The Weirdness of JimmyMac

[Edward Dolan]

JimmyMac is not only weird, but bizarre. Note his concerns in the message
that follows.

>> Beating a dead horse is stating that Ed Gin the criminal vandal troll
killed ARBR. Now that is beating a dead horse and Dolan has done it
so frequently that even the dead horse has complained.

Ed Gin was the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR. He was aided and
abetted by JimmyMac who never had the brains to tell the troll to go ****
himself. Instead, he remonstrated with the troll because he was almost as
stupid as him. The two deserved one another in the final analysis.

> Won't your wife talk to you anymore? Why not cuddle your two
> poor old long suffering hound dogs if no one else will have you.

>> I've never understood this propensity of Dolan's. Can someone
enlighten me? Have you any insight into the reasons why Ed Dolan
delights in the incessant recitation of a litany of personal minutia
including....

>> - age
- ethnicity
- religious affiliation
- marital status
- educational background
- occupation
- place of residence
- type and number of pets
- etc.

I do it because I know it irritates you. You are such a jerk that there is
no other way of bringing it home to you but to get as personal as possible.
Just be thankful I do not go for your jugular. Stalkers deserve to have
their asses kicked and that is what I do best.

>> What's with this weirdness anyway? Ed should not feel the least bit
obligated to respond since I am ONLY interested in an objective
assessment of Dolan's irrational motivation rather than a
rationalization from the weirdo himself.

JimmyMac is only into one thing - stalking. That is all he is good for. What
a weird crazy freak he is!

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[JimmyMac]

On Jul 30, 8:21 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> JimmyMac is not only weird, but bizarre. Note his concerns in the message
> that follows.
>
> >> Beating a dead horse is stating that Ed Gin the criminal vandal troll
>
> killed ARBR. Now that is beating a dead horse and Dolan has done it
> so frequently that even the dead horse has complained.
>
> Ed Gin was the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR.

Ed Dolan's often repeated nonsense for which he has yet to offer
proof, and correct me if I'm wrong but having been able to make this
post, Dolan has contradicted himself by prmaturely announcing the
death of ARBR ... AGAIN! The conundrum continues.

> He was aided and
> abetted by JimmyMac who never had the brains to tell the troll to go ****
> himself. Instead, he remonstrated with the troll because he was almost as
> stupid as him. The two deserved one another in the final analysis.

Mere cut an paste regurgitated bolierplate that is nothing more than
fallacious opinion stated as fact. Pity the man as this i the best
that he can do.

> > Won't your wife talk to you anymore? Why not cuddle your two
> > poor old long suffering hound dogs if no one else will have you.
> >> I've never understood this propensity of Dolan's. Can someone
>
> enlighten me? Have you any insight into the reasons why Ed Dolan
> delights in the incessant recitation of a litany of personal minutia
> including....
>
> >> - age
>
> - ethnicity
> - religious affiliation
> - marital status
> - educational background
> - occupation
> - place of residence
> - type and number of pets
> - etc.
>
> I do it because I know it irritates you. You are such a jerk that there is
> no other way of bringing it home to you but to get as personal as possible.
> Just be thankful I do not go for your jugular.

Give me time to work up a tremble. Now I requested that Dolan not
respond with a rationalization for his weirdness. I am not tho only
person Dolan does this to and I could care less actually. I merely
think that is is very strange but after all I'm talking Dolan here.

Stalkers deserve to have
> their asses kicked and that is what I do best.

Not doing a very good job of it I guess. I rode 120 miles on an
upright in the past three day. Now how could I do that with a sore
ass.

> >> What's with this weirdness anyway? Ed should not feel the least bit
>
> obligated to respond since I am ONLY interested in an objective
> assessment of Dolan's irrational motivation rather than a
> rationalization from the weirdo himself.
>
> JimmyMac is only into one thing - stalking. That is all he is good for. What
> a weird crazy freak he is!

ED DOLAN IS HAVING ANOTHER ONE OF HIS CHARISMA MALFUNCTINOS!!!!! ...
Deliberately shouted to get through that thick head of his.

> ****ing Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[JimmyMac]

TOP POSTED ... In the thread you ported this from, you worte ... By
the way, this thread will no longer be responded to by me since it
died long ago.

BUT, BUT, BUT, you did respond just in a NEW thread breathing life
into the "dead thread". So how weird is that??? Never mind, The
question was rhetorical.

On Jul 30, 8:21*pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> JimmyMac is not only weird, but bizarre. Note his concerns in the message
> that follows.
>
> >> Beating a dead horse is stating that Ed Gin the criminal vandal troll
>
> killed ARBR. *Now that is beating a dead horse and Dolan has done it
> so frequently that even the dead horse has complained.
>
> Ed Gin was the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR. He was aided and
> abetted by JimmyMac who never had the brains to tell the troll to go ****
> himself. Instead, he remonstrated with the troll because he was almost as
> stupid as him. The two deserved one another in the final analysis.
>
> > Won't your wife talk to you anymore? Why not cuddle your two
> > poor old long suffering hound dogs if no one else will have you.
> >> I've never understood this propensity of Dolan's. *Can someone
>
> enlighten me? *Have you any insight into the reasons why Ed Dolan
> delights in the incessant recitation of a litany of personal minutia
> including....
>
> >> - age
>
> - ethnicity
> - religious affiliation
> - marital status
> - educational background
> - occupation
> - place of residence
> - type and number of pets
> - etc.
>
> I do it because I know it irritates you. You are such a jerk that there is
> no other way of bringing it home to you but to get as personal as possible.
> Just be thankful I do not go for your jugular. Stalkers deserve to have
> their asses kicked and that is what I do best.
>
> >> What's with this weirdness anyway? *Ed should not feel the least bit
>
> obligated to respond since I am ONLY interested in an objective
> assessment of Dolan's irrational motivation rather than a
> rationalization from the weirdo himself.
>
> JimmyMac is only into one thing - stalking. That is all he is good for. What
> a weird crazy freak he is!
>
> ****ing Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[Edward Dolan]

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a17e3d97-e1df-4d31-91c1-49b98bf82dec@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!

> TOP POSTED ... In the thread you ported this from, you worte ... By
the way, this thread will no longer be responded to by me since it
died long ago.

> BUT, BUT, BUT, you did respond just in a NEW thread breathing life
into the "dead thread". So how weird is that??? Never mind, The
question was rhetorical.

Once I have determined a thread is dead, I will start a new thread. I like
to stay near the top of my listing of threads in my newsreader.
[...]

****ing Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[JimmyMac]

On Jul 31, 10:21*pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a17e3d97-e1df-4d31-91c1-49b98bf82dec@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> > TOP POSTED ... In the thread you ported this from, you worte ... By
>
> the way, this thread will no longer be responded to by me since it
> died long ago.
>
> > BUT, BUT, BUT, you did respond just in a NEW thread breathing life
>
> into the "dead thread". *So how weird is that??? *Never mind, *The
> question was rhetorical.
>
> Once I have determined a thread is dead, I will start a new thread. *I like
> to stay near the top of my listing of threads in my newsreader.
> [...]

Once you have determined that a thread is dead, why bother to continue
the "dead thread" in a separate not so "new" thread ? Much of the
time you make no sense to anyone at all except your own twisted self
that is.

> ****ing Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[Edward Dolan]

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:83d46c76-378f-4c0b-8e0f-793f3399bc2c@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 31, 10:21 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a17e3d97-e1df-4d31-91c1-49b98bf82dec@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> > TOP POSTED ... In the thread you ported this from, you worte ... By
>
> the way, this thread will no longer be responded to by me since it
> died long ago.
>
> > BUT, BUT, BUT, you did respond just in a NEW thread breathing life
>
> into the "dead thread". So how weird is that??? Never mind, The
> question was rhetorical.
>
> Once I have determined a thread is dead, I will start a new thread. I like
> to stay near the top of my listing of threads in my newsreader.
> [...]

>>> Once you have determined that a thread is dead, why bother to continue
the "dead thread" in a separate not so "new" thread ? Much of the
time you make no sense to anyone at all except your own twisted self
that is.

You would recognize that I have changed the subject heading somewhat and the
message somewhat if you weren't so dense. I will continue to do this every
week or so. A dead thread that is overly long does not interest me.

> ****ing Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[JimmyMac]

On Aug 2, 12:41*am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:83d46c76-378f-4c0b-8e0f-793f3399bc2c@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 31, 10:21 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:a17e3d97-e1df-4d31-91c1-49b98bf82dec@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com....
>
> > ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> > > TOP POSTED ... In the thread you ported this from, you worte ... By
>
> > the way, this thread will no longer be responded to by me since it
> > died long ago.
>
> > > BUT, BUT, BUT, you did respond just in a NEW thread breathing life
>
> > into the "dead thread". So how weird is that??? Never mind, The
> > question was rhetorical.
>
> > Once I have determined a thread is dead, I will start a new thread. I like
> > to stay near the top of my listing of threads in my newsreader.
> > [...]
> >>> Once you have determined that a thread is dead, why bother to continue
>
> the "dead thread" in a separate not so "new" thread? *Much of the
> time you make no sense to anyone at all except your own twisted self
> that is.
>
> You would recognize that I have changed the subject heading somewhat and the
> message somewhat if you weren't so dense. I will continue to do this every
> week or so. A dead thread that is overly long does not interest me.
>
> > ****ing Regards,
>
> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[JimmyMac]

On Aug 2, 12:41*am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:83d46c76-378f-4c0b-8e0f-793f3399bc2c@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 31, 10:21 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:a17e3d97-e1df-4d31-91c1-49b98bf82dec@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com....
>
> > ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS!
>
> > > TOP POSTED ... In the thread you ported this from, you worte ... By
>
> > the way, this thread will no longer be responded to by me since it
> > died long ago.
>
> > > BUT, BUT, BUT, you did respond just in a NEW thread breathing life
>
> > into the "dead thread". So how weird is that??? Never mind, The
> > question was rhetorical.
>
> > Once I have determined a thread is dead, I will start a new thread. I like
> > to stay near the top of my listing of threads in my newsreader.
> > [...]
> >>> Once you have determined that a thread is dead, why bother to continue
>
> the "dead thread" in a separate not so "new" thread ? *Much of the
> time you make no sense to anyone at all except your own twisted self
> that is.
>
> You would recognize that I have changed the subject heading somewhat and the
> message somewhat if you weren't so dense. I will continue to do this every
> week or so. A dead thread that is overly long does not interest me.

Yes I recognize that you changed the subject heading somewhat and the
message somewhat, but ... SO WHAT? Why do you not recognize that this
does not substantially change what anything regarding you have labeled
a "dead thread", not even SOMEHAT, so who is really the DENSE one
here? I mean hust how dumb can he get? Dolan must get a perverse
sense of pleasure from beating dead horses.

> > ****ing Regards,

Regards ****ing ... tis a pity that you never had the experience.

> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[Edward Dolan]

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9f0d878e-1e01-444f-8a76-730347c729c9@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 2, 12:41 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
[...]
> You would recognize that I have changed the subject heading somewhat and
> the
> message somewhat if you weren't so dense. I will continue to do this every
> week or so. A dead thread that is overly long does not interest me.

>>> Yes I recognize that you changed the subject heading somewhat and the
message somewhat, but ... SO WHAT? Why do you not recognize that this
does not substantially change what anything regarding you have labeled
a "dead thread", not even SOMEHAT, so who is really the DENSE one
here? I mean hust how dumb can he get? Dolan must get a perverse
sense of pleasure from beating dead horses.

A new thread with a new subject heading gives you an opportunity to start
fresh and not be such a jerk all the time.

> > ****ing Regards,

>>> Regards ****ing ... tis a pity that you never had the experience.

Too much ****ing and you will go blind and/or turn into a ****head. Give
your poor longsuffering wife a rest since you are no longer into
procreation.

> > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > aka
> > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[Jym Dyer]

Ed Dolan writes:

> [Deletia. Does anyone really care, really?]

=x= Shut the **** up, you tiresome loser. Get a life.
<_Jym_>

[JimmyMac]

On Aug 2, 8:06*pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9f0d878e-1e01-444f-8a76-730347c729c9@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 2, 12:41 am, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> [...]
>
> > You would recognize that I have changed the subject heading somewhat and
> > the
> > message somewhat if you weren't so dense. I will continue to do this every
> > week or so. A dead thread that is overly long does not interest me.
> >>> Yes I recognize that you changed the subject heading somewhat and the
>
> message somewhat, but ... SO WHAT? *Why do you not recognize that this
> does not substantially change what anything regarding you have labeled
> a "dead thread", not even SOMEHAT, so who is really the DENSE one
> here? *I mean just how dumb can he get? *Dolan must get a perverse
> sense of pleasure from beating dead horses.
>
> A new thread with a new subject heading gives you an opportunity to start
> fresh and not be such a jerk all the time.

A new thread with a new subject heading but the same old content is
merely a re-branded old thread. Even a moron would recognize that.
Try to get up to speed. By the way, it is impossible for you not to
be a jerk all the time. It runs contrary to your grain.

> > > ****ing Regards,
> >>> Regards ****ing ... tis a pity that you never had the experience.
>
> Too much ****ing and you will go blind and/or turn into a ****head. Give
> your poor longsuffering wife a rest since you are no longer into
> procreation.

Once again, Dolan flaunts his ignorance. He knows nothing of my wife,
or the nature of our relationship.

> > > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > > aka
> > > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[Tom Sherman]

Jym Dyer wrote:
> Ed Dolan writes:
>
>> [Deletia. Does anyone really care, really?]
>
> =x= Shut the **** up, you tiresome loser. Get a life.
> <_Jym_>

Thread title says it all.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
“Mary had a little lamb / And when she saw it sicken /
She shipped it off to Packingtown / And now it’s labeled chicken.”

[Edward Dolan]

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6330e4ea-79d0-47bf-a6e3-82b8e9b8879e@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 2, 8:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
[...]
> >>> Regards ****ing ... tis a pity that you never had the experience.
>
> Too much ****ing and you will go blind and/or turn into a ****head. Give
> your poor longsuffering wife a rest since you are no longer into
> procreation.

>> Once again, Dolan flaunts his ignorance. He knows nothing of my wife,
or the nature of our relationship.

Every time you bring up sexual innuendo I will be bring up your wife. I
don't think she will like what I have to say about the two of you. And she
will find out some day. Women are nosy.

> > > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > > aka
> > > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[JimmyMac]

On Aug 3, 7:05*pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6330e4ea-79d0-47bf-a6e3-82b8e9b8879e@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 2, 8:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>
> > "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> [...]
> > >>> Regards ****ing ... tis a pity that you never had the experience.
>
> > Too much ****ing and you will go blind and/or turn into a ****head. Give
> > your poor longsuffering wife a rest since you are no longer into
> > procreation.
> >> Once again, Dolan flaunts his ignorance. *He knows nothing of my wife,
>
> or the nature of our relationship.
>
> Every time you bring up sexual innuendo I will be bring up your wife. I
> don't think she will like what I have to say about the two of you. And she
> will find out some day. Women are nosy.

You protest too much. Now why would that be?

Do you really think anyone cares? What you say of us (read offensive,
unsavory fiction) in no way defines who and what we are, but what you
say of us defines who and what you are and will forever be your
archived legacy. It has become increasingly apparent that you still
suffer from delusions of credibility.

> > > > Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> > > > aka
> > > > Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[Edward Dolan]

"JimmyMac" <jimmymac_4@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d152bedc-5b1c-4223-965b-904e09e8e385@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 3, 7:05 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6330e4ea-79d0-47bf-a6e3-82b8e9b8879e@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 2, 8:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>
> > "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> [...]
> > >>> Regards ****ing ... tis a pity that you never had the experience.
>
> > Too much ****ing and you will go blind and/or turn into a ****head. Give
> > your poor longsuffering wife a rest since you are no longer into
> > procreation.
> >> Once again, Dolan flaunts his ignorance. He knows nothing of my wife,
>
> or the nature of our relationship.
>
> Every time you bring up sexual innuendo I will bring up your wife. I
> don't think she will like what I have to say about the two of you. And she
> will find out some day. Women are nosy.

>> You protest too much. Now why would that be?

It is because I am a Great Saint known far and wide as Saint Edward the
Great. And you are pond scum!

>> Do you really think anyone cares?

No one cares except you. I sure as hell don't!

>> What you say of us (read offensive,
unsavory fiction) in no way defines who and what we are, but what you
say of us defines who and what you are and will forever be your
archived legacy. It has become increasingly apparent that you still
suffer from delusions of credibility.

Google will eliminate all this Usenet crap one day sooner than you think.
Your archived legacy will go the way of all ****.

Regards,

Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota

[JimmyMac]

On Aug 3, 11:29*pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
> "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d152bedc-5b1c-4223-965b-904e09e8e385@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 3, 7:05 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:6330e4ea-79d0-47bf-a6e3-82b8e9b8879e@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> > On Aug 2, 8:06 pm, "Edward Dolan" <edo...@iw.net> wrote:
>
> > > "JimmyMac" <jimmyma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > [...]
> > > >>> Regards ****ing ... tis a pity that you never had the experience.
>
> > > Too much ****ing and you will go blind and/or turn into a ****head. Give
> > > your poor longsuffering wife a rest since you are no longer into
> > > procreation.
> > >> Once again, Dolan flaunts his ignorance. He knows nothing of my wife,
>
> > or the nature of our relationship.
>
> > Every time you bring up sexual innuendo I will bring up your wife. I
> > don't think she will like what I have to say about the two of you. And she
> > will find out some day. Women are nosy.
> >> You protest too much. *Now why would that be?
>
> It is because I am a Great Saint known far and wide as Saint Edward the
> Great. And you are pond scum!
>
> >> Do you really think anyone cares?
>
> No one cares except you. I sure as hell don't!
>
> >> What you say of us (read offensive,
>
> unsavory fiction) in no way defines who and what we are, but what you
> say of us defines who and what you are and will forever be your
> archived legacy. *It has become increasingly apparent that you still
> suffer from delusions of credibility.
>
> Google will eliminate all this Usenet crap one day sooner than you think.
> Your archived legacy will go the way of all ****.

And if and when that day comes to pass, it will be too much for you to
bear. Suicide may be in your future.

> Regards,
>
> Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
> aka
> Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota