish.
>
> > Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll who forged names and addresses and
> > who,
> > along with JimmyMac, destroyed ARBR. But I mainly blame all the regular
> > members of the group who were too cowardly to take on the criminal
> > vandal
> > troll. He could have been put in his place easily if everyone had joined
> > in instead of running for the tall grass
> Regurgitated ancient history from which Dolan is unable to free himself
> ...
> forever stuck in a yesteryear quagmire that no one except Dolan
> remains interested in.
>
> > We need to be constantly reminded of the past lest we repeat it.
No we don't. We've been reminded more than enough. Time to move on.
"We need to be constantly reminded of the past lest we repeat it." - Ed
Dolan
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 01:12 PM
On Jun 26, 5:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:e79230da-9a6e-4b86-8e9e-292f75ca51d3@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 23, 4:43 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > That should be the rule, but when confronted with the Devil you have to
> > deal
> > on the Devil's terms. Any other way and you are defeated.
>
> Well it's your rule, so I guess you feel entitled to break it. You
> follow no rules, not even your own ... how telling.
>
> Ed Gin made you look like the fool that you are. That is because you played
> into his hands. His game, his rules and you were dopey enough to play on his
> terms. Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll. Ed Dolan is not only Great, but a
> Great Saint known far and wide as Saint Edward the Great.
Diversion duly noted, a common tactic employed by Ed Dolan. As
concerns the commentary ... that is errant opinion stated as fact ...
a bad habit of Mr. Dolan's that reflects poorly on his character.
Repeating a fallacious opinion over and over again ... hundreds, even
thousands of times makes the utterance no more valid or true with each
subsequent utterance. What Ed Dolan is known for far and wide is
being an obnoxious, delusional, egomaniac troll who is in need of both
a therapist and a trip to the wood shed. Ed Dolan wouldn't have the
testicular fortitude to step forth from him inherited dwelling and say
most of what he has said to readers on this newsgroup. If he did he'd
get a much need attitude adjustment. It is easy to be a bad ass form
behind a keyboard.
> > > > Regardless Ed Dolan insists in living in the
> > > > past. Ed Gin is long gone and yet Dolan continues to harp about
> > > > something that is now so far in the past as to be considered ancient
> > > > history. Dolan just cannot let things go and move on. He needs to
> > > > speak with his therapist about this. Regardless Ed,we've all read
> > > > this repetitious bull**** of yours many times before. Give it up
> > > > clown. No one is buying your gibberish and you are only making
> > > > yourself look foolish.
>
> > > Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll who forged names and addresses and
> > > who,
> > > along with JimmyMac, destroyed ARBR. But I mainly blame all the regular
> > > members of the group who were too cowardly to take on the criminal
> > > vandal
> > > troll. He could have been put in his place easily if everyone had joined
> > > in instead of running for the tall grass
> > Regurgitated ancient history from which Dolan is unable to free himself
> > ...
> > forever stuck in a yesteryear quagmire that no one except Dolan
> > remains interested in.
>
> > > We need to be constantly reminded of the past lest we repeat it.
>
> No we don't. We've been reminded more than enough. Time to move on.
>
> "We need to be constantly reminded of the past lest we repeat it." - Ed
> Dolan
No we don't. We've been reminded more than enough. Time to move on.
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 01:13 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d49211bf-411f-4dce-bd65-d4eac55b3424@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 26, 5:11 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:e79230da-9a6e-4b86-8e9e-292f75ca51d3@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jun 23, 4:43 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> > That should be the rule, but when confronted with the Devil you have to
>> > deal
>> > on the Devil's terms. Any other way and you are defeated.
>>
>> Well it's your rule, so I guess you feel entitled to break it. You
>> follow no rules, not even your own ... how telling.
>>
>> Ed Gin made you look like the fool that you are. That is because you
>> played
>> into his hands. His game, his rules and you were dopey enough to play on
>> his
>> terms. Ed Gin was a criminal vandal troll. Ed Dolan is not only Great,
>> but a
>> Great Saint known far and wide as Saint Edward the Great.
>
> Diversion duly noted, a common tactic employed by Ed Dolan. As
> concerns the commentary ... that is errant opinion stated as fact ...
> a bad habit of Mr. Dolan's that reflects poorly on his character.
> Repeating a fallacious opinion over and over again ... hundreds, even
> thousands of times makes the utterance no more valid or true with each
> subsequent utterance. What Ed Dolan is known for far and wide is
> being an obnoxious, delusional, egomaniac troll who is in need of both
> a therapist and a trip to the wood shed. Ed Dolan wouldn't have the
> testicular fortitude to step forth from him inherited dwelling and say
> most of what he has said to readers on this newsgroup. If he did he'd
> get a much need attitude adjustment. It is easy to be a bad ass form
> behind a keyboard.
Here is JimmyMac having another one of his childish tantrums. If he can't
stand the heat, why doesn't he get out of the kitchen? Does his wife know
what he is doing on Usenet? Does his poor old hound dog know what he is
doing on Usenet?
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
A Muzi
01-04-1970, 01:19 PM
> Edward Dolan wrote:
>> My God ... I think Tom Sherman has really gone at last![...]
Tom Sherman wrote:
> Who?
so, rumors of your demise may be exaggerated?
--
Andrew Muzi
<www.yellowjersey.org/>
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
Tom Sherman
01-04-1970, 01:19 PM
Andrew Muzi wrote:
>> Edw*rd D*l*n wrote:
>>> - Hide quoted text -
>
> Tom Sherman wrote:
>> Who?
>
> so, rumors of your demise may be exaggerated?
Sorry to disappoint some. ;)
--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 01:19 PM
"A Muzi" <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote in message
news:c717e$4866840a$1809@news.teranews.com...
>> Edward Dolan wrote:
>>> My God ... I think Tom Sherman has really gone at last![...]
>
> Tom Sherman wrote:
>> Who?
>
> so, rumors of your demise may be exaggerated?
Tom Sherman is actually quite brain dead and has been for years. He is like
a zombie. All that is required is that someone drive a wooden stake through
his heart. That is what I am here for.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Tim McNamara
01-04-1970, 01:20 PM
In article <g46bri$861$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:
> Tim McNamara wrote:
> > In article <g45oqo$ke3$3@registered.motzarella.org>,
> > Tom Sherman <sunsetss0003@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Edw*rd D*l*n wrote:
> >>> - Hide quoted text -
> >> Who?
> >
> > Please stop crossposting Ed Dolan's horse**** to r.b.t.
>
> Now, is that any way to denigrate horse ****?
Point taken. A road apple offers better conversation than does Edward
the Pathetic.
> N.B. Mr. Ed's contribution deleted, thereby complying with Mr.
> McNamara's request.
Much appreciated.
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 01:21 PM
On Jun 28, 7:45 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "Tom Sherman" <sunsetss0...@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:g45p16$lmi$1@registered.motzarella.org...
>
>
>
> > Edward Dolan wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>news:2fb20324-fcd7-4716-8cd0-2d457b6382f7@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >>> On Jun 19, 2:14 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>>> I am telling you what you are. You are a stalker - period! Only
> >>>> ****ed-up
> >>>> wretches can be stalkers.
> >>> And tit for tat, I'm telling you what you are ... a Tom Sherman
> >>> stalker. Care to take a poll?
>
> >> Who is there to poll? Ed Gin and you destroyed this newsgroup (ARBR) some
> >> years ago with your childish feud. Even Tom Sherman has left the group
> >> because of you. He was embarrassed by your stalking of One so Great as
> >> Myself and couldn't take it anymore.
> >> [...]
>
> > I was not aware of that.
>
> Of course not. I know you better than you know yourself. That is why I am so
> God Damn ****ing Great!
>
>
>
> >> [...]
> >> Nope, I would simply be a bit more careful what I say and how I say it.
> >> But since there are no moderators on these newsgroups connected with
> >> Usenet, it does not matter what is said or how it is said provided you do
> >> not stoop to ultimate stupidity or criminality like Ed Gin did. He was a
> >> criminal vandal troll and you made it possible by remonstrating with him.
> >> You are culpable to that extent for having destroyed ARBR as a viable
> >> newsgroup.
>
> >> Ed Gin and JimmyMac destroyed ARBR some years ago. Cowards like Tom
> >> Sherman, Jon Meinecke and Peter Clinch stood by and let it happen. Only
> >> Ed Dolan the Great acted honorably and indeed heroically and fought the
> >> good fight. But it is easy to destroy a small newsgroup and not so easy
> >> to build it up. Ed Dolan the Great now wishes only to see ARBR dead and
> >> buried. The group was way too cowardly to deserve to live.
>
> > Hint to Mr. Ed Dolan - Ed Gin was NOT Johnny NoCom.
>
> Who cares anymore at this point. They were all associated with one another.
> I will continue to use 'Ed Gin' as the generic for what destroyed this
> newsgroup. I harbor deep resentment against JimmyMac too for not taking my
> very good advice to tell all those ****ers to go **** themselves. Instead,
> he wanted to preach to them like a Baptist minister.
Ed Dolan really needs to get over this. A phrase I once heard uttered
by a young girl to her older brother comes to mind ... You are not the
boss of me. It is painfully obvious that Ed Dolan continues to harbor
deep resentment toward me merely because I refused to abide by his
unwelcome advice that was neither requested nor required. When an
irrational manipulative control freak like Ed Dolan fails to impose
his will on another, deep resentment is inevitable. For some peculiar
reason Ed Dolan contends that he knows what's best and consequently is
entitled to dictate mandates regarding how others should or should not
conduct themselves. Well, Ed Dolan is simply mistaken. Ed Dolan has
only himself to blame for his self-inflicted disappointment. The
bottom line is that Ed Dolan should harbor resentment toward himself
for exercise of poor judgment ... and, that's that on that. - Jim
McNamara
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 01:37 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3e0f1bb5-0cb1-4691-827e-6425118a4aae@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> Ed Dolan really needs to get over this. A phrase I once heard uttered
> by a young girl to her older brother comes to mind ... You are not the
> boss of me. It is painfully obvious that Ed Dolan continues to harbor
> deep resentment toward me merely because I refused to abide by his
> unwelcome advice that was neither requested nor required. When an
> irrational manipulative control freak like Ed Dolan fails to impose
> his will on another, deep resentment is inevitable. For some peculiar
> reason Ed Dolan contends that he knows what's best and consequently is
> entitled to dictate mandates regarding how others should or should not
> conduct themselves. Well, Ed Dolan is simply mistaken. Ed Dolan has
> only himself to blame for his self-inflicted disappointment. The
> bottom line is that Ed Dolan should harbor resentment toward himself
> for exercise of poor judgment ... and, that's that on that. - Jim
> McNamara
I never give a damn whether anyone takes my advice or not - as long as one
does not whine about it. I am this world's foremost expert at telling others
to go **** themselves. After all, I know everything and they don't!
You made a damn fool of yourself with Ed Gin on this newsgroup. The group
was destroyed because of you two fools. He was a criminal vandal troll and
you were a whining cry baby. If anyone thinks I am making this up, just go
back and read the Google archives for ARBR from several years ago.
Who do I blame the most? Not the two of you. After all, fools we will always
have with us. I blame the stalwarts of this newsgroup who stood by and did
nothing. Some of those stalwarts still have the nerve to continue to post to
this group. I am thinking of Tom Sherman, Jon Meinecke, and Peter Clinch
primarily. It was at that point that I decided this newsgroup was the pits
and it and everyone connected with it could go to Hell!
ARBR - RIP!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 01:38 PM
On Jul 2, 2:49 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3e0f1bb5-0cb1-4691-827e-6425118a4aae@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> [...]
>
> > Ed Dolan really needs to get over this. A phrase I once heard uttered
> > by a young girl to her older brother comes to mind ... You are not the
> > boss of me. It is painfully obvious that Ed Dolan continues to harbor
> > deep resentment toward me merely because I refused to abide by his
> > unwelcome advice that was neither requested nor required. When an
> > irrational manipulative control freak like Ed Dolan fails to impose
> > his will on another, deep resentment is inevitable. For some peculiar
> > reason Ed Dolan contends that he knows what's best and consequently is
> > entitled to dictate mandates regarding how others should or should not
> > conduct themselves. Well, Ed Dolan is simply mistaken. Ed Dolan has
> > only himself to blame for his self-inflicted disappointment. The
> > bottom line is that Ed Dolan should harbor resentment toward himself
> > for exercise of poor judgment ... and, that's that on that. - Jim
> > McNamara
>
> I never give a damn whether anyone takes my advice or not - as long as one
> does not whine about it.
I harbor deep resentment against JimmyMac too for not taking my very
good advice (your own words).
> I am this world's foremost expert at telling others
> to go **** themselves. After all, I know everything and they don't!
>
> You made a damn fool of yourself with Ed Gin on this newsgroup. The group
> was destroyed because of you two fools. He was a criminal vandal troll and
> you were a whining cry baby. If anyone thinks I am making this up, just go
> back and read the Google archives for ARBR from several years ago.
Same old ... same old often repeated errant opinion.
> Who do I blame the most? Not the two of you. After all, fools we will always
> have with us. I blame the stalwarts of this newsgroup who stood by and did
> nothing. Some of those stalwarts still have the nerve to continue to post to
> this group. I am thinking of Tom Sherman, Jon Meinecke, and Peter Clinch
> primarily. It was at that point that I decided this newsgroup was the pits
> and it and everyone connected with it could go to Hell!
Then you should have come to the obvious conclusion that it was time
to depart rather than to remain and rave on like a lunatic.
> ARBR - RIP!
>
> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
Edward Dolan
01-04-1970, 01:56 PM
"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fe09f2b3-81f3-4d10-abc3-7c94b1ef95b7@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 2, 2:49 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:3e0f1bb5-0cb1-4691-827e-6425118a4aae@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> [...]
>>
>> > Ed Dolan really needs to get over this. A phrase I once heard uttered
>> > by a young girl to her older brother comes to mind ... You are not the
>> > boss of me. It is painfully obvious that Ed Dolan continues to harbor
>> > deep resentment toward me merely because I refused to abide by his
>> > unwelcome advice that was neither requested nor required. When an
>> > irrational manipulative control freak like Ed Dolan fails to impose
>> > his will on another, deep resentment is inevitable. For some peculiar
>> > reason Ed Dolan contends that he knows what's best and consequently is
>> > entitled to dictate mandates regarding how others should or should not
>> > conduct themselves. Well, Ed Dolan is simply mistaken. Ed Dolan has
>> > only himself to blame for his self-inflicted disappointment. The
>> > bottom line is that Ed Dolan should harbor resentment toward himself
>> > for exercise of poor judgment ... and, that's that on that. - Jim
>> > McNamara
>>
>> I never give a damn whether anyone takes my advice or not - as long as
>> one
>> does not whine about it.
>
> I harbor deep resentment against JimmyMac too for not taking my very
> good advice (your own words).
It was OK not to take my advice; it was not OK to whine about it.
>> I am this world's foremost expert at telling others
>> to go **** themselves. After all, I know everything and they don't!
>>
>> You made a damn fool of yourself with Ed Gin on this newsgroup. The group
>> was destroyed because of you two fools. He was a criminal vandal troll
>> and
>> you were a whining cry baby. If anyone thinks I am making this up, just
>> go
>> back and read the Google archives for ARBR from several years ago.
>
> Same old ... same old often repeated errant opinion.
>
>> Who do I blame the most? Not the two of you. After all, fools we will
>> always
>> have with us. I blame the stalwarts of this newsgroup who stood by and
>> did
>> nothing. Some of those stalwarts still have the nerve to continue to post
>> to
>> this group. I am thinking of Tom Sherman, Jon Meinecke, and Peter Clinch
>> primarily. It was at that point that I decided this newsgroup was the
>> pits
>> and it and everyone connected with it could go to Hell!
>
> Then you should have come to the obvious conclusion that it was time
> to depart rather than to remain and rave on like a lunatic.
And leave the field of battle to the likes of Tom Sherman? Not a chance.
>> ARBR - RIP!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
>> aka
>> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
JimmyMac
01-04-1970, 01:58 PM
On Jul 6, 4:47 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fe09f2b3-81f3-4d10-abc3-7c94b1ef95b7@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Jul 2, 2:49 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> >> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:3e0f1bb5-0cb1-4691-827e-6425118a4aae@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >> [...]
>
> >> > Ed Dolan really needs to get over this. A phrase I once heard uttered
> >> > by a young girl to her older brother comes to mind ... You are not the
> >> > boss of me. It is painfully obvious that Ed Dolan continues to harbor
> >> > deep resentment toward me merely because I refused to abide by his
> >> > unwelcome advice that was neither requested nor required. When an
> >> > irrational manipulative control freak like Ed Dolan fails to impose
> >> > his will on another, deep resentment is inevitable. For some peculiar
> >> > reason Ed Dolan contends that he knows what's best and consequently is
> >> > entitled to dictate mandates regarding how others should or should not
> >> > conduct themselves. Well, Ed Dolan is simply mistaken. Ed Dolan has
> >> > only himself to blame for his self-inflicted disappointment. The
> >> > bottom line is that Ed Dolan should harbor resentment toward himself
> >> > for exercise of poor judgment ... and, that's that on that. - Jim
> >> > McNamara
>
> >> I never give a damn whether anyone takes my advice or not - as long as
> >> one
> >> does not whine about it.
>
> > I harbor deep resentment against JimmyMac too for not taking my very
> > good advice (your own words).
>
> It was OK not to take my advice; it was not OK to whine about it.
In direct response to your continued insistence upon force feeding me
advice OVER & OVER ... AGAIN & AGAIN, I informed you that your advice
was NOT requested, welcome or needed. That isn't whining. Had you
ceased when asked, instead of persisting, additional requests would
have been unnecessary. Stubborn blockhead that you are, you have only
yourself to blame for me having to repeat my request. Try as I may, I
failed to get you to cease. In frustration you wrote ... I have
removed your name from my address book. Any more communications from
you will be met by pure invective, at which I am much better than you.
But stay tuned to ARBR where I will have much to say about you, none
of it complementary. Those days are gone forever. You have ever proven
yourself an ******* with me. Congratulations! You have now made a
permanent enemy on ARBR. I will now cut you no more slack. With that
you ported this entire matter on over to ARBR where it is YOU who
continues to whine about this (Ed Gin, my not taking advice, and other
related peripheral past historical crap that no one really cares about
but you). You just don't get it and never will. Although I don't
value your advice, I will take your advice just this one time to
appease you ... to do as you suggest that I should in dealing with
someone such as yourself and just tell you to GO **** YOURSELF! Are
you happy now?
> >> I am this world's foremost expert at telling others
> >> to go **** themselves. After all, I know everything and they don't!
>
> >> You made a damn fool of yourself with Ed Gin on this newsgroup. The group
> >> was destroyed because of you two fools. He was a criminal vandal troll
> >> and
> >> you were a whining cry baby. If any