Your wife, girlfriend, daughter or sister gets raped.

[Anton Berlin]

Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
term.

And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc=2008campaign&position=9

But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
sentence.

[zzfranklin@mac.com]

On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> term.
>
> And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc....
>
> But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> sentence.

Dumbass,

She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.

[ilanpsi@gmail.com]

On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> term.
>
> And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc....
>
> But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> sentence.

Thanks for the tip, I'm going out to buy me some condoms.

-ilan

[Tom Kunich]

"Anton Berlin" <truth_88888@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d5d04cec-4827-47ef-a62b-420b6d5f733c@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> term.
>
> And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.

Exactly what sort of animal is willing to lie about anything at all?

[MagillaGorilla]

Anton Berlin wrote:
> Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> term.
>
> And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc=2008campaign&position=9
>
> But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> sentence.
>


Wrong. Dumbass.

Under Sarah Palin, assuming she gets a say in appointing a Supreme, if
the court were to overturn Roe v. Wade, all it means is states would get
to decide whether or not abortion is legal or not. The federal
government or Supreme Cout cannot ban abortion unless Congress passes a
new federal law.

So if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, unless that state
government also banned abortion, then your little worst case scenario
wouldn't apply.

Thanks,

Magilla

[Kurgan Gringioni]

On Sep 15, 11:35*pm, zzfrank...@mac.com wrote:
> On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > term.
>
> > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> >http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc....
>
> > But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> > to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> > sentence.
>
> Dumbass,
>
> She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
> Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.




Dumbass -


Unless 72 year old McCain (who has had cancer) kicks the bucket.

Then she'll be in charge of foreign policy. That's the big problem.
She can't do that much to **** up domestic policy because Congress has
such a large say over legislation. Foreign policy is another matter.
Can you imagine her negotiating with Vladimir Putin? The Saudis? etc?


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

[John Forrest Tomlinson]

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:35:58 -0700 (PDT), zzfranklin@mac.com wrote:

>On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
>> term.
>>
>> And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>>
>> http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc...
>>
>> But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
>> to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
>> sentence.
>
>Dumbass,
>
>She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
>Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.

Dumbass. On reproductive rights and rights to abortion, the
batteground is supreme court nominations.

[P.Chisholm]

On Sep 16, 12:35*am, zzfrank...@mac.com wrote:
> On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > term.
>
> > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> >http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc....
>
> > But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> > to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> > sentence.
>
> Dumbass,
>
> She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
> Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.

The Senate will be in the 55/44/Leiberman range after the election,
she'll never do anything but hit her gavel once in a while..IF she is
elected, which is not gonna happen.

[fred.garvin@yahoo.com]

On Sep 16, 1:43*am, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 11:35*pm, zzfrank...@mac.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > > term.
>
> > > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> > >http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc...
>
> > > But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> > > to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> > > sentence.
>
> > Dumbass,
>
> > She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
> > Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.
>
> Dumbass -
>
> Unless 72 year old McCain (who has had cancer) kicks the bucket.
>
> Then she'll be in charge of foreign policy. That's the big problem.
> She can't do that much to **** up domestic policy because Congress has
> such a large say over legislation. Foreign policy is another matter.
> Can you imagine her negotiating with Vladimir Putin? The Saudis? etc?
>
> thanks,
>
> K. Gringioni.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I'd rather have Palin dealing with the Russians than Obama.

[Anton Berlin]

On Sep 16, 2:43*am, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 11:35*pm, zzfrank...@mac.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > > term.
>
> > > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> > >http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc...
>
> > > But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> > > to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> > > sentence.
>
> > Dumbass,
>
> > She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
> > Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.
>
> Dumbass -
>
> Unless 72 year old McCain (who has had cancer) kicks the bucket.
>
> Then she'll be in charge of foreign policy. That's the big problem.
> She can't do that much to **** up domestic policy because Congress has
> such a large say over legislation. Foreign policy is another matter.
> Can you imagine her negotiating with Vladimir Putin? The Saudis? etc?
>
> thanks,
>
> K. Gringioni.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

A McCain is already half dead. The TV does a hugely bad job at
portraying how fragile small and sickly he is.

We know that as she leads us into WWIII she'll be certain to say their
first names over and over

The next admin will change the balance in the supreme court you
supreme moron. Just having her in the kitchen will affect the way the
soup comes out.

[P.Chisholm]

On Sep 16, 3:05*am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:35:58 -0700 (PDT), zzfrank...@mac.com wrote:
> >On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> >> term.
>
> >> And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> >>http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc....
>
> >> But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> >> to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> >> sentence.
>
> >Dumbass,
>
> >She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
> >Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.
>
> Dumbass. *On reproductive rights and rights to abortion, the
> batteground is supreme court nominations.

hmmm..6 outta 9 have been put there by Republican presidents and it
hasn't come up..

[SLAVE of THE STATE]

On Sep 16, 2:05*am, John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetrem...@jt10000.com>
wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:35:58 -0700 (PDT), zzfrank...@mac.com wrote:
> >On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> >> term.
>
> >> And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> >>http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc....
>
> >> But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> >> to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> >> sentence.
>
> >Dumbass,
>
> >She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
> >Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.
>
> Dumbass. *On reproductive rights and rights to abortion, the
> batteground is supreme court nominations.

Exactly.

We *know* Obama will appoint anti-constitutional judges. With McCain,
we don't know how it will go.

It is one of the few areas where the election is important, as the two
candidates are generally very poor choices.

McCain seems to be more aware (read _honest_) regarding the structure
of governance in the US (federalism). I say this with respect to his
comments regarding a possible marriage amendment, if the federal
judges overreach.

Since Obama hates federalism, he hates america, since that is a
defining characteristic of america. We know what he will do. He
promised change. I believe him.

Scary stuff.

Poor choices, but one candidate seems to have the edge in "least bad."

Regardless of one's views on abortion, and what state law ought to be,
Roe v Wade was an anti-constitutional ruling. Obama will attempt to
destroy whatever might be left of the constitution. Know it.
Democrats are a bunch of nationalistic chest pounders who hate
america. I used to be one. I know.

[Barry Harmon]

John Forrest Tomlinson <usenetremove@jt10000.com> wrote in
news:cmtuc4ti5t5a6199kceu91dfbds83bqsci@4ax.com:

> On Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:35:58 -0700 (PDT), zzfranklin@mac.com wrote:
>
>>On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
>>> term.
>>>
>>> And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>>>
>>> http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416
&srvc
>>> ...
>>>
>>> But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
>>> to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the
>>> prison sentence.
>>
>>Dumbass,
>>
>>She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
>>Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.
>
> Dumbass. On reproductive rights and rights to abortion, the
> batteground is supreme court nominations.
>

The strange thing about abortion is that there is no national law
regarding it. There is a Supreme Court decision, but no Congressional
Law. As iot stands now, a woman's "right" to abortion stems from a
Supreme Court decision unsupported by law.

The proper place for abortion law is at the state level, but things are
so confused and acrimonious that we may never get this solved. There
are too many single-issue people on both sides of the issue.

Barry Harmon

[Tom Kunich]

"P.Chisholm" <peter@vecchios.com> wrote in message
news:f05a860e-50d3-4a56-8622-0867e59663e2@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>
> hmmm..6 outta 9 have been put there by Republican presidents and it
> hasn't come up..

But you have to admit that every time the Dems open their mouths they're
screaming about the dangers of not allowing women to murder babies.
Murdering babies is the most important right possible to a lefty.

[Tom Kunich]

<fred.garvin@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c0a8065e-21c3-402a-b23b-ceb0eb1d18cc@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
>
> I'd rather have Palin dealing with the Russians than Obama.

The lefties here want a Stalinesque US more than anything in the world.

[Anton Berlin]

On Sep 16, 8:47*am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "Anton Berlin" <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d5d04cec-4827-47ef-a62b-420b6d5f733c@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > term.
>
> > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> Exactly what sort of animal is willing to lie about anything at all?

Can't you even read Kunt itch ? Is every republican a coward and just
sticks their head in the sand when confronted with facts they don't
like.

McCain and Palin are the worst kind of liars and so called moralists
because they think they are somehow right and some how jsutified for
everything they do or will do.

It's the new Cheney and anyone with a conscience should be appalled
and have nothing but contempt for these people.

[Howard Kveck]

In article <QdudnRzabJF5JVLVnZ2dnUVZ_oTinZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:

> "Anton Berlin" <truth_88888@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:d5d04cec-4827-47ef-a62b-420b6d5f733c@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
> > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > term.
> >
> > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> Exactly what sort of animal is willing to lie about anything at all?

You? Is "you" the right answer?

--
tanx,
Howard

I'll take the case!

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

[Anton Berlin]

On Sep 16, 8:50*am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> "P.Chisholm" <pe...@vecchios.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f05a860e-50d3-4a56-8622-0867e59663e2@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > hmmm..6 outta 9 have been put there by Republican presidents and it
> > hasn't come up..
>
> But you have to admit that every time the Dems open their mouths they're
> screaming about the dangers of not allowing women to murder babies.
> Murdering babies is the most important right possible to a lefty.

And keeping rapists, their victims and the gentetically predisposed
criminal rapist offspring together is the wet dream of every small
dicked Republican.

[Kurgan Gringioni]

On Sep 16, 9:17*am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2:43*am, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 15, 11:35*pm, zzfrank...@mac.com wrote:
>
> > > On Sep 15, 9:27*pm, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > > > term.
>
> > > > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> > > >http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/view.bg?articleid=1118416&srvc...
>
> > > > But Dobson and Focus on the Family would provide low cost counseling
> > > > to keep the new family together while the rapist serves out the prison
> > > > sentence.
>
> > > Dumbass,
>
> > > She'll have the tie breaking vote in the Senate once she's elected.
> > > Abortion will never come up in said circumstances.
>
> > Dumbass -
>
> > Unless 72 year old McCain (who has had cancer) kicks the bucket.
>
> > Then she'll be in charge of foreign policy. That's the big problem.
> > She can't do that much to **** up domestic policy because Congress has
> > such a large say over legislation. Foreign policy is another matter.
> > Can you imagine her negotiating with Vladimir Putin? The Saudis? etc?
>
> > thanks,
>
> > K. Gringioni.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> A McCain is already half dead. *The TV does a hugely bad job at
> portraying how fragile small and sickly he is.
>
> We know that as she leads us into WWIII she'll be certain to say their
> first names over and over
>
> The next admin will change the balance in the supreme court you
> supreme moron. *Just having her in the kitchen will affect the way the
> soup comes out.



Dumbass -


Ya, but even Supreme Court nominees have to go through the Senate.

Foreign policy does not. Hence Bush/Cheney's remarkable job at ****ing
up things overseas. You moron.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

[SLAVE of THE STATE]

On Sep 16, 9:21*am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 8:47*am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
> > "Anton Berlin" <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:d5d04cec-4827-47ef-a62b-420b6d5f733c@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com....
>
> > > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > > term.
>
> > > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> > Exactly what sort of animal is willing to lie about anything at all?
>
> Can't you even read Kunt itch ? *Is every republican a coward and just
> sticks their head in the sand when confronted with facts they don't
> like.
>
> McCain and Palin are the worst kind of liars and so called moralists
> because they think they are somehow right and some how jsutified for
> everything they do or will do.
>
> It's the new Cheney and anyone with a conscience should be appalled
> and have nothing but contempt for these people.

[Kurgan Gringioni]

On Sep 16, 9:21*am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 8:47*am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
> > "Anton Berlin" <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:d5d04cec-4827-47ef-a62b-420b6d5f733c@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com....
>
> > > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > > term.
>
> > > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> > Exactly what sort of animal is willing to lie about anything at all?
>
> Can't you even read Kunt itch ? *Is every republican a coward and just
> sticks their head in the sand when confronted with facts they don't
> like.
>
> McCain and Palin are the worst kind of liars and so called moralists
> because they think they are somehow right and some how jsutified for
> everything they do or will do.




Dumbass -


Your characterization of Palin is correct.

McCain - no.

The religious conservatives don't like him because, other than the
issue of abortion, he isn't with their agenda. In the past he's shown
open disdain for the social conservatives. It's something he isn't
doing now because he wants to be president. He "tapped" someone like
Palin for VP in an attempt to win them over.

I'll guess that if McCain gets elected, Palin will be totally
marginalized like most (not all) vice presidents. The problem is what
happens if McCain kicks the bucket.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

[SLAVE of THE STATE]

On Sep 16, 9:21 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Is every republican a coward and just
> sticks their head in the sand when confronted with facts they don't
> like.

Roe v Wade was anti-constitutional. There is a fact for you.

The states can make sure abortion is allowed, or not allowed, and the
feds can't say jack **** about it. That is the rule-of-law. I get
the feeling you don't like the rule-of-law. I get the feeling that is
a fact, but I can't head my head into it. I guess all this makes you
a republican, by your definition.

[Tom Kunich]

"Anton Berlin" <truth_88888@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2d64e894-556b-4d82-8c41-ac983f54258e@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 16, 8:50 am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
> >
> > But you have to admit that every time the Dems open their mouths they're
> > screaming about the dangers of not allowing women to murder babies.
> > Murdering babies is the most important right possible to a lefty.
>
> And keeping rapists, their victims and the gentetically predisposed
> criminal rapist offspring together is the wet dream of every small
> dicked Republican.

Thanks for posting that. It means I don't have to explain to anyone exactly
what you are. So what's a "gentetically predisposed criminal rapist
offspring"?

[Bill C]

On Sep 16, 1:28*pm, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 9:21*am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 16, 8:47*am, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
> > > "Anton Berlin" <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:d5d04cec-4827-47ef-a62b-420b6d5f733c@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com....
>
> > > > Under Sarah Palin, they would be required to carry the baby to full
> > > > term.
>
> > > > And have to pay for the 'rape kit'.
>
> > > Exactly what sort of animal is willing to lie about anything at all?
>
> > Can't you even read Kunt itch ? *Is every republican a coward and just
> > sticks their head in the sand when confronted with facts they don't
> > like.
>
> > McCain and Palin are the worst kind of liars and so called moralists
> > because they think they are somehow right and some how jsutified for
> > everything they do or will do.
>
> Dumbass -
>
> Your characterization of Palin is correct.
>
> McCain - no.
>
> The religious conservatives don't like him because, other than the
> issue of abortion, he isn't with their agenda. In the past he's shown
> open disdain for the social conservatives. It's something he isn't
> doing now because he wants to be president. He "tapped" someone like
> Palin for VP in an attempt to win them over.
>
> I'll guess that if McCain gets elected, Palin will be totally
> marginalized like most (not all) vice presidents. The problem is what
> happens if McCain kicks the bucket.
>
> thanks,
>
> K. Gringioni.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

You know you are a real ****up around here. You post some of the most
rational reasoned insightful **** getting posted around here. You're
really gonna fubar your rbr cred.
Bill C

[Fred Fredburger]

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:

> Roe v Wade was anti-constitutional. There is a fact for you.
>

You should probably call the Supreme Court and tell them about that.

[Kurgan Gringioni]

On Sep 16, 8:08*pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 9:21 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Is every republican a coward and just
> > sticks their head in the sand when confronted with facts they don't
> > like.
>
> Roe v Wade was anti-constitutional. *There is a fact for you.




Dumbass -


That is not correct.

The Constitution does not address the issue of abortion in any way
whatsoever. How can something be unconstitutional if the Constitution
doesn't address it?


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

[Jack Hollis]

On 17 Sep 2008 03:51:47 GMT, Barry Harmon <johnfrum@optonline.net>
wrote:

>The strange thing about abortion is that there is no national law
>regarding it. There is a Supreme Court decision, but no Congressional
>Law. As iot stands now, a woman's "right" to abortion stems from a
>Supreme Court decision unsupported by law.

RvW states that a woman has the constitutional right to an abortion
under the right to privacy provision in the Constitution. As such, it
is a national law. No state or municipal law can ban abortion
because it would violate RvW. The Congress is also powerless to make
abortion illegal for the same reason. Congress could. however,
propose a constitutional ammendment making abortion illegal. If such
an amendemnt was ratified, it would void RvW. Finally, the SCOTUS
could itself overturn RvW.

[SLAVE of THE STATE]

On Sep 16, 11:13*pm, Fred Fredburger
<Fred.Fredbur...@Where.Are.The.Nachos.Huh> wrote:
> SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
>
> > Roe v Wade was anti-constitutional. *There is a fact for you.
>
> You should probably call the Supreme Court and tell them about that.

I'm pretty sure they know.

[Donald Munro]

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
>> Roe v Wade was anti-constitutional. There is a fact for you.
>>
Fred Fredburger wrote:
> You should probably call the Supreme Court and tell them about that.

Better still moonlight as a judge. That way he might make enough to
supply all his pets with PMs. And I'm sure Chung is itching to get
his hands on one the recently released Quarqs.

[Jack Hollis]

On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:13:13 -0700, Fred Fredburger
<Fred.Fredburger@Where.Are.The.Nachos.Huh> wrote:

>> Roe v Wade was anti-constitutional. There is a fact for you.
>>
>
>You should probably call the Supreme Court and tell them about that.

From my understanding, there are presently four justices who feel that
way too.

[SLAVE of THE STATE]

On Sep 17, 6:45*am, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 11:13*pm, Fred Fredburger
>
> <Fred.Fredbur...@Where.Are.The.Nachos.Huh> wrote:
> > SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:
>
> > > Roe v Wade was anti-constitutional. *There is a fact for you.
>
> > You should probably call the Supreme Court and tell them about that.
>
> I'm pretty sure they know.

By the way Mr. Smartypants, Scalia announced on national TeeVee that
the Constitution is dead. Don't waste your time with me; Ponder why
he said that.

Random notes:
- I did not find M. K. Curtis persuasive on the 14th (v Berger).
- McCain-Feingold is unconstitutional.

"Take nobody’s word for it; see for yourself."-—Motto of the Royal
Society, London

That's right, you shouldn't believe usenet posts.

[Fred Fredburger]

SLAVE of THE STATE wrote:

> By the way Mr. Smartypants, Scalia announced on national TeeVee that
> the Constitution is dead. Don't waste your time with me; Ponder why
> he said that.

Seriously, we need a revolution. If I didn't have to get up out of my
nice comfy chair, I'd think about joining. Maybe after Wall Street
collapses and I can't afford my "comfy chair" bill.

[SLAVE of THE STATE]

On Sep 17, 11:10*am, Kurgan Gringioni <kgringi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 8:08*pm, SLAVE of THE STATE <gwh...@ti.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 16, 9:21 am, Anton Berlin <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Is every republican a coward and just
> > > sticks their head in the sand when confronted with facts they don't
> > > like.
>
> > Roe v Wade was anti-constitutional. *There is a fact for you.
>
> Dumbass -
>
> That is not correct.
>
> The Constitution does not address the issue of abortion in any way
> whatsoever. How can something be unconstitutional if the Constitution
> doesn't address it?
>
> thanks,
>
> K. Gringioni.



I didn't know plenary powers were granted.

[Jack Hollis]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:10:59 -0700 (PDT), Kurgan Gringioni
<kgringioni@hotmail.com> wrote:

>That is not correct.
>
>The Constitution does not address the issue of abortion in any way
>whatsoever. How can something be unconstitutional if the Constitution
>doesn't address it?
>
>
>thanks,
>
>K. Gringioni.


The decision is based on the constitutional right to privacy.

There are many constitutional rights that are not mentioned in the
Constitution. One of our most precious rights is habeas corpus, but
it is also not mentioned in the Constitution. The right to habeas
corpus is based on the right of due process.

There is a huge body of case law that goes along with the
Constitution. Most of this case law comes from the SCOTUS in its role
of interpreting the Constitution.

RvW is the law unless it is either overturned by the SCOTUS, or a
constitutional amendment is passed banning abortion. In reality, the
chance of a constitutional amendment is remote. So it's up to the SC.

[SLAVE of THE STATE]

On Sep 17, 5:26*pm, Jack Hollis <xslee...@aol.com> wrote:

> There are many constitutional rights that are not mentioned in the
> Constitution. *One of our most precious rights is habeas corpus, but
> it is also not mentioned in the Constitution. *The right to habeas
> corpus is based on the right of due process.

-----------------
Excerpt
Article 1, §9
The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended,
unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may
require it.

-----------------

The presence of this clause in the constitution was one of the clubs
the Anti-Federalists used to bludgeon the Federalists with in the Anti-
Federalist's demand for a Bill of Rights.

Ironically, the weapon was ultimately turned back onto the Anti-
Federalists.