Valverde in yellow....end the race today!!!!

[kf3photo@gmail.com]

Let the semi-famous guy win the race today, avoid the complete
disgrace that is sure to follow
LeMond was right, he's been right about everything.

[zzfranklin@mac.com]

On Jul 5, 6:36 pm, kf3ph...@gmail.com wrote:
> Let the semi-famous guy win the race today, avoid the complete
> disgrace that is sure to follow
> LeMond was right, he's been right about everything.

You're an idiot.

[bjw@mambo.ucolick.org]

On Jul 5, 6:36 pm, kf3ph...@gmail.com wrote:
> Let the semi-famous guy win the race today, avoid the complete
> disgrace that is sure to follow
> LeMond was right, he's been right about everything.

How many 3-week stage races has Valverde won?
What's his highest placing in the Vuelta?
In the Tour?

LeMond is always right. I mean, he is right that
doping is rife in the peloton, but he's hardly the
only person to think that. The great thing about
being LeMond (or Lafferty) is that every time some
doper gets busted, it proves your point, but nothing
ever would provide evidence against your point.
When there is not a dope bust, it's proof of a
coverup or improvement in doping strategy. (That's
actually correct, but it's a lame argument.) So
of course, you're always right.

Ben

[Bob Schwartz]

kf3photo@gmail.com wrote:
> LeMond was right, he's been right about everything.

Lemond has his head so far up his ass on the 1985 Tour
that he can talk out of his neck.

Bob Schwartz

[snow4ever@gmail.com]

On Jul 5, 6:36*pm, kf3ph...@gmail.com wrote:
> Let the semi-famous guy win the race today, avoid the complete
> disgrace that is sure to follow
> LeMond was right, he's been right about everything.

See, I told ya!

[Kurgan Gringioni]

On Jul 5, 6:36*pm, kf3ph...@gmail.com wrote:
> Let the semi-famous guy win the race today, avoid the complete
> disgrace that is sure to follow
> LeMond was right, he's been right about everything.





Dumbass -


LemonD hasn't been right about this Tour. He pulled the Lafferty and
said it was clean.

From:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/sports/sportsspecial1/13lemond.html?_r=1&em&ex=1216180800&en=27df8d09b29df755&ei=5087%0A&oref=slogin

LeMond Returns to Tour, and Likes What He Sees

<snip>

“I’m the most optimistic about cycling probably since I turned pro,”
he said. “I believe there are ways that you can eliminate 98 percent
of the advantages of drugs, and I think the Tour de France realizes
it. I spent days talking to them, and I’m really optimistic about the
future of cycling and the Tour de France. Very optimistic.”

<snip><end>


In summary: dude, you're an idiot.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

[Fred Fredburger]

bjw@mambo.ucolick.org wrote:
> On Jul 5, 6:36 pm, kf3ph...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Let the semi-famous guy win the race today, avoid the complete
>> disgrace that is sure to follow
>> LeMond was right, he's been right about everything.
>
> How many 3-week stage races has Valverde won?
> What's his highest placing in the Vuelta?
> In the Tour?
>
> LeMond is always right. I mean, he is right that
> doping is rife in the peloton, but he's hardly the
> only person to think that. The great thing about
> being LeMond (or Lafferty) is that every time some
> doper gets busted, it proves your point, but nothing
> ever would provide evidence against your point.
> When there is not a dope bust, it's proof of a
> coverup or improvement in doping strategy. (That's
> actually correct, but it's a lame argument.) So
> of course, you're always right.

They're all going to die.

Remember, I pointed it out first!

[ST]

On 7/17/08 8:21 PM, in article
f4c0385e-8943-447a-8501-92fcb050d258@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com, "Kurgan
Gringioni" <kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 5, 6:36*pm, kf3ph...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Let the semi-famous guy win the race today, avoid the complete
>> disgrace that is sure to follow
>> LeMond was right, he's been right about everything.
>
>
>
>
>
> Dumbass -
>
>
> LemonD hasn't been right about this Tour. He pulled the Lafferty and
> said it was clean.
>
> From:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/sports/sportsspecial1/13lemond.html?_r=1&em&
> ex=1216180800&en=27df8d09b29df755&ei=5087%0A&oref=slogin
>
> LeMond Returns to Tour, and Likes What He Sees
>
> <snip>
>
> ³I¹m the most optimistic about cycling probably since I turned pro,²
> he said. ³I believe there are ways that you can eliminate 98 percent
> of the advantages of drugs, and I think the Tour de France realizes
> it. I spent days talking to them, and I¹m really optimistic about the
> future of cycling and the Tour de France. Very optimistic.²
>
> <snip><end>
>
>
> In summary: dude, you're an idiot.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> K. Gringioni.


Assbag -

You must have been corrected a lot when you were in charm school!
You obviously failed charm class and you are always correcting everyone
here..


You are the "Dear Crabby" column on the back page of the RBR Times!

[dave a]

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
> On Jul 5, 6:36 pm, kf3ph...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Let the semi-famous guy win the race today, avoid the complete
>> disgrace that is sure to follow
>> LeMond was right, he's been right about everything.
>
>
>
>
>
> Dumbass -
>
>
> LemonD hasn't been right about this Tour. He pulled the Lafferty and
> said it was clean.
>
> From:
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/sports/sportsspecial1/13lemond.html?_r=1&em&ex=1216180800&en=27df8d09b29df755&ei=5087%0A&oref=slogin
>
> LeMond Returns to Tour, and Likes What He Sees
>
> <snip>
>
> “I’m the most optimistic about cycling probably since I turned pro,”
> he said. “I believe there are ways that you can eliminate 98 percent
> of the advantages of drugs, and I think the Tour de France realizes
> it. I spent days talking to them, and I’m really optimistic about the
> future of cycling and the Tour de France. Very optimistic.”
>
> <snip><end>
>
>
> In summary: dude, you're an idiot.
>
>
> thanks,
>
> K. Gringioni.

Well, LemonD had one thing right, cycling doesn't need the UCI. He
obviously had some insider information when he declared that "cycling
doesn't need the UCI". Of course, he also mentioned that "cycling is
the Tour de France".

/dave a


http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2008/jul08/jul09news4